[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Oh .. .. .. are these the ones who say, “If Daniel saw a statue on day 43 then 300 days after that (a prophetic day being a year or something but they never justify that claim) then that's 300 years and a month and a half after an eclipse of the sun = Nero and the 400th year (a prophetic year is 3⅓ actual years) = 1,333 years 4 months after Nero but Enoch was translated directly to Heaven in a single day which is 1,000 years so that's 2,333 years and four months but those months are not complete years and need to be subtracted as 122 prophetic days giving 2,333 – 122 = 2,211 years after the Maccabean revolution which is 2044 AD ?

I think I've heard them on the car radio when driving along. Not even Jesus knows that!

Mark 13:31-33 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. Take ye heed, watch and pray: for ye know not when the time is.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

What is it exactly that's supposed to happen on the seventh day? Anyone know? Does it mean that Jesus began on the seventh day? Or are they supposed to go to Church? They actually do that on the sixth day I thought.

[WWJDnow]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Welcome, Mr. Gooch. Seventh Day Advents, did you leave because they have bad math?

I think their math is OK, but they lost track of a single day somewhere along the line, so now they celebrate the Sabbath one day early.

Sure, they have some lunatic doctrines, and they keep making bad predictions of when Christ will return, but I attribute that to the various Arian doctrines they adopted early on, including the worst of all, the vegetarian doctrine, which leaves them malnourished. But now that they accept the Trinity, Satan has less hold over their "church" than he used to.

All-in-all, I think it will be a pretty good horserace to see if they start worshipping God before the Rapture happens. Either way, it definitely won't happen on whatever day the Seventh Day Adventists say it will.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Hello Landover.
I am new.
I live in the UK, and was an SDA for 10 years.

Welcome, Mr. Gooch. Seventh Day Advents, did you leave because they have bad math?

[James Hutchins]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Hello Landover.
I am new.
I live in the UK, and was an SDA for 10 years.
I am here to show why the middle chapter of the 1189 chapters is also the shortest.
The goals of the purpose are 1 God exists, 2 Jesus also, 3 The not ok one does as well and 4 that God allows and dis allows the not ok one, as He is mostly, if not entirely a step ahead of the not ok ones.

Welcome, Mr. Cooch.
First of all, this is NOT a debate forum. We're right and you're wrong, according to Jesus and the Holy Word of God. Please read THIS thread before making an even bigger fool of yourself.

Secondly, while the internets might seem to be "free" to you, this particular corner of the internets is a privately owned Christian forum. The rights you have on this forum are listed HERE. Please contact a Pastor immediately if you feel that any of your rights have been violated.

Finally, your unsaved opinions or tantrums are not even slightly of interest to us. We follow the Holy Word of God TO THE LETTER, and make no apologies for that. One of the most important commandments in the Bible tells us to avoid unsaved scum such as yourself. You wandered in here uninvited, and unwelcome .

If you want to debate people, THIS is the place to go.

Please make a thread of your own in the "Introductions" section of the forum, so that we can properly greet you. Tell us about yourself, your church, and how you came to find Jesus.

And if you're here to flame us, better take a look at THIS before making an even bigger ass out of yourself.

I will pray that the Holy Spirit enter you and chase the demons out of your rectum and let Jesus fill you with His Grace. If you use your God-given free will to reject Christ and His temporary death on the cross for my sins, then you are sending yourself to hellfire.

[Isabella White]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Hello Landover.
I am new.
I live in the UK, and was an SDA for 10 years.
I am here to show why the middle chapter of the 1189 chapters is also the shortest.
The goals of the purpose are 1 God exists, 2 Jesus also, 3 The not ok one does as well and 4 that God allows and dis allows the not ok one, as He is mostly, if not entirely a step ahead of the not ok ones.

Hello, dear Mr. Gooch. I must thank you for your throughful post, as it is most interesting. I should also mention that we prefer it when our newcomers post an introductory message over at our friendly Introduction Forum. The purpose of this is that it is easier for our members to welcome you, as your very own thread will be at the top of the list. And, we do like to keep things as organized as possible here. The link to that forum is here:

https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=16

Whilst there, kindly note our simple requests at the top of the page. I shall include them here, too:

The introduction forum Attention Unsaved Trash: This the ONLY subforum you can start threads in. Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

We look forward to getting to know you, Dear.

[handmaiden]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Hello Landover.

This statement was grammatically correct. Praise God in the highest.

I am new.

A simple statement, also grammatically correct, but it demonstrates that you should have posted this in its own thread in the Introduction sub-forum, not here in the Creation Science sub-forum.

I live in the UK, and was an SDA for 10 years.
I am here to show why the middle chapter of the 1189 chapters is also the shortest.
The goals of the purpose are 1 God exists, 2 Jesus also, 3 The not ok one does as well and 4 that God allows and dis allows the not ok one, as He is mostly, if not entirely a step ahead of the not ok ones.

All of this other stuff here suggests that English is NOT your first language. Can't be helped, I suppose. You live in the UK.

[John Gooch]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Hello Landover.
I am new.
I live in the UK, and was an SDA for 10 years.
I am here to show why the middle chapter of the 1189 chapters is also the shortest.
The goals of the purpose are 1 God exists, 2 Jesus also, 3 The not ok one does as well and 4 that God allows and dis allows the not ok one, as He is mostly, if not entirely a step ahead of the not ok ones.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

You mean inside a whales stomach? Human would be digested in there.

See, this is just the sort of arrogant stupidity that science was invented to stop. What do you really, really know about whales, stomachs, digestion, or the toughness of Jonah? Do you even know which book of the Bible talks about these things?

You, a total non-expert on all these things, just said "well, it sounds true" and decided to be opinionated based on that.

So if a total non-expert on aircraft, physics, and in-flight snacks just scribbled together a blueprint for an airplane, and said "well, it looks like it will fly", would you volunteer to be on the maiden flight?

No, of course you wouldn't. When your skin is on the line, when your butt is likely to be the one falling from the sky in a rain of flaming jet fuel and small packets of mediocre pretzels, suddenly "it sounds right" isn't good enough.

Things are complicated. Things are not only more complicated than you imagine, they are more complicated than most people CAN imagine. You need people who sweated bullets to learn the facts. You need obsessive nerds who spend sleepless blue-balled nights studying everything that can go wrong. You need people who say "it looks good enough, but WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY?"

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

"It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man." —Psalm 118:8

"Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD." —Jeremiah 17:5

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

You mean inside a whales stomach? Human would be digested in there.
I'm pretty sure that on most of the cases the human or the whale would die.

Those who scoff at, doubt or otherwise ridicule the book of Jonah are in actuality doubting Christ's own integrity. Jesus believed and taught that Jonah was a real person, and that the events described in the KJV1611 really did happen to him.

I believe the account of Jonah as literal history, but more importantly Christ believed it and I would trust His judgement over yours any day.

Christ read with authority not as the scribes.

YIC,

Mrs.P.Wintersnow

[Oompa-loompa]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

I hope that God judges actions like you are performing.

[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

We talked about living inside a whale not going through it.

My GOD-given wisdom remains the same: you are indigestible. I know this as your posts make my bowels cramp in a most unladylike fashion. You could live inside a whale for an entire month and survive, as your unnaturally tiny size requires very little breathable air. Your midgetness would enable you to slither through the whale's system easily, until you, much like the day you hatched from your mother's anus, shoot out of the whale's bottom. I stand by my early statement that you would both survive this very minor ordeal.

Idiot...

I heard that, sonny!

[Oompa-loompa]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

Not necessarily ... in your case, you would give a whale terrible indigestion; however, your small size would enable you to pass through the whale speedily, and pop out of it's anus fairly intact. You would both survive.

We talked about living inside a whale not going through it. Idiot...

[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: The Scientific Method for Christians

You mean inside a whales stomach? Human would be digested in there.

I'm pretty sure that on most of the cases the human or the whale would die.

Not necessarily ... in your case, you would give a whale terrible indigestion; however, your small size would enable you to pass through the whale speedily, and pop out of it's anus fairly intact. You would both survive.