I guess what I'm saying is that according to the logic behind the original argument, we should be drowning in floods of piss right now.
And yet, clearly we're not. Obviously you don't really understand. If you'd like to read the thread before embarrassing yourself further, you would learn the correct answer to your questions.
Re: Homeschool Science Lessons: Proving atheists wrong with science
What I don't understand is, if we drink 2 litres of water per day, where does all the urine go? Apparently, around 1.8 litres per day is normal for your average Jo, so where is it all? Obviously for the last few hundred years we've been pumping it into the sea via sewers but what happens to it then? Because those 6 billion people have, over the last 6000 years, produced 23652000000000000 litres of urine and that means that the sea must be almost pure urine! And that's before you even start to ask where the animal urine goes, there's more of them than there is of us and they all gotta go!
I guess what I'm saying is that according to the logic behind the original argument, we should be drowning in floods of piss right now.
if we are only talking about when life began, which is believed to be roughly 3.5 billion years ago, it started with single-celled organisms comprised mostly of water
Where is the Scriptural support for any of this nonsense? I you're going to cite "facts," you need to substantiate them with some proof. Therefore, kindly refer to the relevant chapter and verse of the Holy Bible that supports each of your assertions. Otherwise, they will be assumed to be false.
How much faith must be required to believe that single-celled organism comprised mostly of water floomphed into existence from whatever was pre-existing, Mr Alex? Even according to the evolutionists, before that microbe all there was rock.
Wait.. no, not yet.. (are we looking at the right rock?).. any minute now.. any second.. any microsecond..
counting down in nanoseconds
,,,,,,,seven .,,,,,,six ..,,,,,five ...,,,,four ....,,,three .....,,two nanoseconds to go ......,one nanosecond
......FLOOMPH......
And the evidence? NONE! It's just what they believe (this week). I don't have that much faith; first it's necessary to disregard God(who actually was there)'s log of historical events; secondly, to accept a contradictory fable on the say-so of charlatans who brought us such wonders as heroin addiction, AIDS and The Titanic..
Re: Homeschool Science Lessons: Proving atheists wrong with science
Originally posted by JustThe(satanic)FactsPleaseView Post
I have several things to say about this. Forgive me if I repeat past commenters, I didn't read all the comments. (I did read enough to see a whole lot of un-Christian behavior out of some so-called Christians. (Really, Reverend? You think God is OK with you calling people "retard"?) 1)Nobody in the secular world purports that there have been 7 billion people on this planet since it formed 4.54 billion years ago. Even if we are only talking about when life began, which is believed to be roughly 3.5 billion years ago, it started with single-celled organisms comprised mostly of water. 2)Human beings aren't the only creatures on the planet that drink water. 3)When you drink water, it doesn't just disappear. Some is absorbed by the body, some is eliminated as waste, some is excreted through your pores as sweat (fun fact: you are sweating right now, even if you don't realize it. It is occurring so slowly and at such a low rate your body heat causes it to evaporate), the rest is returned to the Earth when your body decomposes after death. 4)You cannot use science to prove atheists wrong. Atheists are atheists because of science. What we have here is a poorly thought-out idea. One which must have sounded great to whoever thought it up, but any critical-thinker, be they Creationist, Atheist, Nontheist, Jewish, or whatever, should be able to see the major flaws in this argument. Forgive the pun, but it just doesn't hold water. I hope any reply I get to this isn't hostile. I'm not trying to discredit Creationism as a whole here, I'm just saying that this particular factoid is not usable as an argument for a 6000-year-old planet as opposed to a 4.54 billion-year-old planet. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Where is the Scriptural support for any of this nonsense? I you're going to cite "facts," you need to substantiate them with some proof. Therefore, kindly refer to the relevant chapter and verse of the Holy Bible that supports each of your assertions. Otherwise, they will be assumed to be false.
Re: Homeschool Science Lessons: Proving atheists wrong with scien
Originally posted by JustThe(satanic)FactsPleaseView Post
Truly, these are the words of a Godly man. One who loves and respects ALL of his fellow men as The Lord God commands us to.
Was some of the water you drink today once piss in the bladder of a Brontosarus or K Rex? Isn't that what Jesus hating atheists and false luke warm Christians believe?
Really? Calling somebody "retard"? And you're supposed to be a reverend. Calling people names only makes people lose respect for you.
Jesus called His enemies vipers and hypocrites. Does that make people have less respect for Him?
Use of the word "retard" as an insult makes you look like you stopped you social development in 3rd grade.
It's not meant as an insult; it's a mere statement of a fact of life.
It also is highly offensive to those God created with disadvantages in life. They are still God's children, and He loves them just as much as He loves you,
Wrong. God hates plenty of people (e.g. Psalms 10:3).
and just as much as He loves the person you just insulted.
We don't insult people; we just have the courage to call things what they are.
Truly, these are the words of a Godly man. One who loves and respects ALL of his fellow men as The Lord God commands us to.
Please reference the Scripture where God commands us to love and respect everybody, regardless of whether they believe in Jesus. Since you seem to be a cherry-picking false Christian-in-name-only, perhaps you could learn a thing or two from Pastor Sampson's sermon on the matter of who True Christians(tm) are to love and respect: Bible Answers: Who are our neighbors? Who are our brothers and sisters? Who are we to love?
2 liters is roughly half a gallon of water. If you don't get at least that much each day (as liquid and/or in food), you die of dehydration.
Really? Calling somebody "retard"? And you're supposed to be a reverend. Calling people names only makes people lose respect for you. Use of the word "retard" as an insult makes you look like you stopped you social development in 3rd grade. It also is highly offensive to those God created with disadvantages in life. They are still God's children, and He loves them just as much as He loves you, and just as much as He loves the person you just insulted. By the way, you can survive indefinitely on 6 ounces of water every other day, if you needed to. It wouldn't be very fun, you would be stricken with cramps and headaches due to dehydration, but you would live. Lastly, there are, in fact, many place in the world where people are dying of dehydration and hunger every day, so to say that not everybody gets their half-gallon to drink is not only correct, but shows global awareness and concern for your fellow man. Shame on you, sir.
Re: Homeschool Science Lessons: Proving atheists wrong with scien
Originally posted by María Gálvez-VillalobosView Post
Hey!!!!!!
Slowwwwwww! OK, I'll dumb it up for you.
Water on Earth: let's take for example the Island of Tabarca near alicante (is lovly by the way and the ferry ahve glass bottom so you can see all God's fishes under the waters so that you're not get boring on the voyage).
Anyway, water is a finite recourse??
Well, Tabarca is a esmall island. Right? good.
If you take one cow to Tabarca and leave him there she will be on there foreverandever, yes? (Obviously cows die in end but water no, but we'll ignore this bit for now...)
So, the people on island of Tabarca think, hey our cow is forever, no? So they start eat bits off it, on Monday a leg, Tuesday a ear etc etc.
Now if the cow was put there 500 years ago, you would espect there be nothing of cow, cos a leg on Monday, ear on Tuesday, half a udder on Wedensday etc....would be no cow left from like hundreds of year ago, yes?!? cLARO QUE SÍ!!!
Sooooo, ...now using brain.....if there is still a cow on Tabarca TODAY.....it mean that cow was only putted there LAST WEEKEND!!!! Otherways, would be no cow left!!!
Same whit water. Earth can no be more than 6,000 years of old!!
Hope I dumb it up enought for you!
YIC, Mari
You're not getting it, Ma'am. Let's say you drink one liter of water right now. What happens to that water? Does it just disappear? Nope. Some is absorbed by your body, some is excreted as sweat, some is eliminated as waste, and the rest is released back into the earth when you die and your physical body decomposes. Unless there's some part of the bible that says that water is finite, and when the people, animals, and plants consume it it is gone forever, then I don't think this argument stands up to critical thinking, even for a creationist.
Re: Homeschool Science Lessons: Proving atheists wrong with scien
Reverend, you are not immune to God's judgement. Calling people names is not OK, and it only causes people to lose respect for you. Also, in case you didn't realize it, there are many places in the world where people are dying of starvation and dehydration every day.
Re: Homeschool Science Lessons: Proving atheists wrong with science
I have several things to say about this. Forgive me if I repeat past commenters, I didn't read all the comments. (I did read enough to see a whole lot of un-Christian behavior out of some so-called Christians. (Really, Reverend? You think God is OK with you calling people "retard"?) 1)Nobody in the secular world purports that there have been 7 billion people on this planet since it formed 4.54 billion years ago. Even if we are only talking about when life began, which is believed to be roughly 3.5 billion years ago, it started with single-celled organisms comprised mostly of water. 2)Human beings aren't the only creatures on the planet that drink water. 3)When you drink water, it doesn't just disappear. Some is absorbed by the body, some is eliminated as waste, some is excreted through your pores as sweat (fun fact: you are sweating right now, even if you don't realize it. It is occurring so slowly and at such a low rate your body heat causes it to evaporate), the rest is returned to the Earth when your body decomposes after death. 4)You cannot use science to prove atheists wrong. Atheists are atheists because of science. What we have here is a poorly thought-out idea. One which must have sounded great to whoever thought it up, but any critical-thinker, be they Creationist, Atheist, Nontheist, Jewish, or whatever, should be able to see the major flaws in this argument. Forgive the pun, but it just doesn't hold water. I hope any reply I get to this isn't hostile. I'm not trying to discredit Creationism as a whole here, I'm just saying that this particular factoid is not usable as an argument for a 6000-year-old planet as opposed to a 4.54 billion-year-old planet. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
in the beginning isnt 5 days before adam is the start of the 1st world age.billions of yrs ago. The earth became void before the 8 day creation. We know from carbon dating it was void for read my lips billions of yrs. Even if your made up idea of the 6000 yr crap. Are you not remembering that 5 days is 5000 yrs to God. Explain your dumb equation now
Such childish prattle. I came up with that idea independently (with heathen presbyterian parents who failed to guide me) when I was 7. By the age of 8, I had dismissed that concept as utter lunacy. To hear adults espousing such crap gives me cause to despair of the (lack of) intelligence of so many today.
I'm not sure where to start with this one. Although I know several Bible references this maniac might have heard aged 1¼ from a dyslexic nun perhaps the Carbon fourteen fallacy is more helpful.
C cannot demonstrate anything millions- or billions- or trillions-of-years old. Here is an accommodating source which describes some of the faith positions held by self-proclaimed "scientists" in the absence of any real evidence, and the false belief concerning millions-of-years it's made quite plain.
in the beginning isnt 5 days before adam is the start of the 1st world age.billions of yrs ago. The earth became void before the 8 day creation. We know from carbon dating it was void for read my lips billions of yrs. Even if your made up idea of the 6000 yr crap. Are you not remembering that 5 days is 5000 yrs to God. Explain your dumb equation now
Please provide a Scriptural reference for your claim above (I bolded it for you).
Leave a comment: