[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Then where is the missing link between us and our common ancestor?

There are several, and you should be able to find out about them in any good museum. There was Australopithecus afarensis, Homo habilis and Homo erectus for example.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Then where is the missing link between us and our common ancestor?

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

[Saint Elmo]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

We'll see who is laughing last when you antitheists are burning in heck with the dinosaurs.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

1. scientist have found missing links between animals thats why the theroy exists charles darwin didnt just have the idea pop into his head scientist
found these fossils and created the theroy of evolution. here are some of ur missing links you were talking about.

http://www.livescience.com/11326-top-10-missing-links.html

2. well when the earth had all the right conditions you know water, atmosphere, oxygen just the right living conditions life was formed.

3. thats a hard one the main theroy is the big bang theroy. there are over theroys out there but the most likely therory is that one.
and besides you said something can not come from nothing but isnt that exactly what "god" did, created something from nothing.

Dear Retard:

Please show us where in "On the Origin of Species" Charles Darwin talked about his discoveries of fossils and that this is where he generated his theory of evilution.

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

I'm giving examples, and trying to simplify things for you. There are these things called ecological niches, and different creatures fit in different ones. It depends on the exact species you are talking about. Gorillas, for example, spend a reasonable amount of time on the ground as well as climbing.


Walking on two legs is one of the things that gives us the ability to make tools- the fact that we have two limbs that are not needed to walk means that they can be used for other things. You are right in the sense that humans aren't physically superior to all animals, the reason that we've done so well is because of our advanced intellect and ability to make tools and fire, and then later, machinery and so on.
If you are very pale then I would assume that your ancestors came from a part of the world where there was not a lot of sunlight. One theory is that it's because of their diet: http://scienceline.org/2007/06/ask-d...-inuiteskimos/ whilst others think that it might be due to the reflective effect of the ice an snow in the artic causing them to have higher exposure to the sun

Now Gorillas have HUGE freaking deltoids. Why do they have such huge deltoids if they walk on the ground compared to spider monkeys who spend their lives in trees?

Based on your earlier claims and how your story keeps changing, or "evolving" you know little about the theory you want to believe in. I suggest you first read a KJV 1611, then if you want to still rant about your little idea, you go read from the fathers of the concept every journal and publication written on it so that you can keep a consistent story with the lie they made up.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Now Gorillas have HUGE freaking deltoids. Why do they have such huge deltoids if they walk on the ground compared to spider monkeys who spend their lives in trees?

Based on your earlier claims and how your story keeps changing, or "evolving" you know little about the theory you want to believe in. I suggest you first read a KJV 1611, then if you want to still rant about your little idea, you go read from the fathers of the concept every journal and publication written on it so that you can keep a consistent story with the lie they made up.

Maybe because of how they walk, along with their dominance displays? I don't know, I'm not an expert on gorillas. I'm sure that if you're interested you could google it, or if not then I'd be happy to tell you lots of adaptations that birds have made.

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Maybe because of how they walk, along with their dominance displays? I don't know, I'm not an expert on gorillas. I'm sure that if you're interested you could google it, or if not then I'd be happy to tell you lots of adaptations that birds have made.

Changing your story won't help your cause at all. I am not going to google anything until you have read the KJV 1611 cover to cover. You came here, remember?

If you knew my secular training, you would know that I actually have a firm understanding of the "theory" you atheists think is true. I tolerated it so that I could get a profession where I can really do some good missionary work while making great money to pay tithing with.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Changing your story won't help your cause at all. I am not going to google anything until you have read the KJV 1611 cover to cover. You came here, remember?

If you knew my secular training, you would know that I actually have a firm understanding of the "theory" you atheists think is true. I tolerated it so that I could get a profession where I can really do some good missionary work while making great money to pay tithing with.

Ok sweet pea

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Ok sweet pea

Really you have no frame of reference. Read the KJV 1611. Then, I suggest once you have the proper perspective, to go out and read Mendel's work, Darwin's, and any other scientist. You obviously haven't. There are some interesting "theories" out there. While they are not the truth, I have a full understanding of them.

They do not talk of the wizardry of time travel like your version does, I can tell you that. They also don't hop species when they come up with a non-functioning example either. They label it "experimental error." Learn your stories before you share them, otherwise you just mess them up.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Really you have no frame of reference. Read the KJV 1611. Then, I suggest once you have the proper perspective, to go out and read Mendel's work, Darwin's, and any other scientist. You obviously haven't. There are some interesting "theories" out there. While they are not the truth, I have a full understanding of them.

They do not talk of the wizardry of time travel like your version does, I can tell you that. They also don't hop species when they come up with a non-functioning example either. They label it "experimental error." Learn your stories before you share them, otherwise you just mess them up.

I see what;s happened here. You saw my post about liking Doctor Who and assumed that I believe I time travel even though I explained that I had made a mistake afterwards and rectified it

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

I see what;s happened here. You saw my post about liking Doctor Who and assumed that I believe I time travel even though I explained that I had made a mistake afterwards and rectified it

Not only that, but according to your version of "natural selection" you said that if an organism underwent certain selective pressures that would cause it to change its environment, i.e. moving to trees, then said organism's ANCESTORS would grow new adaptations such as big deltoids. Which is really weird since gorillas have bigger deltoids than their tree dwelling neighbors even though they don't climb much.

What's funny is even if you switched ancestors for descendants you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Not only that, but according to your version of "natural selection" you said that if an organism underwent certain selective pressures that would cause it to change its environment, i.e. moving to trees, then said organism's ANCESTORS would grow new adaptations such as big deltoids. Which is really weird since gorillas have bigger deltoids than their tree dwelling neighbors even though they don't climb much.

What's funny is even if you switched ancestors for descendants you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

No I didn't..
Apart from the mistake between ancestors and descendants, but I corrected myself afterwards

[Saint Elmo]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

I ain't for sure what y'all talking bout but TIME TRAVEL IS AN OBOMINATION!

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

No I didn't..
Apart from the mistake between ancestors and descendants, but I corrected myself afterwards

Yes, you did. You are going to lie to us now? Really? There was discussion about needing to lift your arms to climb and everything. You tried to defend large deltoids being necessary to climbing.

And still, your version of evolution does not fit with Darwin's model nor modern "understanding" at all. I suggest after reading your Bible re-taking your Intro to Biology classes and paying attention this time.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

No I didn't..
Apart from the mistake between ancestors and descendants, but I corrected myself afterwards

As wait_what has pointed out, you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

Descendants do not, according to Darwinism, grow improvements because of their environment. Darwin said that the ones who had random mutations that enhanced their survival and their ability to reproduce outbred those who did not have those beneficial mutations.

In other words, giraffes didn't "grow longer necks" to reach tall trees. Giraffes with longer necks could reach tall trees, and survived to mate with other giraffes with long necks, which encouraged the trait of long-neckedness.

Granted, there's no evidence of short-necked giraffes, and God created them with long necks, but still . . . that's how Evilution is supposed to work.