[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

You have proven that you know nothing of the Bible in just a scant few hours. You call yourself a man of God....but God will smite you for twisting his words into a message of hate.

Ok, I'll bite. Show me exactly which verses I, or any other True Christian™ has "twisted into hate", and exactly how we've gone wrong.

This should be good.

[Father Septic Tank (On Moderation)]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Your Lord....and my best Friend Ever Jesus Christ.....want you to go to Luke chapter 6.....27-36....and read and understand that which you do not know.

While strolling along your little web site....which is demonic in nature...I have seen you people persecute anything and everything from fictional books, to a girl allowed to be raped over and over in a jail, you have persecuted David Copperfield and his trial hasn't even happened yet, you name it and you guys teach and preach hate.

You should LOVe the Muslims......because JESUS said to do so. Why....love thy enemy. That's why.

You judge other people....and that is the Lords job.

You are fast on your way to Team Hell. Enjoy.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Your Lord....and my best Friend Ever Jesus Christ.....want you to go to Luke chapter 6.....27-36....and read and understand that which you do not know.

While strolling along your little web site....which is demonic in nature...I have seen you people persecute anything and everything from fictional books, to a girl allowed to be raped over and over in a jail, you have persecuted David Copperfield and his trial hasn't even happened yet, you name it and you guys teach and preach hate.

You should LOVe the Muslims......because JESUS said to do so. Why....love thy enemy. That's why.

You judge other people....and that is the Lords job.

You are fast on your way to Team Hell. Enjoy.

I'm still waiting. Chapter and verse, please. You have made serious accusations here against God's favorite church. Back them up or apologize. Chapter and verse. Where have we gone wrong? Put up or shut up, God mocker.

[Father Septic Tank (On Moderation)]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

I'm still waiting. Chapter and verse, please. You have made serious accusations here against God's favorite church. Back them up or apologize. Chapter and verse. Where have we gone wrong? Put up or shut up, God mocker.

I put the chapter and verse in the post.....please learn to read.....I know it must be difficult for you.

I make a serious accusation because my Father demands that I call a kettle black when it is.

Twice today I have posted from Luke....the same exact stuff. Twice you have not read it. Don't make it three times or I shall think you are of Judas quality.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

YOU are the blasphemer. You will burn in hell for all eternity because you know only Satan and not God.

You have proven that you know nothing of the Bible in just a scant few hours. You call yourself a man of God....but God will smite you for twisting his words into a message of hate.

I put the chapter and verse in the post.....please learn to read.....I know it must be difficult for you.

I make a serious accusation because my Father demands that I call a kettle black when it is.

Twice today I have posted from Luke....the same exact stuff. Twice you have not read it. Don't make it three times or I shall think you are of Judas quality.

So you want to base your entire accusation on the verse in Luke (that you didn't even quote)? THAT proves that I "know nothing about the Holy Bible" and that I "have blasphemed" and that I "have twisted God's Words"? Is that the best you can do?

I had the entire KJV1611 Bible committed to memory by the time I was 7 years old. You're going to have to do better than that, God mocker.

[Father Septic Tank (On Moderation)]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

So you want to base your entire accusation on the verse in Luke (that you didn't even quote)? THAT proves that I "know nothing about the Holy Bible" and that I "have blasphemed" and that I "have twisted God's Words"? Is that the best you can do?

I had the entire KJV1611 Bible committed to memory by the time I was 7 years old. You're going to have to do better than that, God mocker.

Why Dark Lord Ezekial.....I have even seen today a post on this board about how...."niggras" eat to much watermelon.

And then YOU put up a PROVOCATIVE picture of a woman deep throating a banana and YOU said that was the Godly fruit and somethign to the effect of good christian women would it it. IT was rather suggestive.

Surely you are not of the Billy Swaggart ilk that will surely go to hell.

I think you are obviously a racist....and a terrible denegrator of women.

Obviously you have never been with a woman...because you are a hateful little boy.

And Jesus asked me to tell you to quit using as a symbol for him. HE said it was rather CATHOLIC of you since he GOT OFF the cross.

You must like the smell of sulfur in the morning.

[Father Septic Tank (On Moderation)]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

So you want to base your entire accusation on the verse in Luke (that you didn't even quote)? THAT proves that I "know nothing about the Holy Bible" and that I "have blasphemed" and that I "have twisted God's Words"? Is that the best you can do?

I had the entire KJV1611 Bible committed to memory by the time I was 7 years old. You're going to have to do better than that, God mocker.

If find it odd that you commited the entire book to memory and YET you want ME to quote Luke 6:27-36 for YOU.

WHY would I do that? I have posted it on this forum TODAY.

