[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Gravity

Also, if you've taken an introductory physics course, you'd know that the electrical force is several orders of magnitude larger than the electrical force.

I see you took an introductory physics course and failed an introductory English composition course.

Would you like to try this one again, Great and Powerful Wikipedia Scholar?

[Steve]

Re: Gravity

You guys are really missing my point. Want to destroy Africa? The gays? Gravitons will help you.

Huh? I'm pretty sure the African gays are destroying themselves with the AIDS all by themselves. We're pretty much observers on that one.

[revcocoa]

Re: Gravity

You guys are really missing my point. Want to destroy Africa? The gays? Gravitons will help you.

[Jedediah]

Re: Gravity

Basically, gravitons require too much energy and are too weak to observe.

We accept your surrender.

Have you considered that a personal relationship with Jesus Christ may provide you with the fulfillment you are not receiving from secular "science", so falsely called (I Timothy 6:20-21)? Wouldn't you like to be right about everything all the time, for once? Not to mention, you get to join us in Heaven instead of thrashing about in torments in the lake of fire for all eternity...

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Gravity

That's a pretty long post to say your toys aren't big enough to find something that doesn't exist.

Is that what she was saying? I thought her cat had run across the keyboard.

[Steve]

Re: Gravity

Actually there's a few reasons we haven't. For one, the gravitational energy scale constructed with dimensional analysis using the relevant physical constants

• G, the gravitational constant: 6.67*10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
• c, the speed of light: 3*10^8 m/s
• h, Planck's constant: 6.626*10^-34 J*s

is m ~ Sqrt[G/hc] ~ 1.2*10^19 GeV. This is enormous. At CERN today we only have a few GeV to play with. (See Aitchison and Hey, Gauge Theories in Particle Physics)



Also, if you've taken an introductory physics course, you'd know that the electrical force is several orders of magnitude larger than the electrical force.


Furthermore, one can show that the best detector of gravitons would be the size of Jupiter. No bigger, no smaller. If it operated at 100% efficiency, it would detect 1 every 10 years. (See T. Rothman and S. Boughn, Found. Phys. 36, 1801 (2006),
arXiv:gr-qc/0601043v)


Basically, gravitons require too much energy and are too weak to observe.

That's a pretty long post to say your toys aren't big enough to find something that doesn't exist.

And this:

Also, if you've taken an introductory physics course, you'd know that the electrical force is several orders of magnitude larger than the electrical force.

Please stop posting while smoking acid.

[revcocoa]

Re: Gravity

If gravity acts as you say it does, why have the particle phycisists not discovered their "graviton"?

Actually there's a few reasons we haven't. For one, the gravitational energy scale constructed with dimensional analysis using the relevant physical constants

• G, the gravitational constant: 6.67*10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
• c, the speed of light: 3*10^8 m/s
• h, Planck's constant: 6.626*10^-34 J*s

is m ~ Sqrt[G/hc] ~ 1.2*10^19 GeV. This is enormous. At CERN today we only have a few GeV to play with. (See Aitchison and Hey, Gauge Theories in Particle Physics)



Also, if you've taken an introductory physics course, you'd know that the electrical force is several orders of magnitude larger than the electrical force.


Furthermore, one can show that the best detector of gravitons would be the size of Jupiter. No bigger, no smaller. If it operated at 100% efficiency, it would detect 1 every 10 years. (See T. Rothman and S. Boughn, Found. Phys. 36, 1801 (2006),
arXiv:gr-qc/0601043v)


Basically, gravitons require too much energy and are too weak to observe.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Gravity

Is it possible scientists have simply spelled the word wrong?

Shouldn't it be "grabbity"? Because it grabs things and pulls them together?

[James Hutchins]

Re: Gravity

If gravity acts as you say it does, why have the particle phycisists not discovered their "graviton"?

Mrs. Hutchins is a particle duster. She uses Pledge(r) and a old pair of my skivvies. She says the dust gavitates to everything. I just wish she stop talking and get back to work.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Gravity

allow me to dissagree with you. Gravity does exists and is the reason the moon doesn't fall to earth, and the earth doesn't fall to the sun which without gravity would never exist.

If gravity acts as you say it does, why have the particle phycisists not discovered their "graviton"?

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Gravity

you may be right to all of the above but then how fusion is happening? (the nuclear reaction that makes the sun shine and requires a strong gravity force to happen) maybe after as you say God is pulling us down and laws of gravity is the ways he does it

Here we see the knots secularists tie themselves in while trying to reconcile science's lies with Biblical reality.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Gravity

I have never heard anyone talk of the burning of coal as 'fusion'. It must be a linguistical thing.

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

Friend, the Moon stays where it is and the Sun stays where it is because God is holding them there for us. They are neither moving closer nor further way of any significant amount. No one can hold an object of that size completely steady while tending to all the little matters on the Earth at the same time.

No doubt, one day someone will commit a heinous act and God will throw the Sun at them in a fit of rage.

Now, if you want to call Gods pitching arm 'Gravity', then that is your choice, You will be completely wrong though. However, with the Sun crashing into the Earth, I do not think that will matter much.

God gave you the generous gift of 'Free Will' to enable you to be completely wrong. I am glad to see you making use of it. I hope you thank God for your mistakes.

you may be right to all of the above but then how fusion is happening? (the nuclear reaction that makes the sun shine and requires a strong gravity force to happen) maybe after as you say God is pulling us down and laws of gravity is the ways he does it

[James Hutchins]

Re: Gravity

allow me to dissagree with you. Gravity does exists and is the reason the moon doesn't fall to earth, and the earth doesn't fall to the sun which without gravity would never exist.

Friend, the Moon stays where it is and the Sun stays where it is because God is holding them there for us. They are neither moving closer nor further way of any significant amount. No one can hold an object of that size completely steady while tending to all the little matters on the Earth at the same time.

No doubt, one day someone will commit a heinous act and God will throw the Sun at them in a fit of rage.

Now, if you want to call Gods pitching arm 'Gravity', then that is your choice, You will be completely wrong though. However, with the Sun crashing into the Earth, I do not think that will matter much.

God gave you the generous gift of 'Free Will' to enable you to be completely wrong. I am glad to see you making use of it. I hope you thank God for your mistakes.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Gravity

allow me to dissagree with you. Gravity does exists and is the reason the moon doesn't fall to earth, and the earth doesn't fall to the sun which without gravity would never exist.

So... the moon doesn't fall to the earth because gravity keeps it away? And the sun exists... because gravity does?

Friend, I think you need to put down your weed pipe, throw away your lighters, and walk outside into the fresh air.