Originally posted by Goldenshark
View Post
X
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
I can answer them all, if you wish I can do
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Oh, that's what the poster said?Originally posted by Brother Gonzalez View PostI will try:
"I'm making a lame attempt to agree with this post, arguing that women are weaker and they are still around. So that disproves the evolution theory and the survival of the strongest.
Therefore, the Bible is right."
Do you think my translation is ok? I'm learning American, so this is good exercise!
I was thinking more in lines of Didymus' translation, that he was asking why women had round body parts (I assumed he meant breasts and hips which tend to be more round in women than in men).
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
I will try:Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
Can someone please translate this to English? Ebonics is not on the list of languages I speak.
"I'm making a lame attempt to agree with this post, arguing that women are weaker and they are still around. So that disproves the evolution theory and the survival of the strongest.
Therefore, the Bible is right."
Do you think my translation is ok? I'm learning American, so this is good exercise!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Poor diet and lack of exercise are the usual causes of obesity.Originally posted by genos.occide View Post...so whyre they still round...
But what does this have to do with the Bible?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Originally posted by genos.occide View Postsince the bible happen you cannot explain it through science. women are much feeble and weak lil bitches so whyre they still round.
Can someone please translate this to English? Ebonics is not on the list of languages I speak.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
since the bible happen you cannot explain it through science. women are much feeble and weak lil bitches so whyre they still round.




















Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Dragon
Satyr
UnicornIsaiah 43:20 The beast of the field shall honour me, the dragons and the owls: because I give waters in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, to give drink to my people, my chosen.
Isaiah 34:14 The wild beasts of the desert shall also meet with the wild beasts of the island, and the satyr shall cry to his fellow; the screech owl also shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest.
Job 39:8-11 The range of the mountains is his pasture, and he searcheth after every green thing. Will the unicorn be willing to serve thee, or abide by thy crib? Canst thou bind the unicorn with his band in the furrow? or will he harrow the valleys after thee? Wilt thou trust him, because his strength is great? or wilt thou leave thy labour to him?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Hello Miss Nivy. Please stop spreading Lamarckian lies. While inheritance of acquired characteristics is the nicer view of evolution, the Darwinian model of random changes fits the available data.Originally posted by lovesnivy View PostBecause they have been successful hunters in the ocean and haven't been moved a different environment where that would have been beneficial and thus haven't evolved much.
Please provide evidence of that statement.Well because the great flood was on Earth.
That doesn't answer the asked question, which was about stupid humans, not those smart enough to use the aforementioned techniques. Hint: sociobiology is the wrong way to answer this question.Well back then these humans wielded tools, like rocks and things, and could hunt in 'packs'... with sharp rocks.
Again, this is not how evolution works.1 we haven't reached that - and what are you even implying by 'perfection'?
2 third arms are ultimately useless and have no reason to evolve
Sociobiology is not really the correct answer to the asked question.Well maybe if you had little money, had just been raped maybe and/or were in a desperate position would you want extra mouths to feed? Do you want that child to live a bad life or to have a child later on when you have the resources to sustain another human being in the house.
That is not the correct way to answer this question, given that paleontologists claim to be finding remains millions years old.Bodies decay and/or are eaten. This is over 150,000 years, right? So that leaves much time for a lot of bodies to decay and/or be eaten.
No. This lovely community only believes in creatures for which existence there is evidence in the Holy Bible.Why do you believe in mythical creatures?
Again. Why do you believe in mythical creatures?
MYTHICAL CREATURES. ARE YOU GONNA MENTION CENTAURS AND MINOTAURS AND FAIRIES NEXT?!
"Air" is not a scientific term. Technically, troposphere is also air. Your argumentation is invalid and the second part lacks supporting arguments.There's this neat thing called 'air', trees need it too. And I don't think that's possible...
I'm beginning to doubt that.Hm... maybe we do. Maybe we just have higher intelligence.
This is the first sensible thing you've said.Please, this argument? We didn't evolved from monkeys. Us and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor
This is not the correct way to answer this question. A correct way would be to agree that yes, species quite often go extinct with a bang.Notice this usually happens when there's a sudden change in environment or an invasive species? Like us?
Are you implying that the whole Christian religion is based on false premises? That is a strong statement to throw on a religious forum and you'd need a lot of arguments to support such a thesis.Maybe it was because it was written by humans about 1000+ years before evolution was a widely accepting thing?
Nope, it's actually "through."1 it's 'though' not 'threw'.
This is cute, but wrong. You have zero knowledge about the mechanisms of evolution.2 but really, to answer your question... maybe it's because the spiders would still die... except the wasp babies die too. Thus not passing on their genes.
