X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Exiled
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    hm..I've never touched a women's coccis...and I don't know if they have one (because I won't touch there a women,it's unpolite and rude)

    well...maybe you're right,but I still believe on the theory of evolution,as it's a solid fact...

    but not alll animals has got tail,and having a tail isn't a bad things,since we are also animals

    but I feel like I should meditate about,I'll think about it...maybe you are right,maybe not...hope to reach enough wisdom to know

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by The Exiled View Post
    but,it's a fact...how can you negate it? it's like negating the existence of gravity,or the existence of air,because it's written in a book

    I give evidences,can you give me any evidence showing that we don't came from animals?

    PS: I'm talking about heir,not hair...and waste is stored somewhere,this place is the large intestin,and the appendix stores more "poisonous and harder" substances...but as we evolved,it becomed smaller and smaller...and now it's a bad thing to have it,we can remove it...even more,infection causes death

    do you see it now?

    PS2: I'm not talking about touching the ass of no body...I'm talking about the end of the spine,the coccis is the remainings of the tail we had...is it so dificult for you to look at? I don't think having a tail is so bad...look at na'vi people lol
    God created mankind & animals. It is in the Bible. Here are the verses

    Genesis 1
    24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
    25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
    26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
    27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    I said waste comes from your bottom. So why are you disagreeing. Only men have coccis, women have something different. Why would you want a tail, only animals and demons have tails.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exiled
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    but,it's a fact...how can you negate it? it's like negating the existence of gravity,or the existence of air,because it's written in a book

    I give evidences,can you give me any evidence showing that we don't came from animals?

    PS: I'm talking about heir,not hair...and waste is stored somewhere,this place is the large intestin,and the appendix stores more "poisonous and harder" substances...but as we evolved,it becomed smaller and smaller...and now it's a bad thing to have it,we can remove it...even more,infection causes death

    do you see it now?

    PS2: I'm not talking about touching the ass of no body...I'm talking about the end of the spine,the coccis is the remainings of the tail we had...is it so dificult for you to look at? I don't think having a tail is so bad...look at na'vi people lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by The Exiled View Post
    Touch* sorry

    As I was saying,cellulose is very hard to break,and a lot of waste is produced,so a "waste dump" is needed...but as we eat meat,we don't need it,and it causes infection...it's another bestial heir
    Thats very rude wanting True Christian people to touch their bottoms. Of course waste comes out of your bottom, thats why there is toilet paper. I don't know about other people but I do not have beast hair there.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exiled
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by The Exiled View Post
    tough yourself at the end of your spine
    Touch* sorry

    As I was saying,cellulose is very hard to break,and a lot of waste is produced,so a "waste dump" is needed...but as we eat meat,we don't need it,and it causes infection...it's another bestial heir

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by The Exiled View Post
    As I say,we all came from animals,and animals came from unicelular beings...it's a fact,like gravity

    I'm a biologist,I know about those things,tough yourself at the end of your spine,that's the remains of a tail,believe me,it's true!

    And appendix...I'll explain...the appendix is a useless organ nowadays,used only for the storage of waster...the important things is that it's a very important organ on vegetarian animals,as plants are very dificult to diger,due to de celular wall,made up of C...among other elements
    God created mankind and animals. It is in the Bible.

    At the end of the spine is your bottom, the thing you sit on. Sometimes non-Christian men touch mine so I give them a slap.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exiled
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    As I say,we all came from animals,and animals came from unicelular beings...it's a fact,like gravity

    I'm a biologist,I know about those things,tough yourself at the end of your spine,that's the remains of a tail,believe me,it's true!

    And appendix...I'll explain...the appendix is a useless organ nowadays,used only for the storage of waster...the important things is that it's a very important organ on vegetarian animals,as plants are very dificult to diger,due to de celular wall,made up of C...among other elements

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by The Exiled View Post
    Nope,we have tail,you can see it (well not see...tocuh it) at the end of the spine,this is called coccis,and it's a "bestial heir",part of something that was a tail,but thanks to evolution,it dissapeared

    the same with some organs,like the appendix,another bestial heir
    Only animals and demons have tails. I do not have beast hair and people have an appendix.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exiled
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Nope,we have tail,you can see it (well not see...tocuh it) at the end of the spine,this is called coccis,and it's a "bestial heir",part of something that was a tail,but thanks to evolution,it dissapeared

    the same with some organs,like the appendix,another bestial heir

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by The Exiled View Post
    we have tails,but very short ones

    evolution theory is real,religion can't beat the solid evidences of science

    but science can't feed the soul,however

    so...can science and religion be friends?

    that's my question
    Mankind does not have tails. That is just silly. Science is a mockery of the Lord and all his teachings.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exiled
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    we have tails,but very short ones

    evolution theory is real,religion can't beat the solid evidences of science

    but science can't feed the soul,however

    so...can science and religion be friends?

    that's my question

    Leave a comment:


  • TravisDK
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Dingleberry View Post
    I hope that I helped you guys with your questions

    I didn't see you answering my question(s) ???

    Leave a comment:


  • Dingleberry
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Sister Mary Maria View Post
    I was thinking about this today. According to the Darwinists, we came from monkeys. Monkeys have tails. So if why came from monkeys, why don't we have tails? WHERE IS MY TAIL, EVILUTIONISTS?!? I don't have one! 100% PROOF that EVILUTION IS A LIE!!!
    Because tails were not necessary for us to have anymore so as we evolved our tails would have shrunk and shrunk until they no longer were there.

    Originally posted by Bob4God View Post
    You know I have never met an evolutionist who could honestly and intelligently answer that question?

    Another thing I'd like to know is, if humans came from monkeys, how come there aren't monkeys giving birth to humans to this day?
    Why would that happen?
    Evolution takes a long long long time, it is not that instantanious

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    I'd also like to know what the atheists say to this: If humans "evolved" from monkeys, how come there are still monkeys in the world? Why didn't the ones in the zoo turn into humans?
    Because it was just one specific species of monkey, not just all monkeys in general

    Originally posted by James Dewitt View Post
    If humans have evolved from monkeys, why don't monkeys speak American?
    I think you mean English?

    I hope that I helped you guys with your questions

    Leave a comment:


  • TravisDK
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    And another thing....

    Scientists claim that the the universe is approx. 13.7 billion years old based on the speed of the expansion and its current size.

    However, unless the universe has gravitational attraction exactly balanced against this expansion it will either collapse in a Big Crunch or expand too quickly for us to survive in it.

    The evidence shows that only with a young universe can this problem be resolved which totally contradicts the Big Bang.

    Leave a comment:


  • TravisDK
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by F. Nietzsche View Post
    It's not too complex. Just that it's almost impossible to know since before the Big Bang, time itself did not exist, meaning that the concept of "cause and effect" that we observe did not exist, which in turn means our physical models based off "cause and effect" don't work before a fraction of the second after the Big Bang.
    So you can just "switch off" the laws of physics when it suits your argument? How convenient

    So explain this to me:

    For the big bang theory to work there are two basic assumptions made: the Copernican Principle and an unbounded universe. These two are only philosophical models, that has never been proven right. I fact, all evidence suggests they are wrong.

    If they are wrong, so is every conclusion ever made about a universe based on a big expansion of space and time.

    Leave a comment:

Working...