X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    you don't need tools to make astronomical observations. Mayans made a perfect calendar just by looking the stars at night
    Interesting. So, while traveling to England, you think he looked at stars with his naked eye from the back of his horse, and said, "Hey, that star over there is more than 1.4 times the mass of the sun, and that's why it exploded"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    you don't need tools to make astronomical observations. Mayans made a perfect calendar just by looking the stars at night
    They didn't measure the mass of stars that way. The magnitude of a star does not tell you its size, its distance, or much of anything except how bright it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • KarasuFarishe
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    How did he observe the way they function while traveling to England?
    you don't need tools to make astronomical observations. Mayans made a perfect calendar just by looking the stars at night

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    by the way they function
    How did he observe the way they function while traveling to England?

    Leave a comment:


  • KarasuFarishe
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by Didymus Much View Post
    I thought I politely asked you to stop hurting my brain with your extremely poor understanding of gravity (and science in general)?

    If the center of a star had an INFINITE gravitational field, then every particle would have infinite weight.

    Let's take the example of a particle one atomic radius from the center of a star. That means that 50.0000000...0000001% of the mass of the star is pulling it towards the center, and 49.99999999...999999% (the rest of star further away from the center yet still on the same side of the center as the particle) is pulling it away from the center. As these forces would very nearly counteract each other, they in essence cancel each other out, and the particle weighs next to nothing.

    Stay in school.
    the area that has infinite mass is so small that it is insignificant.
    also i have a bachelor in Chemistry and i work in the state laboratory of turkey

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    i said the center of a star has INFINITE gravitational field...
    I thought I politely asked you to stop hurting my brain with your extremely poor understanding of gravity (and science in general)?

    If the center of a star had an INFINITE gravitational field, then every particle would have infinite weight.

    Let's take the example of a particle one atomic radius from the center of a star. That means that 50.0000000...0000001% of the mass of the star is pulling it towards the center, and 49.99999999...999999% (the rest of star further away from the center yet still on the same side of the center as the particle) is pulling it away from the center. As these forces would very nearly counteract each other, they in essence cancel each other out, and the particle weighs next to nothing.

    Stay in school.

    Leave a comment:


  • KarasuFarishe
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    Yes, you did. It was Ms. Mitza who said that the cosmologists say there is no gravity in the center. We will have to ask her for a reference.


    HOW? How did he observe that stars greater than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun tend to explode, as he was traveling to England?

    Did he look at them through a telescope through the sunroof of his car?
    by the way they function

    Leave a comment:


  • Jack O'fagan
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    there is no up down left or right in space so everything hovers on it
    (i thought float and hover mean the same thing)
    .
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • KarasuFarishe
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by Zechariah Smyth View Post
    Tell you what, Buck Rogers: go to a regular astrophysics forum and tell them the Sun is "floating" in space, OK?



    Yours in Christ,

    Z. Smyth
    there is no up down left or right in space so everything hovers on it
    (i thought float and hover mean the same thing)

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    i said the center of a star has INFINITE gravitational field
    because a factor that determines gravity is mass/radius so if radius=0 in the case of the center of the sun that means mass( and therefore gravity) is infinite but as we are getting further from the center the radius increaces and gravity decreases
    Yes, you did. It was Ms. Mitza who said that the cosmologists say there is no gravity in the center. We will have to ask her for a reference.

    he discovered it by observation
    HOW? How did he observe that stars greater than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun tend to explode, as he was traveling to England?

    Did he look at them through a telescope through the sunroof of his car?

    Leave a comment:


  • KarasuFarishe
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    There is nothing on that page about how the center of a star has no gravitational field.

    Nothing.

    This part was a bit confusing, though:



    How did he discover it on his way to England? Did someone drop it by the side of the road? Did he notice it caught between the seat cushions on the train?

    Was that page written by a child?
    i said the center of a star has INFINITE gravitational field
    because a factor that determines gravity is mass/radius so if radius=0 in the case of the center of the sun that means mass( and therefore gravity) is infinite but as we are getting further from the center the radius increaces and gravity decreases

    he discovered it by observation

    here's another video

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    There is nothing on that page about how the center of a star has no gravitational field.

    Nothing.

    This part was a bit confusing, though:

    Stars greater than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun (called the Chandrasekhar limit after the Indian physicist who discovered it on his way to England) will tend to explode in a supernova casting off much of their mass.
    How did he discover it on his way to England? Did someone drop it by the side of the road? Did he notice it caught between the seat cushions on the train?

    Was that page written by a child?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zechariah Smyth
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Tell you what, Buck Rogers: go to a regular astrophysics forum and tell them the Sun is "floating" in space, OK?



    Yours in Christ,

    Z. Smyth

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by KarasuFarishe View Post
    earth is bound to sun which is floating on the empty space(space has no gravity so everything floats)...
    Ow, please stop, you're making my brain hurt.

    Leave a comment:


  • KarasuFarishe
    replied
    Re: Gravity

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    You haven't got the slightest clue what you are on about, have you. Stop making stuff up to sound clever because you assume we know nothing of physics and its false teachings.

    It's clear you are a person unused to having the imaginary twaddle in your brain challenged. Out here we deal with evidence, not what you would like to be true.
    for the fusion:

    and for the gravity:

    Leave a comment:

Working...