Please explain what that has to do with the original statement.Aaaaaaaand when were they written?Instead of betting, please pay more attention in your biology classes.Well I bet there are, they're just really hard to find. And... uh... logic. Do you even.
This is not a satisfactory answer. You should have included information about weathering mechanisms.You're kidding. You're actually kidding. To answer... well there's still loose soil around and it still rains. Ta da.
Hold your horses. A single study presenting a new hypothesis does not make it true.Mud. And no, mud didn't just turn into a fish, it evolved for millions of year into a fish, except it wasn't mud, it was the tiny single celled organisms in the mud
Nope. We are apes' cousins. Yuge difference.Also, why do babies not have tails? Because we're apes.
Too short to be considered an explanation.Because they're not a brain
Nope. Our ancestors lost fur long before they started thinking about wearing clothes.We call that 'fur'. When we started wearing the superior insulation of animal skin clothing we started not needing fur or body hair so much.
Source of this revelation?2000 years is not worm to human, it's more like 1000000000
When I was growing up, that was the accepted theory.no. Since when did the theory say that?
Oh, because a scientific theory is just a theory, right?No matter, it is a scientific theory after all, we can just change that!
Wrong. You seem to be confusing the meanings of "theory" and "hypothesis." Also, even hypotheses aren't just changed, there is a process called the scientific method for that.
Speculation.I watched a video on this a while back, and it seems we're in the middle of that entropy. Not yet, my friend. Not yet.
It shows.Hm hm. There you go. All answered by a 13 year old girl with very little research.
Please don't try to debunk one sort of beliefs with your own.Also, please don't try to debunk fact with fairytale.
Overall, you get a big fat F. If this was a test, I'd give you a few points for the "we're not monkeys," but you'd loose even more points for "we're apes." 5/100, how does that feel?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostHere is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;
Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?<<<Link to interspecies porn removed by moderator>>>
Because they have been successful hunters in the ocean and haven't been moved a different environment where that would have been beneficial and thus haven't evolved much.
Well because the great flood was on Earth.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostExplain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/
Well back then these humans wielded tools, like rocks and things, and could hunt in 'packs'... with sharp rocks.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
1 we haven't reached that - and what are you even implying by 'perfection'?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
2 third arms are ultimately useless and have no reason to evolveWell maybe if you had little money, had just been raped maybe and/or were in a desperate position would you want extra mouths to feed? Do you want that child to live a bad life or to have a child later on when you have the resources to sustain another human being in the house.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?Bodies decay and/or are eaten. This is over 150,000 years, right? So that leaves much time for a lot of bodies to decay and/or be eaten.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?Why do you believe in mythical creatures?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?Again. Why do you believe in mythical creatures?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.MYTHICAL CREATURES. ARE YOU GONNA MENTION CENTAURS AND MINOTAURS AND FAIRIES NEXT?!Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to meThere's this neat thing called 'air', trees need it too. And I don't think that's possible...Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-RuebenHm... maybe we do. Maybe we just have higher intelligence.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or BetterPlease, this argument? We didn't evolved from monkeys. Us and monkeys evolved from a common ancestorOriginally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldierNotice this usually happens when there's a sudden change in environment or an invasive species? Like us?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.MYTH. I. CAL. CREATURES. NO. NO. YOU MAKE NO SENSE. THESE THINGS... Just... come on, you've gotta be kiddingOriginally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.Maybe it was because it was written by humans about 1000+ years before evolution was a widely accepting thing?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.1 it's 'though' not 'threw'. but it would be pretty funny if God was throwing spiders with anti-wasp poison at waspsOriginally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
2 but really, to answer your question... maybe it's because the spiders would still die... except the wasp babies die too. Thus not passing on their genes.Friend, please, stop referencing fairy tales in the attempt to undermine facts. Evolution has no business in the creation of the human race through God.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.Aaaaaaaand when were they written?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09What's with you and believing in mythical creatures?Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
Well I bet there are, they're just really hard to find. And... uh... logic. Do you even.
You're kidding. You're actually kidding. To answer... well there's still loose soil around and it still rains. Ta da. Mud. And no, mud didn't just turn into a fish, it evolved for millions of year into a fish, except it wasn't mud, it was the tiny single celled organisms in the mud <<<Link to interspecies porn removed by moderator>>>Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostWhy is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
Also, why do babies not have tails? Because we're apes. Not exactly monkeys, but close.Because they're not a brainOriginally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10We call that 'fur'. When we started wearing the superior insulation of animal skin clothing we started not needing fur or body hair so much.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10sttooooop mentioning fairytaaaales in yer questiooonsOriginally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
What was the "evolutionary advantage" of Adam's extra rib?
