[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

De:21:12: Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;

OK, you believe now? Your Faith has been restored? Or are you simply a mindless atheist denying everything you can't understand?

you are missing the point, what i'm saying is that just because something isn't in the bible dosen't mean it dosen't exist. I will admit i made a poor choice for an example. but let me give you another. GOOGLE. try to find that in a bible. if god is omnipotent he should have mentioned something about google.

actually you deny all you can't understand (denying science that you have little to no grasp of), i accept that there are many thing i will not understand in my lifetime, but that does not stop me from trying to understand them. i don't fully know how every part of a car works, but i don't deny that a car exists.

[Chris T]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

but let me give you another. GOOGLE. try to find that in a bible. if god is omnipotent he should have mentioned something about google.

You have turned from monkey worship to google worship?

Exodus 20:3 - Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Enjoy hell, heathen, I know me and Jesus are going to enjoy watching you burn!

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1) there are several theories within abiogenesis science, but just because something is difficult, it dosen't mean it is impossible, as you said "they bond with h2o easier" but that doesen't mean they won't bond with others. however as i have said previously, i am not a scientist and only have a basic understanding of abiogenesis.

3) actually the earth's magnetic field is only involved in one dating method. and this method is only used by young earth creationists. radiometric dating has nothing to do with the magnetic field of the planet.

4) what, imagine i am in court and i said that abiogenesis and evolution are to seperate theories. i don't think i would get laughed at, mainly because the statement is true. the problem is that people often confuse evolution with abiogenesis, and cosmology.
i will seperate these for you.
Cosmology is about the origins of the universe.
Abiogenesis is about the origins of life on earth
Evolution is about how groups of already living things change over time.

they are all seperate theories.

1. go study your physcis more.

3. dude, it is the earth magnetic field that causes the decay..

=.=

4. and what will the judge say "it's all false!". Show me evidences of all those that happen.

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1. go study your physcis more.

3. dude, it is the earth magnetic field that causes the decay..

=.=

4. and what will the judge say "it's all false!". Show me evidences of all those that happen.

The half-life of a nuclide depends solely on its nuclear properties; it is not affected by external factors such as temperature, pressure, chemical environment, or presence of a magnetic or electric field.

maybe the judge would say that "it's all false", if he was a creationist. but there are also judges that believe in evolution, and people that believe in evolution, and around 95% of the scientific comunity say evolution is correct. (oh, and that study is not seperating those who only study things related to evolution, it is ALL scientists, so of that 5%, not all even study biology)
evidance of evolution
-fossil records
-biology
-genetics
and many others.
what evidance do you have for creation? oh... right.... a book.

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

You have turned from monkey worship to google worship?

Exodus 20:3 - Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Enjoy hell, heathen, I know me and Jesus are going to enjoy watching you burn!

how am i a google worshipper? i simply asked if the bible said anything about google. because by the logic previously presented you cant believe in it if its not in the bible.

[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

how am i a google worshipper? i simply asked if the bible said anything about google. because by the logic previously presented you cant believe in it if its not in the bible.

Did the Origin of Species mention google?

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

Did the Origin of Species mention google?

The Origin's of Species was a book written about a single specific topic (natural selection), where as the bible is suposedly the literal word of god. and as it was claimed the bible says nothing about abiogenesis, it also says nothing about google, so if abiogenesis is not real because it's not in the bible, than google must not be real either.

[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

The Origin's of Species was a book written about a single specific topic (natural selection), where as the bible is suposedly the literal word of god. and as it was claimed the bible says nothing about abiogenesis, it also says nothing about google, so if abiogenesis is not real because it's not in the bible, than google must not be real either.

Are you intentionally missing the point?

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

Are you intentionally missing the point?

ok, no the origins of species didn't mention google, now tell me, what significance does that have.

and by the way you seem to be missing the point of my original post aswell. i'll ask again.
does the bible say anything about google?

[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

ok, no the origins of species didn't mention google, now tell me, what significance does that have.

and by the way you seem to be missing the point of my original post aswell. i'll ask again.
does the bible say anything about google?

No, I'm not missing your point. You don't even have a point. It's just a useless red herring.

No, the Bible does not mention google (though it does predict the internet) and no it doesn't mention all the other billions of brand names, domain names, websites, trademarks, and all the other inventions in the world. Maybe the Prophets were too busy writing the WORD OF GOD down and exacting GOD's judgement upon the infidels to bother making a trade index catalog for the future.

It's not about what the Bible doesn't say. What you don't seem to be able to grasp is what the Bible does say. It directly contradicts evilution or abominablegenesis or whatever the latest theory-of-the-week might be.

It is explicitly written how the world was made and how life was formed in the Bible. It's the first book of the Bible, if you didn't notice. It's on the first page.

Get it? Good.

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

It's not about what the Bible doesn't say. What you don't seem to be able to grasp is what the Bible does say. It directly contradicts evilution or abominablegenesis or whatever the latest theory-of-the-week might be.

It is explicitly written how the world was made and how life was formed in the Bible. It's the first book of the Bible, if you didn't notice. It's on the first page.

Get it? Good.

Well i'll give you this. Yes the bible contradicts abiogenesis and evolution. but the reality is that the bible is the only evidence for creation that anybody can come up with. science keeps looking for evidance and solutions to the questions of the universe. all creationists do is sit and hold their bibles tightly screaming "YOU CAN'T SHAKE MY FAITH" over and over so they don't have to hear any of the evidance. and when asked to prove the bibles validity you resort so circular logic, which prooves nothing accept that said person is without logic, because a logical person is inteligent enough to grasp the idiocy of whats being said. your story of creation is no more scientificly or logicaly valid than the muslims, hindues, natives, norse, greek, or pastafarian stories. and in all actuallity the pastafarian story makes more sence than yours because it explains why there are so many scientific contradictions to its story. but i wouldn't expect any of this to change your mind because you have been completely blinded by your faith.
"blind faith is an ironic gift for the creater of human intalligance"
"faith dosen't anwser questions, it stops them from being asked"

[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

but the reality is that the bible is the only evidence for creation that anybody can come up with.

Yes, an exhaustive testimony to the wisdom of GOD, spanning generations, full of undeniable historical accuracy, supported by objective verifiable evidence, voiced through many different prophets, from different eras, who’s prophecies have all come to pass, or are coming to pass right now, or are due in the very near future, written thousands of years ago before any knoweldge of these things... is the only evidence we have to contradict your fledgling theories and philosophies that you can’t even agree on yourselves and are as yet unproven, and likely never will be proven.

Yes, we are the 'blind' ones.

[Brother Helge]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

your story of creation is no more scientificly or logicaly valid than the muslims, hindues, natives, norse, greek, or pastafarian stories.

In what way does named phony religions support Evilution?
Even the towelheads admits that God created heaven end earth.

[paula]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

So...how does this disprove evolution? The fact that a non-organic, non-living thing did not spontaneously appear is odd somehow?

No, what you did does absolutely nothing to disprove evolution. Life comes from organic components. Cars don't.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

So...how does this disprove evolution? The fact that a non-organic, non-living thing did not spontaneously appear is odd somehow?

No, what you did does absolutely nothing to disprove evolution. Life comes from organic components. Cars don't.

So where did these magic organic components come from? He didn't find a new life form in there either.