[GOD_GUNS_N_GRITS]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

When arguing with athiests on the internet I have found the "caps lock" key to be particularly effective.

GOD IS COMING FROM HEAVEN SOON TO CAST ATHIESTS RETARDS GAYS AND MEERKATS INTO ETERNAL HELLFIRE!!!!!!!!!!

[Brother Temperance]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

No? Okay, you're probably right—you know more about science than us dumb ol' Christians.

I'm curious to know what they are, though.

This vile racist probably thinks that sharks are a sub-species of picaninny. God hates racism!

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

This little demon has been caught in several lies in just the few hours since he slithered in here. I have no doubt that satan sent him here in order to persecute us and spread discord. God hates that.

He is obviously an adherent of the colon cramming anti-Christ collective. I will pray for him and the poor children to whom he has given the AIDS virus.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

That is irrelevant; YOU were not implying first world countries. You said there are no human beings merely surviving. Admit that you are culpably ignorant so that you can begin to change in Christ.

This little demon has been caught in several lies in just the few hours since he slithered in here. I have no doubt that satan sent him here in order to persecute us and spread discord. God hates that.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

you were obsviously implying 1st world countries

That is irrelevant; YOU were not implying first world countries. You said there are no human beings merely surviving. Admit that you are culpably ignorant so that you can begin to change in Christ.

[DerpHerpBurp]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

This Derp fellow really really really needs to know what he is talking about before he rants about various things he has read in those QI books by the devil worshipper faggot Stephen Fry. If I were some sort of crazy atheist I'd want to have my "facts" straight before I made myself look like an idiot by not even understanding the science I'm trying to champion.

He's all over the place and it's not remotely consistent or convincing. An embarrassment, to be frank.


Romans 11:33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!

And here we see true wisdom on the subject. No wonder this one is making a fool of himself trying to act like he has an answer for everything because he read a few books and watched Discovery Channel.





Do you ever come out of mommy's basement and stop watching the TV?

you were obsviously implying 1st world countries

have you ever seen any american with all the amenities we have today

take for example you, are you surviving right now? no you're not worrying about what you will do tonight for dinner or die, you will probably go cook something out of your pantry

I never get as angry with these superstitious fools as I do with people like you! At least they are honest about whay they are wrong about so many things.

The reason all vertebrate land animals only have two arms is because we are all variations on the same skeleton. We evolved from animals that crawled on all fours. It has nothing to do with what is desireable. The genes within us for growing a skeleton don't magically warp to grow extra bits; they just provide variations in the dimensions of different bones. Variations are then favoured or not favoured depending on the environment. Over time this leads to new characteristics in the phenotype becoming more abundant.

There simply isn't scope here to go into just how wrong you actually are.

Please stop talking with authority on stuff you clearly don't understand. It's a totally horrible thing to watch someone doing.

You skewed what I was saying "desirable" doesn't apply to the First person sense of a human acknowledging that a 3rd arm would be desirable, the desire come from better equipped for survival, and since humans are already quite humble in what we do now is not surviving but rather living comfortable in our homes and not africans in tribes

[The Humanist]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

- we don't have third or 4th arms because maybe that wasn't a desirable trait or it was not efficient like 2 arms are now, an arm is a massive addition when it comes to evolution, obtaining a 3rd without compromising millions of potential human species at once would take millions and millions of more years

I never get as angry with these superstitious fools as I do with people like you! At least they are honest about whay they are wrong about so many things.

The reason all vertebrate land animals only have two arms is because we are all variations on the same skeleton. We evolved from animals that crawled on all fours. It has nothing to do with what is desireable. The genes within us for growing a skeleton don't magically warp to grow extra bits; they just provide variations in the dimensions of different bones. Variations are then favoured or not favoured depending on the environment. Over time this leads to new characteristics in the phenotype becoming more abundant.

There simply isn't scope here to go into just how wrong you actually are.

Please stop talking with authority on stuff you clearly don't understand. It's a totally horrible thing to watch someone doing.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

....stop watching the TV?

I'm glad I never watch TV - occasionally someone will record something & make me look at it

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

This Derp fellow really really really needs to know what he is talking about before he rants about various things he has read in those QI books by the devil worshipper faggot Stephen Fry. If I were some sort of crazy atheist I'd want to have my "facts" straight before I made myself look like an idiot by not even understanding the science I'm trying to champion.

He's all over the place and it's not remotely consistent or convincing. An embarrassment, to be frank.


Romans 11:33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!

And here we see true wisdom on the subject. No wonder this one is making a fool of himself trying to act like he has an answer for everything because he read a few books and watched Discovery Channel.

...we don't survive anymore, we live. There is no survival living as a human today

Do you ever come out of mommy's basement and stop watching the TV?

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

ALSO SHARKS ARE NOT FISH

No? Okay, you're probably right—you know more about science than us dumb ol' Christians.

I'm curious to know what they are, though. Off to Wikipedia...

[DerpHerpBurp]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

Going on a new direction, you can always show atheists the Atheist's Nightmare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504

May all the unholy atheists rot in hell.

WOW its the Peanut butter Skadoo

Life doesn't form instantly, it took millions of years

if you think a jar of peanut butter will spawn life on the instant, then you've got another thing coming.

Try a deep sea volcanic area teaming with complex molecules, theres plenty of energy and plenty of complex bonding.

why do you think a jar of peanut butter some how disproves everything?

Video from Ezekiel

-sharks environment never changed enough for them to be pushed toward adapting to a land environment, they are vertebrates, so the are related to us in some form, ALSO SHARKS ARE NOT FISH

-mars' water froze and dissipated, and it didn't have much of an atmosphere because of the lack of gravity to hold the gas in. Also, there is no evidence of a massive flood on mars, there is evidence of water and oceans was present there at one time millions of years ago.

-humans lived because of our intelligence grew to basically learn how to survive and then taught our own children how to survive, and we became more efficient at it, kind of like how bears teach their cubs how to hunt

-humans are not perfect because there is no such thing as perfect, lol

- we don't have third or 4th arms because maybe that wasn't a desirable trait or it was not efficient like 2 arms are now, an arm is a massive addition when it comes to evolution, obtaining a 3rd without compromising millions of potential human species at once would take millions and millions of more years

-angels don't fit in, because there is no place for them as they were/are never interact with evolution, implying they exist

-Monkeys STILL exist because Evolution is a tree, not a chain, humans and monkeys share a common ancestor that split off long ago

-we don't behave like them because we don't survive anymore, we live. There is no survival living as a human today

-just because some (fictional) characters who are related mate, doesn't mean their offspring millions of years later, or even your 6000 will be inbred. There would have been enough change to cause inbredness to cease by your logic

-unicorns don't exist

-I don't understand the question after unicorns and how kill or be killed has anything to do with it

-it doesn't, evolution wasn't written to describe miracles

-rocks don't evolve, they are rocks, they are non living, Lightning doesn't evolve, it is a massive jump in electrons called static electricity

-what does trees growing into space have to do with evolution? in the evolution of trees, maybe its not beneficial to grow that high.

-trees can't grow everywhere, humans also have deforested a lot of them

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

Try and answer my questions in this devistating video I made. No atheist has ever succeeded in answering any of these!

[DerpHerpBurp]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

The problem we face is that atheists are just blind to the world around them. There is clearly a designer. You just have to look at the complexity of the human eye. Every part of our bodies is designed perfectly by Him. Just look at the human leg, it is exactly the right length to allow the foot to reach the floor.

These things don't happen just by chance,

YiC

Jack

no, nothing is perfect in the body

if the body was perfect, we could

-breathe any form of gas, including chlorine
-never get sick and never die
-never acquire disease
-never become fatigued
-never need to sleep

legs are not perfect and your leg example is poor, if the leg is perfect then why does it hurt so damn much when you stub your toe or bang your knee?

If the lungs are perfect, how come we can't process Mustard Gas?

How come we can't process Nitric Acid? it is a gas and if it enters your lungs, it will literally burn a hole in your body.

How come people get bronchitis if the lung is so perfectly defended?

How come people die of disease if you think the immune system is so perfectly resistant?

How come, heres the kicker, that if God prefers humans SO much, that he gave almost every other animal better speed, strength, sight, smell, and instincts?

Cats have better smell, sight, and vision at night than humans by far, so do dogs.

Gorillas have multiple times the strength. A baby gorilla has the instinct to stay off the ground because predators lurk

[DerpHerpBurp]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

The problem we face is that atheists are just blind to the world around them. There is clearly a designer. You just have to look at the complexity of the human eye. Every part of our bodies is designed perfectly by Him. Just look at the human leg, it is exactly the right length to allow the foot to reach the floor.

These things don't happen just by chance,

YiC

Jack

Thats not design, we know how the eye developed

First, light sensitive cells form, giving light sensing

then light sensitive cells congregate into a tissue, giving direction

then the tissue becomes con-caved, this creates a lens, and the brain is able to create an image with the eye.

this is a very broad generalization but the key evens are here

simply saying "the eye is too complex, therefore a creator did it" is just ignorant and doesn't make you look like you want to try and discover more.

[Magnus Democritus]

Re: How do I beat an atheist in argument.

Going on a new direction, you can always show atheists the Atheist's Nightmare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504

May all the unholy atheists rot in hell.