Why do women have an extra rib than men like the Bible tells us. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07STOOOOOOP, MENTIONING FAAAAAIRYTAAAALES, IN YER QUESTIOOOOONSOriginally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
What is the evolutionary advantage of demonic possession
Please explain how demonic possesions humans, horses, dogs and pigs helps them to be a more successful species. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07no. i believe he was a human, just a regular human, if he existed. 2000 years is not worm to human, it's more like 1000000000Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Do you believe that Jesus was more primitive and less "fit" than today's slugs and worms?
Christ earthly ministery was 2,000 years ago, a more primitive time than now. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07no. Since when did the theory say that? No matter, it is a scientific theory after all, we can just change that!Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
What did the rocks and lightning evolve from?
According to evolutionary theory, all life evolved out of rocks and lightning,Please show the evolutionary linage and transitional forums for rocks and lighting. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07I watched a video on this a while back, and it seems we're in the middle of that entropy. Not yet, my friend. Not yet.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Please show the disorder inherent in evolution
Scientific "laws" regarding thermodynamics and entropy say that things go from ordered to disordered. ?]How do you explain evolution in light of this. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Where are those transitional forms???
asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
Hm hm. There you go. All answered by a 13 year old girl with very little research. Also, please don't try to debunk fact with fairytale.Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Friend - I am answer your question to the best of my ability, because for the DPRK's foundation will on reason and science. However, I will admit, I am no a scientist, and there are many who could have done it better than me.
Friend, the sharks are know that if they did that the might of the Juche socialist spirit and the wisdom of our eternal president would defeat them. Shark are intelligent animal, and to try and attack humans when DPRK has inspires many humans to take action against oppression would be a fool thing to do.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostAccount for the missing land sharks If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
Friend, there is no great flood on Mars. What is happen is NADA go to Mars with big tank of water for thirsty Martian to drink.Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?
Friend, it is not survival of smartest or fittest but of whomever is most adaptable to change. Stupid people are survive because for they are adapt to the capitalist system which will enslave them.Account for fools If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
Friend, your Bible is say "And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell." (Matthew 5:30) If there is such a risk with only two arm, why would you want a third.Explain why human's aren't perfect If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
Friend, first of all, there will a group called "Pro-Life Humanists", made of secular left-wing atheists who are Pro-Life. However, I am not one of them, I am against abortion after 20 week because for then foetus feel pain, however, before that, I can not say foetus will any more alive than mollusc. There are lie you will hear on capitalist mainstream media that in DPRK, we have forced abortion. However, it will exactly that, a lie.Explain infant murder If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
Friend, a corpse will make a decompose when he will dead.Why no bodies? If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
Friend, if an angel or demon will exist, then they will exempt from it because for they will a supernatural being, so can not come from a natural evolution.Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life? Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
Friend, if a snake will make a speech as is say in Genesis 3:1, it is again from supernatural cause, not from a natural evolution, because for a God will give power for snake to make a speech to test obedience of both Adam and Eve.Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution. Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
Friend, I am not believe in Loch Ness Monster, but if he will exist, he will likely a descendant of a plesiosaur.Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution. I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
Friend, a mans will cut down a tree for warmth, and a beast will eat a tree for foodIf evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere? Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall. If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben
Friend, if you are follow western politics you will know it is one big feces-throwing fest.Why don't we act like monkeys If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
Friend, a ape who you will meet today is different from a ape who we has make a descent from. We are share a common grandparent with him.Why are there still monkey? Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
Friend, a capitalist human will kill an animal like these to make a profitPlease account for quick extinctions. According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
Friend, if such animal exist, then they are probably fly off into the spaces and their fossil is on another planet or burn in a star or vanish into black hole never to be seen again. By the way, on the subject of unicorn, you will hear a capitalist say that DPRK state media proclaim the existence of unicorn, but we have done no such thing. Just a reminder not to believe every claim you hear in a mainstream media, and to make your own research.Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn? I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
Friend, how is you not know that Adam and Eve were homo-erect?Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible? The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
Friend, they are evolve to spin a web which can trap a wasp.Explain wasps with evolution. Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
Friend, deformaties can not happen in only a first inbreedings, but only with many generations of inbreedings. Also, how is you not know that God make Cain a wife?How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true? If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
Friend, again, how is you not know that Adam and Eve were homo-erect?The Genealogy of Henry III The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve. Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09
Friend, if you believe in unicorn, I could say it could be used to stab a predator.Unicorn Horns What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
Friend, it will because for an organism will want to skip that stage to save time and speed things up.Transitional fossils for single celled organism. The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
Friend, mud will still around for the same reason that it is for when God is make adam from mud (Genesis 2:7), and we do not have a tail any more because for we does not need it to swing from a tree because for we are not live in a tree but a house.Why is there still mud? Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
Friend, because chemical does not wish to think thought which are dangerous and can lead it to rebellion against DPRK government.Why don't chemicals think? If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
Friend, we have hair which grow out of skin for warm, however, we later evolve to make clothes which are more effective, although capitalism has exploited this and use it to make a profit off an advertisement so that a consumer will buy so many clothing which they do not need.Why don't we have natural clothing? People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
Friend, men and women have same number of rib, a man does not inherit Adam's missing rib. For instance, if a woman is break her nose, her daughter does not inherit her broken nose.What was the "evolutionary advantage" of Adam's extra rib? Why do women have an extra rib than men like the Bible tells us. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
Friend, if you is believe in demonic possession, then it is supernatural and not natural to do with a evolution.What is the evolutionary advantage of demonic possession Please explain how demonic possesions humans, horses, dogs and pigs helps them to be a more successful species. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
Do you believe that Jesus was more primitive and less "fit" than today's slugs and worms? Christ earthly ministery was 2,000 years ago, a more primitive time than now. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
Friend, if you believe Jesus will a God, then no, because for he will a supernatural being, not a natural like a human. Those natural human who are live amongst him will clearly more primitive because for they kill him for have a different idea, which is not commonly found in modern society today, not even in my country, although capitalist media would have you believe otherwise.
Friend, this is confusion. Life evolve from the primordial soup which was struck by a lightning, not from a lightning himself. I am sorry, but I don't know where rock enters the picture, again, I am not a scientist.What did the rocks and lightning evolve from?According to evolutionary theory, all life evolved out of rocks and lightning,Please show the evolutionary linage and transitional forums for rocks and lighting. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
Friend, you pose this question in 2007, however it is now 2016, and after Trump and Brexit I can confirm things are very disorderly.Please show the disorder inherent in evolution Scientific "laws" regarding thermodynamics and entropy say that things go from ordered to disordered. ?]How do you explain evolution in light of this. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
He will be in the White House on Friday 20 January 2017.Where are those transitional forms??? asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07
I hope my answers help! I very much enjoyed answering such challenging and thoughtful question! Thank!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
The point.Originally posted by fat troll emo View PostSo, let's go.I'm just gonna ignore the first one, as it is stupid...
Your head.
Then you must have definitive evidence that angels and demons are not plants. Please present it. I'm sure Mr. White would be very interested in it, for his Creation Studies courses....Evolution applies only to animals and plants, and I'm 100% sure angels and demons aren't plants...
Stop moving the goalposts. It's an argument technique that backfires, only showing how weak your own case is....I was talking about the scientific proof for the talking snake
...
More than you, but that's irrelevant here. I was asking what you base your so-called "knowledge" on....Um, do you know anything at all about space?...
I never claimed that, so stop with the Strawman Arguments. They only make your case look weak....What are the chances that every single monkey in that generation had the exact same mutations? About zero.
What are the chances that every single monkey in that generation had different mutations? About 100% (six+ sigma). Because that's how evolution works.
Stay in school.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
The first what? Are you referring to Didymus' post or something else?Originally posted by fat troll emo View PostSo, let's go.I'm just gonna ignore the first one, as it is stupid.
So? What is the point you're trying to make, exactly?Evolution applies only to animals and plants, and I'm 100% sure angels and demons aren't plants.
You know what talks about scientific proof? People who have no idea about science. Scientists prefer the word "evidence."I was talking about the scientific proof for the talking snake
We know exactly what Jesus wants us to know about it:Um, do you know anything at all about space?
Genesis 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
Ezekiel 1:26 And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it.
What are the chances that every single monkey in that generation had the exact same mutations? About zero.
I'm confused: so are you trying to support or disprove the theory of evolution with this statement?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
So, let's go.I'm just gonna ignore the first one, as it is stupid.
Evolution applies only to animals and plants, and I'm 100% sure angels and demons aren't plants.
I was talking about the scientific proof for the talking snake
Um, do you know anything at all about space?
What are the chances that every single monkey in that generation had the exact same mutations? About zero.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Originally posted by fat troll emo View PostI won't answer all of these, since I actually have better stuff to do, but here's the answer to a few. Why don't we have a third arm? Because in our current state it would not help us in any way or form. Where does angels and demons fit in?
So all of a sudden angels and demons are animals?
Talking snake?
Where's the proof that actually happened?
Why aren't trees up to the stratosphere?
Because there's too little carbon dioxide up there.
Why are there still monkeys?
Because not all monkeys evolved, it all started with just one monkey being mutated, and then that monkey having even more mutated babies and so on and forth, the point is that that monkeys siblings were normal.
An eternity in hell should wipe that smile off your face
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: