[ozewozzie]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

What sort of gobbledygook is this supposed to be? We speak God's Favorite Language, American, on this board, boy.

How is that his favourite language, (btw isnt this language usually called "English"?)
I would put my bet on chinese being his favourite language, as that's the most spoken language on the world..

(caused by lack of using condoms)

[James Hutchins]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

Tuurlijk wel, condooms zorgen toch dat je niet zwanger wordt gekkie!

Translation: "Comdoms prevent you from getting pregnant."

Not 'doing it' also prevents it and the AIDS too!

[James Hutchins]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

How is that his favourite language, (btw isnt this language usually called "English"?)
I would put my bet on chinese being his favourite language, as that's the most spoken language on the world..

(caused by lack of using condoms)

American is God's Favorite Language(c)

English is barely decipherable. Those toothless brits are only a vowel away from the crappola of the drunken scots.

Gook grunts is not Gods Favorite Language(c) as the slants hate God.

Finally, betting is fowned on except at Casino night when part of the take goes to the Church.

[ozewozzie]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

Lol i guess the bible forgot to mention this about the "american" language;
Hmm.. quite a disappointment, as America apparently is the only nation which has 'godly area', according to this post

[Anomalyah]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

Hahaha, okay, erm, old dude?
I hope you DO realise condoms have been around for a very long time? Not since the 50s, but also long before that?
Condoms have been used for at least 400 years. Since the 19th century, they have been one of the most popular methods of contraception in the world.
See how they say 'most popular'. It was a very popular form of contraception WAY before your birthdate.
They have been used in ancient times, made of intestines, for instant.
Since about 1855, rubber condoms have been used, latex ones have been around since 1920, so both of these were before the 1950s.

• Unless you have a very small tallywhacker, condoms usually break during sex.

I giggled at the word 'tallywhacker'. Condoms come in different sizes, from oversized to snug and they also come in a variety of surfaces intended to stimulate the user's partner. Condoms are usually supplied with a lubricant. coating to facilitate penetration

• Condoms have small pores allowing the man's seed to pass trough.

As condoms are made of latex and rubber, they CANNOT have pores/holes big anough to let those cute li'l swimmers out.

• Condoms are transparent allowing the man's seed to see the most optimal route through the woman's naughty parts.

Hahaha, you're actually implying spermcells have eyes. I giggled again.
Sperm cells don't have organs, only tiny things cells have, like mitochrondria etc. The do not have any kind of sense, they just swim before they die.

• Condoms have legal disclaimers stating they do not prevent pregnancy.

Of course! If you misuse them, and/or when they break, then you're screwed. Literally.

• The more times a condom is used, the more seed will be collected in the condom thereby increasing the chance of a pregnancy.

Condoms are meant for one-time-use. After that, you throw them away. It's practically impossible to use it multiple times, because you'd be unable to get it on your 'tallywhacker' correctly.


I know what's going to happen. You are going to call me a whore, a slut, but really, not a single fuck was given. I learned all of this in high school, I learned it reading books, I learned it by experience.
And really, my boyfriend was far from innocent.
He bought the condoms.
He made me spread my legs.
And, God, sex feels SO good.


Also, you say that only young people get STD's, and HIV (Use your terms correctly, please. When having unprotected sex with an HIV-positive person, you get infected with HIV. AIDS is a disease that may come LONG after that. Either way, you're screwed.)
Old people get STD's too, as they are often engaging in sex nowadays, and haven't been informated by all the diseases and contraceptions.

I hope I ranted in a correct way, but as English is not my first language, I sometimes make mistakes.
Forgive me for that.

God bless you all.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

I hope you DO realise condoms have been around for a very long time? Not since the 50s, but also long before that?

If you would have bothered to actually read my posting before you responded you would have seen I said "became popular in the 50s". I never said they didn't exist before the 50s.

Hahaha, you're actually implying spermcells have eyes.

Of course they do, how else would they determine where to go!

Old people get STD's too, as they are often engaging in sex nowadays, and haven't been informated by all the diseases and contraceptions.

Yes, but older people are less likely to attract AIDS as they use less condoms.

[clownbaby]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

You read the statistics wrong. It's not okay, you should learn to use your brain and stop making stupid mistakes. Read my original posting in regards to why you are wrong. Don't forget to actually read the text, look thoroughly at the graphs and to click on all hyperlinks and read the referred pages as well. If those pages also contain hyperlinks, repeat doing this until you have read all related and unrelated pages. I an certain that doing this will convince you that God is right and that you are wrong.

Lol, I suppose I'll explain it again

In your Figure 1. The graphs shows HIV prevalence vs condom use. Notice that if the percentage use of condoms is low, we have a large amount of HIV cases present. This is expected, since using condoms only, say 5% percent of the time would leave you with 95% of your sexual encounters without condoms thus increasing your risks of contracting HIV and other STDs. Now, they only show up to 35% condom use. To support your hypothesis, you would have to examine what is happening when condoms are used more often say in the 85-100% range. If there were many HIV cases here, then your hypothesis would have some evidence and more investigation would be required, however, this is not the case.

You're welcome

[Marshall]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

AIDS is for homos. No one cares if they use condoms or not because they are disgusting and are going to hell anyway. AIDS rates are high because of them. Take out the gay AIDSers and the number is primarily atheist slut welfare leeches and minority scum.
Big shock.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

I suppose I'll explain it again

It's time for you to stop "explaining" and to start listening. This will prevent you from looking like a complete retard.

If you open your eyes and look at the first graph you will notice that at the bottom it mentions the amount of condom usage (0% - 35%) and on the left it mentions how many people got AIDS. Since the line is going up every idiot, with you as exception apparently, can see that the higher the use of condoms is, the more people get AIDS. You can also see that those who do not use condoms at all, also never get AIDS. I fail to see how someone can be too stupid to understand this.

Being an idiot is not an excuse:

• 1st Samuel 21:15 "Have I need of mad men, that ye have brought this fellow to play the mad man in my presence? shall this fellow come into my house?"
• Romans 1:21 "Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened."
• Matthew 5:22 "But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."
• Psalm 14:1 "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."

[clownbaby]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

It's time for you to stop "explaining" and to start listening. This will prevent you from looking like a complete retard.

If you open your eyes and look at the first graph you will notice that at the bottom it mentions the amount of condom usage (0% - 35%) and on the left it mentions how many people got AIDS. Since the line is going up every idiot, with you as exception apparently, can see that the higher the use of condoms is, the more people get AIDS. You can also see that those who do not use condoms at all, also never get AIDS. I fail to see how someone can be too stupid to understand this.

Being an idiot is not an excuse:

• 1st Samuel 21:15 "Have I need of mad men, that ye have brought this fellow to play the mad man in my presence? shall this fellow come into my house?"
• Romans 1:21 "Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened."
• Matthew 5:22 "But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."
• Psalm 14:1 "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."

Again, you are wrong. Also, please stop calling me retarded because you have no idea what you are talking about. We don't know what the relationship is for higher condom use. Just because they use a linear regression model does not mean that the relationship is linear for all % of condom use!!! It is possible that the relationship is quadratic, quartic, or exponential. You need to look at more data in order to decide what the relationship is.

It is true, that for low % condom use there is higher prevalence of HIV.

I'm betting this will get me another infraction amirite?

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

Again, you are wrong. Also, please stop calling me retarded because you have no idea what you are talking about. We don't know what the relationship is for higher condom use. Just because they use a linear regression model does not mean that the relationship is linear for all % of condom use!!! It is possible that the relationship is quadratic, quartic, or exponential. You need to look at more data in order to decide what the relationship is.

It is true, that for low % condom use there is higher prevalence of HIV.

I'm betting this will get me another infraction amirite?

Friend, just accept you are wrong. You are just embarrassing yourself.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

We don't know what the relationship is for higher condom use. Just because they use a linear regression model does not mean that the relationship is linear for all % of condom use!!! It is possible that the relationship is quadratic, quartic, or exponential. You need to look at more data in order to decide what the relationship is.

You are indeed retarded. Unlike what you say here we know exactly what the relationship is. It's linear! How we know this? Because the line is straight! But you probably never paid attention at school because you were masturbating all the time, so you missed the part where you could have learned that a straight line means a linear relationship.

So it's actually quite simple. 0% condom usage, 0% chance of AIDS. 100% condom usage, 100% chance of AIDS. Only a retard would not understand this.

[Lisa H]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

Again, you are wrong. Also, please stop calling me retarded because you have no idea what you are talking about. We don't know what the relationship is for higher condom use. Just because they use a linear regression model does not mean that the relationship is linear for all % of condom use!!! It is possible that the relationship is quadratic, quartic, or exponential. You need to look at more data in order to decide what the relationship is.

It is true, that for low % condom use there is higher prevalence of HIV.

I'm betting this will get me another infraction amirite?

Try listening to Surgeon Sage, I think he sums it pretty well.

[clownbaby]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

You are indeed retarded. Unlike what you say here we know exactly what the relationship is. It's linear! How we know this? Because the line is straight! But you probably never paid attention at school because you were masturbating all the time, so you missed the part where you could have learned that a straight line means a linear relationship.

So it's actually quite simple. 0% condom usage, 0% chance of AIDS. 100% condom usage, 100% chance of AIDS. Only a retard would not understand this.

Yeah, you should take a course on statistics. All you know from the graph is that the relationship is quasi-linear (it's not fully linear, they really shouldn't have used a linear regression model here as it is terribly skewed).

It just sad that naive people like you look at a partial set of data and assume that the relationship holds for larger quantities of condoms used

I don't disagree with the relationship being linear (or almost linear) for low condom use but it is absurd to think it holds for high condom use WITHOUT HAVING ALL OF THE DATA.

I think you might be full-on retarded if you disagree with this. I've shown this thread to a bunch of people and they all think you need to stop hitting the pipe. Serious lol.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Scientific PROOF that CONDOMS CAUSE AIDS and pregnancy!

Yeah, you should take a course on statistics.

How dare you. COM is a very wise man, who's earned his knowledge through the long years the Lord has allowed him to live on this earth. He does not need to go to some liberal brainwash factory to learn the truth!