[Pompom29]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

There should be no discussion! The facts are written in the Bible!

[marcvs]

what is the truth of the universe...?

If you actually were prof. Dawkins' son, I'm sure daddy would have warned you not to post here. But you did, and now you deserve the title you have been baptised with here I know it's hard to resist, but you know this is going nowhere - the replies you will get will be a mix of insults, bible quotes, trivial grammar corrections and possibly "read the rules, idiot" (if you didn't fill a profile to introduce yourself).

Ahh, kids... will they ever learn. This is what happens when you don't beat your son hard enough.








P.S.

Dawkins Jr., you should be here to learn about Baptists and not be a science evangelist.

For example, do Baptists consider creation literally to have taken 6 earth days? I'm asking this because I know some other christian groups feel this is unclear, or possibly should not be taken literally. If I were christian I would feel it has little to do with my faith - 7 days, 7,000 years, who cares? that's not the Bible's message.

cheers

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

For example, do Baptists consider creation literally to have taken 6 earth days? I'm asking this because I know some other christian groups feel this is unclear, or possibly should not be taken literally

The Bible is the inerrant Word of God, a 100% accurate account of the history of the world. If God said He created everything in six days, then it took six days! False "Christians" who doubt this are agents of Satan who are trying to paint God as a liar!

[Shaunii]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

The evidence that the "Big Bang" truly created this wonderful world is slight and slim, no more than tainted words of men who are too arrogant to consider that there is a force out there that has indeed created a world for us to exist in. The word in the lords book is that of the truth and nothing can prove it wrond except the insolence of those modern men. But perhaps the Big Bang did create the world, surely that did not happen by chance, perhaps that the Lord our god was behind that aswell for we do not know how long the lord had existed before creating the marvels of today.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

The evidence that the "Big Bang" truly created this wonderful world is slight and slim, no more than tainted words of men who are too arrogant to consider that there is a force out there that has indeed created a world for us to exist in. The word in the lords book is that of the truth and nothing can prove it wrond except the insolence of those modern men. But perhaps the Big Bang did create the world, surely that did not happen by chance, perhaps that the Lord our god was behind that aswell for we do not know how long the lord had existed before creating the marvels of today.

Lady, show us where your "big bang" in mentioned anywhere in the Bible.

Do you even understand what that "big bang" theory is about? They claim that the universe just suddenly appeared like a magic trick with a loud pop! Why I've never heard anything more ridiculous in my life! Everyone knows that you can't make something out of nothing.

[Jenni111]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

Everyone knows that you can't make something out of nothing.

That's true. It's even in the "Law of Conservation Of Energy" that they use

[NonSense Crusade]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

After the Big Bang, the Universe was an incredibly hot fireball, expanding to create the Universe we see around us today. In the beginning though, space was jam-packed full of tiny particles. Light couldn't travel anywhere: it was immediately halted by all the particles that were flying around. So space was completely opaque, a concept which is very hard for us to imagine, as we are used to being able to see everything around us.
But after 300,000 years, the Universe had cooled to about the same temperature as the surface of the Sun. This was when particles began to join to form atoms. Atoms don't interfere with light, letting it travel by unimpeded. So gradually light began to pour through the Universe.
The afterglow from this momentous event formed a bright halo, whose light then began gradually to filter down through space and time. As we look out into space we also look back into time. If it were possible to see out this far, this cosmic halo would form the furthest visible point in the Universe. Everything beyond this, from the birth of the Universe until this epoch of 'first light' will be invisible to us forever

But if we can't see it then how do we know that it's there? In 1963, two astronomers, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, chanced across a mysterious signal, later called 'the cosmic microwave background', or CMB for short. This signal is the leftover energy from this historic cosmic event. An event so powerful that its effects filtered all the way through space and time and can still be detected today. You can even see it for yourself - the fuzzy interference that appears on your untuned TV set is the signature from the early Universe.
When astronomers measured this signal in different directions, they saw that it was stronger in some areas than others. This is due to the fact that in the early Universe atoms weren't spread out evenly, so light flooded across the Universe in uneven ripples. There have been many recent projects, such as BOOMERanG and MAXIMA, which involved sending balloons above the Earth's atmosphere to measure these ripples in the CMB. Astronomers can then create a map of the early Universe and see how matter evolved into galaxies. Not only that, but by measuring this pattern across all of the sky, astronomers can calculate the shape and size of the whole Universe. Doing this will help to crack one of the greatest mysteries of all time - the fate of the Universe

Actually, the big bang theory says the universe was not made from those particles of heluim and hydrogen, but energy that condensed into matter.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Creationism VS Science... ... ... A discussion

Actually, the big bang theory says the universe was not made from those particles of heluim and hydrogen, but energy that condensed into matter.

Great. Now the Darwinist monkey worshipers are arguing with each other. This should be good.