[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Here was my point: x



Here is where you are: x

Next time wear stilts so that the point doesn't go over your head.

Right..
Your knowledge and your so-called "points" are on par with Nirvash's..

You said:

Chemical changes can make something incredibly volatile become incredibly docile. However, since chemical change doesn't exist according to you, the beef I consume should make me sick from the E. Coli, and I should be eating raw eggs and sugar instead of a baked cake. Yet sadly, I'm not, because chemical change saved my life.

So obviously, you actually thought cake was a chemical compound.
As I said, you're on par with Nirvash.

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

An explosion doesn't need to involve fire, you total fool.
And in case you didn't know (can't be too sure with you): Fire doesn't equal an explosion either.

And stop acting like you didn't say what you actually said.
That you're an uneducated moron has been established before, but this time you can't dodge it. Everyone who isn't an uneducated mormon themselves can see it now, from reading the nonsense you actually thought! (And maybe STILL think?)
You said an explosion was:

exploding is when a chemical reaction takes compound(s) and turns it into another.

And that is still complete BS.
Friend, if you're going to claim "science = truth" then I suggest that you actually learn it first..

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

We know from the Bible (KJV1611) that sinners like you are going to burn for eternity in the lake of fire. Now whether there is a lot of hydrogen and oxygen around for this to happen, or whether it is just a giant steam explosion does not make a great deal of difference - the end result is the same. Once again "science" has proven itself to be an immense time waster (and a waste of the Lord's bandwidth).

Praise Jesus, the Bible (KJV1611) is proven right once again.

[Nirvash]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion ^

I also suggest that you take a look here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_explosion

And do check the dictionary too... It wouldn't hurt.

So.. well done there, you smart "scientist" you.
You're really showing how smart and educated you truly are here...

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Friend, do you seriously think "cake" is a chemical compound?

He probably thinks that it's a made-up drug.

[Sauron]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Friend, do you seriously think "cake" is a chemical compound?

Here was my point: x



Here is where you are: x

Next time wear stilts so that the point doesn't go over your head.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

no water heats and turns into steam and it is still water just in another state. But exploding is when a chemical reaction takes compound(s) and turns it into another.

An explosion is a sudden increase in volume and release of energy in an extreme manner, usually with the generation of high temperatures and the release of gases.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion ^

I also suggest that you take a look here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_explosion

And do check the dictionary too... It wouldn't hurt.

So.. well done there, you smart "scientist" you.
You're really showing how smart and educated you truly are here...

[Nirvash]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Water doesn't burn, but it does explode when instantly heated to boiling point under confinement.
(Gunpowder doesn't explode unless confined either btw. It burns when not confined, explodes if otherwise.)
So there goes your nonsense right out the window. Water CAN explode!
But nobody has yet been able to blow up a human without adding chemicals, even though we've tried.
That should prove that we are, in fact - NOT made out of hydrogen or oxygen or such nonsense..

But we're actually created out of dust: It says so right there in the Bible.
Try reading it, cause you're coming off as quite uneducated here!



Friend, do you seriously think "cake" is a chemical compound?

no water heats and turns into steam and it is still water just in another state. But exploding is when a chemical reaction takes compound(s) and turns it into another.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Oddly enough, another very common entity on this planet is also made of the highly flammable hydrogen and oxygen: water. The last time I checked, it was neither exploding nor burning, and yet it has Hindenberg written all over it. In fact, it does the opposite of what it should(by your logic)---It extinguishes fires.

Water doesn't burn, but it does explode when instantly heated to boiling point under confinement.
(Gunpowder doesn't explode unless confined either btw. It burns when not confined, explodes if otherwise.)
So there goes your nonsense right out the window. Water CAN explode!
But nobody has yet been able to blow up a human without adding chemicals, even though we've tried.
That should prove that we are, in fact - NOT made out of hydrogen or oxygen or such nonsense..

But we're actually created out of dust: It says so right there in the Bible.
Try reading it, cause you're coming off as quite uneducated here!

Chemical changes can make something incredibly volatile become incredibly docile. However, since chemical change doesn't exist according to you, the beef I consume should make me sick from the E. Coli, and I should be eating raw eggs and sugar instead of a baked cake. Yet sadly, I'm not, because chemical change saved my life.

Friend, do you seriously think "cake" is a chemical compound?

[One-eyed Jack]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

With regard to the utility of science: Science is useful when it leads us closer to the Lord.

As Pastor Billy-Reuben ably explained, science tells us the net reproductive rate of bacteria, and a simple calculation leads us straight to the Biblical truth about the age of the Earth.

Obviously, if the numbers had come out differently -- if science said that net rate was not consistent with Biblical truth -- then science would be wrong.

The Word of God is Truth; science is like a signpost which points toward that Truth. Vandals or misinformed persons may turn the sign the wrong way, or paint over it, so that it seems to no longer point to the Bible -- but the Truth is still in the Bible and not in the sign.

~~ OEJ

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

the beef I consume should make me sick from the E. Coli,

You have E. coli in your intestines right now. Billions of them. You couldn't digest your food without E. coli.

Escherichia coli never made anyone sick, nor has any other microbe. There are only two things that cause disease, sin and lack of sin. God causes us to become sick to punish us for our sins or to test us. Of course, if you think you can prove otherwise, there is a lot of money waiting for you.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Sauron]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Hydrogen is more explosive than all of those elements, however.
Thus: If humans were made out of oxygen, hydrogen and carbon..
We'd be very prone to explode whenever fire is nearby. But are we? No.

Oddly enough, another very common entity on this planet is also made of the highly flammable hydrogen and oxygen: water. The last time I checked, it was neither exploding nor burning, and yet it has Hindenberg written all over it. In fact, it does the opposite of what it should(by your logic)---It extinguishes fires.

Chemical changes can make something incredibly volatile become incredibly docile. However, since chemical change doesn't exist according to you, the beef I consume should make me sick from the E. Coli, and I should be eating raw eggs and sugar instead of a baked cake. Yet sadly, I'm not, because chemical change saved my life.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Elements and atoms are two words that mean the same thing.

How could atoms truly be elements if you can create them?
And nobody has answered my questions yet..

Those are other elements. We are talking about CHEMICAL elements.

You are one confused shortbus-rider..
The only elements recongized by your falsely so-called-science religion are those "chemical" ones!

[Buford T Scoggins]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

What I want to know about is all of these man-made "elements", with liberal-bias names like Berkeley-ium, Californa-ium, and Europe-ium. How can they be elements if they are man-made?

What good is science if it doesn't produce anything useful?

I think it's time NASA starting earning its keep and invent Bush-ium. And when they get around to revisiting the moon, they should paint GWB's picture on it so that every time we look up, we can see our Great Leader.

YIC,
Buford

[Wibralover]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Stelletje BSO-kinderen there are 92 elments
4 elements did you actually go to school?
-> nice

[G-Baby]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

How so? There are only four elements.

Are you just that stupid or are you pretending?

Those are other elements. We are talking about CHEMICAL elements.

And there are 92 elements and 118 "composed".