Three times Judas I have told you that which you DO NOT know about Jesus.

You anger Jesus because you try to tell a message of hate......int he guise of HIS divine word.....you are a goat. Goats go to hell.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

And then YOU put up a PROVOCATIVE picture of a woman deep throating a banana and YOU said that was the Godly fruit and somethign to the effect of good christian women would it it. IT was rather suggestive.

Only for someone like you..
Who's mind is in the gutter and can't watch a woman (or a man for that matter) simply EATING a banana without getting thoughts of a sexual nature!
You sick freak of a mocker! You most surely make baby Jesus puke with your depraved, sex-crazed behaviour.

Banana's are Godly and pictures of them do much to advance Christ cause, simply because they prove intelligent design!
As for Luke 6:27-36 why don't you tell us, in detail, what of it you think the good Pastor violates, and how.

PS.
If you really were a Christian as you claim to be.. then wouldn't you most surely obey Matthew 23:9???
I think someone needs to read their Bible a bit..

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Judge not lest yea be judged yourself....

Septic, "Judge not, that ye be not judged" clearly only applies to fellow Baptists, and not to idol worshippers like yourself:

Read the entire quote in Matthew 7:1-5: Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

If the whole text of Matthew 7 doesn't convince you, check out 1 Corinthians 15:14: Them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

If you know how I can judge them that are without God without judging at all, well, I'm all ears. BTW, I'm perfectly willing to be judged by the judgement with which I judge others. I'm not saying I'm totally without sin, but I do lead an awfully Godly life. Not a lot of beams in mine eyes.

There is NO evidence to support a claim that a great flood killed the dinosaurs. There is also NO evidence that man and dinosaur walked on the planet at the same time. There is also NO evidence that man came from monkey.

You really need to pick a side in this debate. Half of the truth (that man did not descend from monkeys) won't save your sorry ass from eternal hellfire if you don't believe the rest of the Bible.

...meanwhile 6 pound 8 ounce baby Jesus cries while man further corrupts His fine work.

Jesus is not a baby. He is an adult, living in Heaven, and has been for nearly 2,000 years. This is not an especially difficult concept to grasp. Only Cathlickers and sissies who were weaned too early (you probably qualify as both) believe that "baby Jesus" cries, or does anything, that "adult Jesus" doesn't.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Septic, "Judge not, that ye be not judged" clearly only applies to fellow Baptists, and not to idol worshippers like yourself:

Read the entire quote in Matthew 7:1-5: Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

If the whole text of Matthew 7 doesn't convince you, check out 1 Corinthians 15:14: Them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

If you know how I can judge them that are without God without judging at all, well, I'm all ears. BTW, I'm perfectly willing to be judged by the judgement with which I judge others. I'm not saying I'm totally without sin, but I do lead an awfully Godly life. Not a lot of beams in mine eyes.

You really need to pick a side in this debate. Half of the truth (that man did not descend from monkeys) won't save your sorry ass from eternal hellfire if you don't believe the rest of the Bible.

Jesus is not a baby. He is an adult, living in Heaven, and has been for nearly 2,000 years. This is not an especially difficult concept to grasp. Only Cathlickers and sissies who were weaned too early (you probably qualify as both) believe that "baby Jesus" cries, or does anything, that "adult Jesus" doesn't.

That shut the heretic up nicely. Good job. Pity he can't find it in himself to apologise and repent, though.

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

That shut the heretic up nicely. Good job. Pity he can't find it in himself to apologise and repent, though.

I'm certain that the Holy Ghost is working on his heart as we speak. I'm praying for that right now.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Faith+1 (On Moderation)]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

what made you think dinosaurs existed? the giant skeletons? and that yeah, the carbon on dinosaur fossils indicates ANCIENT life, millions of years before man.

[JudasReborn]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Hold on, lemme just go into the Cloud Lounge and ask
Jesus about it.

...

Jesus says:

Dinosaurs? Oh, yes, funny creatures them Dino's.
But they didn't prove wortyhy of intelligence so God
decided to kill them. Quite original of him, to use
a big asteroid.

Note: Translated from HolySpeak to English.

[Ed Gein (On Moderation)]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Spectacular Mummified Dinosaur Found in North Dakota

Monday, December 03, 2007

• E-Mail
• Print
• Digg This!
• del.icio.us

AP/National Geographic Society

The scales of the fossilized hadrosaur, clearly visible in a rock formation in North Dakota.
The scales of the fossilized hadrosaur, clearly visible in a rock formation in North Dakota.

• 
• 
• 
• 

WASHINGTON — One of the most complete dinosaur mummies ever found is revealing secrets locked away for millions of years, bringing researchers as close as they will ever get to touching a live dino.
The fossilized duckbilled hadrosaur is so well preserved that scientists have been able to calculate its muscle mass and learn that it was more muscular than thought, probably giving it the ability to outrun predators such as Tyrannosaurus rex.
While they call it a mummy, the dinosaur is not really preserved as King Tut was. The dinosaur body has been fossilized into stone.
Unlike the collections of bones found in museums, this hadrosaur came complete with skin, ligaments, tendons and possibly some internal organs, according to researchers.
• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Evolution & Paleontology Center.
The study is not yet complete, but scientists have concluded that hadrosaurs were bigger — 3½ tons and up to 40 feet long — and stronger than had been known, were quick and flexible and had skin with scales that may have been striped.
Related

• Stories
  
  • 70-Million-Year-Old Sea-Serpent Fossil For Sale
  • Huge Dinosaur Graveyard Found in Spain
  • Fossilized Food Chain Found in German Museum
  • New Dinosaur Found in Basement of British Museum
  • Dinosaur Found With 'Vacuum-Cleaner' Mouth

"Oh, the skin is wonderful," paleontologist Phillip Manning of Manchester University in England rhapsodized, admitting to a "glazed look in my eye."
"It's unbelievable when you look at it for the first time," he said in a telephone interview. "There is depth and structure to the skin. The level of detail expressed in the skin is just breathtaking."
Manning said there is a pattern of banding to the larger and smaller scales on the skin. Because it has been fossilized researchers do not know the skin color. Looking at it in monochrome shows a striped pattern.
He notes that in modern reptiles, such a pattern is often associated with color change.
The fossil was found in 1999 in North Dakota and now is nicknamed "Dakota." It is being analyzed in the world's largest CT scanner, operated by the Boeing Co. The machine usually is used for space shuttle engines and other large objects.
Researchers hope the technology will help them learn more about the fossilized insides of the creature.
"It's a definite case of watch this space," Manning said. "We are trying to be very conservative, very careful."
But they have learned enough so far to produce two books and a television program. The TV special, "Dino Autopsy," will air on the National Geographic channel Dec. 9. National Geographic Society partly funded the research.
A children's book, "DinoMummy: The Life, Death, and Discovery of Dakota, a Dinosaur From Hell Creek," goes on sale Tuesday and an adult book, "Grave Secrets of Dinosaurs: Soft Tissues and Hard Science," will be available in January.
Soft parts of dead animals normally decompose rapidly after death. Because of chemical conditions where this animal died, fossilization — replacement of tissues by minerals — took place faster than the decomposition, leaving mineralized portions of the tissue.
That does not mean DNA, the building blocks of life, can be recovered, Manning said. Some has been recovered from frozen mammoths up to 1 million years old, he said.
At the age of this dinosaur, 65 million to 67 million years old, "the chance of finding DNA is remote," he said.
A Manchester colleague, Roy Wogelius, who also worked on the dinosaur, said "one thing that we are very confident of is that we do have some organic molecular breakdown products present."
That look at chemicals associated with the animal is still research in progress.
Matthew Carrano, a paleontologist at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, said he could not comment in detail about the find because he had not seen the research.
But, he added, "Any time we can get a glimpse of the soft anatomy of a dinosaur, that's significant."
The findings from Dakota may cause museums to rethink their dinosaur displays.
Most dinosaur skeletons in museums, for example, show the vertebrae right next to one another. The researchers looking at Dakota found a gap of about a centimeter — about 0.4 inch — between each one.
That indicates there may have been a disk or other material between them, allowing more flexibility and meaning the animal was actually longer than what is shown in a museum. On large animals, adding the space could make them a yard longer or more, Manning said.
Because ligaments and tendons were preserved, as well as other parts of Dakota, researchers could to calculate its muscle mass, showing it was stronger and potentially faster than had been known.
They estimated the hadrosaur's top speed at about 28 miles per hour, 10 mph faster than the giant T. Rex is thought to have been able to run.
"It's very logical, though, that a hadrosaur could run faster than a T. rex. It's a major prey animal and it doesn't have big horns on its head like triceratops. Hadrosaurs didn't have much in the way of defense systems, so they probably relied on fleet of foot," Manning said.
Dakota was discovered by Tyler Lyson, then a teenager who liked hunting for fossils on his family ranch.
Lyson, who is currently working on his doctorate degree in paleontology at Yale University, founded the Marmarth Research Foundation, an organization dedicated to the excavation, preservation and study of dinosaurs.









that photograph...what is photoshopped? the ruler, or the soft anatomy on the bones?

[Nobar King]

Re: Scientists Prove Dinasours Existed Millions of Years Ago!

Hmm... What did I see? Some dried and cracked mud?