Re: 3 Experiments You Can Do At Home that PROVE THE EARTH IS FLAT
So a Bachelors in Mathematics? AND Physics? By the way, if you have a BSc in Physics, why would you feel you must mention your Associates degree? I mean I have an Associates in Accounting, but I don't even bother to put it on my resume because I carried onto my BBA.
Hold it, haven't you just spent the last 10 pages saying that Gravity was a fact and we were all idiots for saying it was a theory?
Brother COM gave you the dictionary's meaning, but of course according to you, the dictionary is wrong. 
Uh-huh. Ivy leauge scientists are idiots if they don't agree with some math teacher. Yeah, I'm sure he'll be burning his degree over that.
Well fortunately, although done in my youth when I was a much softer Christian, I understood where the BS in BSc came from. I just learned to regurgitate what they told me no matter how wrong it was.
But didn't you just say that a Dr. of Physics was an idiot? So obviously you do not agree with everything that scientists say.
Exactly! He understands it better than some math teacher.
Actually it was Dr. Shempp that said it was a religion, as for technology, you're the one claiming that only members of YOUR religion are allowed to have them.
No, I just don't call anyone that disagrees with me an idiot.
Well glad to see you admitting you're not a member of the Scientific Community. So tell me oh wise one, what did cause the big bang.
I know the answer. God Spoke, and BANG!
Never heard of it, looked it up, it's an "institute", for the mentally handicapped perhaps?
All ready told you.
Where have I lied. Calling an idiot an idiot is a statement of fact, not an insult.
So I don't have a degree, Dr. Shempp is an idiot, the only person who really understands physics is some math teacher.
Please explain why highschool graduates these days thing that -7+5=-12? Yes I have met these people and they got A's in their "public education".
Ah, so the elementary math teacher knows more about science than the scientist. I've seen what comes out of the public school system. Being a teacher is not something I'd be proud of.
I have, others have, ignoring the truth is not going to help you.
Wow really? With everything you've said, I thought you would be.
Been on a plane, never noticed any curve.
Projecting what? You're the one who has admitted that you don't have a degree in any science, yet you claim to know more than someone with a BSc. and a Doctoral
If you went to either school, then please, explain to me why you don't know what the definition of word "theory" is in the context of science.
I know that a scientific theory can never be proven true. If it could be proven then it becomes "the law of....". Your definition seems to be that theory and fact are the exact same thing.
Whatever you call yourself you obviously don't believe in God so you're an atheist.
Jeremiah 16:19:
O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.
According to Jeremiah 16:19, the earth has ends. There is no way a spherical earth could have ends, and therefore the earth must be flat. The Book of Revelation tells a similar story:
Revelation 7:1:
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
A spherical earth cannot have corners, it is scientifically impossible. The only logical explanation is that the earth is flat. Checkmate atheists!
Isaiah 40:22:
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
Originally posted by Physics!
View Post
Yes, Gravity is a theory.
I think the misunderstanding here is that you don't actually know what theory means.

Whoever wrote the article you linked to was either writing it as a joke, or the author was an idiot.
I find it very hard to believe that you have a BSc, considering you don't know what the word theory means.
According to everything the human race knows about science.
If Dr. Shempp did indeed write that article, then he was writing it as a joke. There's no way a physicist would not understand what the word theory means.
You're the one insisting science is a religion, not me. If you really think it is, then have nothing at all to do with it, and get rid of your car, your computer, your house, any electronic device you own, ect.
You have a serious problem with reading comprehension, it seems.
No one in the scientific community believe that the universe started "from nothing".
Just because we don't currently know all of the answers doesn't mean the whole system is flawed. I may not know how it happened, but I do know it was "from nothing".
Just because we don't currently know all of the answers doesn't mean the whole system is flawed. I may not know how it happened, but I do know it was "from nothing".
I know the answer. God Spoke, and BANG!
RPI
Oh really? And where exactly did you get your degree?
First you claim you didn't insult me, and then you come back with this when I point out you did? I seem to remember something about not lying in the bible...
Further proof you don't actually have a degree. If you did, you'd know what science actually is. Repeatedly spouting this inane hogwash won't make it true.
Please explain why highschool graduates these days thing that -7+5=-12? Yes I have met these people and they got A's in their "public education".
No; you've "backed up" your position by linking to an article written by someone who doesn't know what the word theory means, and then tried to use his credentials to make your position look infallible. That's known as a logical fallacy called "appeal to authority". Which, actually, doesn't back up your position at all.
While technically, volcanoes could exist on a flat Earth, I used other points to address the non-flatness of the Earth. Perhaps you could try responding to some of those for once?
I'm not an astronaut, a professional weight lifter, a black belt in any discipline, and I've never won the Nobel prize.
Astronauts aren't the only ones allowed in planes, you know.

But please, it's painfully obvious now that you're lying about earning your degree. Stop projecting your own insecurity about being found out onto me. Thank you.
If you went to either school, then please, explain to me why you don't know what the definition of word "theory" is in the context of science.
I never said I was an atheist.
Jeremiah 16:19:
O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.
According to Jeremiah 16:19, the earth has ends. There is no way a spherical earth could have ends, and therefore the earth must be flat. The Book of Revelation tells a similar story:
Revelation 7:1:
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
A spherical earth cannot have corners, it is scientifically impossible. The only logical explanation is that the earth is flat. Checkmate atheists!
Isaiah 40:22:
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
Comment