[Titus Templeton]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

I'm not sure that the animals die. I think they just play in the oil, maybe the oil has minerals that are good for their health. So they surely don't do that evolution thing because creationism is right, but they don't die. Its like elephants bathing in dirt and the dirt helps against the sun. Some people do oil on their skin, too. They say it is a sun-protection.

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

This is a quote from EdwardCurrent's YT page.

My religion videos are comedies. I am not a Christian. Through the medium of humor, I try to challenge people to question their beliefs and assumptions so that collectively, we can find ways to accept the world "as is" — that personal purpose and meaning from beyond are *not* behind every event, as many wish were the case. In the 21st century, reasonable, realistic, intelligent people admit that chance is chance, life is finite, and some things are simply unknown. Others feel the need to pump each other up with heartwarming stories that promise comprehensive answers and eternal life...provided you do as you're told.

So some guy who post videos in web, is your evidence for evilution.

Creation wins again!

[Lukandersen]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

This is a quote from EdwardCurrent's YT page.

My religion videos are comedies. I am not a Christian. Through the medium of humor, I try to challenge people to question their beliefs and assumptions so that collectively, we can find ways to accept the world "as is" — that personal purpose and meaning from beyond are *not* behind every event, as many wish were the case. In the 21st century, reasonable, realistic, intelligent people admit that chance is chance, life is finite, and some things are simply unknown. Others feel the need to pump each other up with heartwarming stories that promise comprehensive answers and eternal life...provided you do as you're told.

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

In all his videos, he is sarcastic ( ) , if that did not occur to you yet.

I would not expect Lurpak-worshiper to understand science.

[Lukandersen]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

EdwardCurrent is an atheist.

In all his videos, he is sarcastic ( ) , if that did not occur to you yet.

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Well, it takes thousands of years to evolve in the meaning that it takes thousands of generations with variations of time to have evolution.

Also, the problem with oil is that no animal can survive this toxic waist, and you need surviving individuals to transmit it's 'properties' it's immunity to oil. Oil waists on shores is like no more than 50 years old, and no animals can survive it, so no evolution because no animals carries an immunity because oil is too toxic to oil till there are animals than can survive this and give it's genes to future generations.

This is one example of "fuzzy logic" that evolutionists use. Now, I understand how you people claim your theory works. I understand that a mutated otter would have to survive the oil spill, and he would therefore pass on his genes to other otters, creating an oilproof otter. It's what Darwinists call Natural Selection.

Now, like you said, no individual animals can survive that so no evolution can happen. Yet, the evolutionists ignore this altogether, for example, when trying to explain how fish became land-breathing animals. How could a fish survive being on land to pass on its genes? Even if you took a million, even a billion fish, then put them on land, not a single one would be able to survive that. How then, could fish ever evolve into land-breathing animals?

So, when it comes to filling in the gaps in the evolutionary theory, Darwinists will ignore this and claim that fish evolved lungs, but when there is evidence in front of them (oil slicks and otters), they clam up and say that no animal can survive it.

So, which is it?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Is this some kind of joke, like are you serious. What a fool animals do not adapt instanly to a change in the enviorment you don't understand evolution at all so stop poorly attempting to disprove it.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Is this some kind of joke, like are you serious. What a fool animals do not adapt instanly to a change in the enviorment you don't understand evolution at all so stop poorly attempting to disprove it.

They will die out quickly however. Not die off slowly over generation after generation like Evolution predicts.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Is this some kind of joke, like are you serious. What a fool animals do not adapt instanly to a change in the enviorment you don't understand evolution at all so stop poorly attempting to disprove it.

You really need to work on your reading comprehension.

I gave your 'evillution' 6,001 years to 'evlove' Nothing, nada, zilch, zip. Do you need more time?

[Rapture Eddie]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Is this some kind of joke, like are you serious. What a fool animals do not adapt instanly to a change in the enviorment you don't understand evolution at all so stop poorly attempting to disprove it.

We know all about Evilution that we need to know, son.
If God had meant us to know about such things he's have written it down in the Bible, now wouldn't he?

It's secular propaganda that's what it is. Invented by homosexural scientists so you atheists could go around persecuting Christians even more.

Learning about God and Jesus is all you need.
What could be simpler than knowing that Jesus is HIMself, God AND The Holy Ghost. How cool is that?

Praise The Lord

[Scientistic Fool]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Is this some kind of joke, like are you serious. What a fool animals do not adapt instanly to a change in the enviorment you don't understand evolution at all so stop poorly attempting to disprove it.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

I'll explain this simple:

Evolution happens through the cells of the animals. They do not evolve themselves. Their offsprings will cary a small amount of a different cell. That cell will then be modified furtheron throughout the different offsprings.

Why can't there be otters that have anti-oil furs?
Because evolution doesn't happen in ONE lifespan. It happens in hundreds of lifespans and therefor we do not have oil resistant otters.


You're welcome.

If evolution takes thousands of generations how do you explain quick extinction events like the Dodo? Were is the thousands of generations to kill all those birds dead? Clearly intelligent design is the only explanation for quick extinctions.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

Oil has been with us for nearly 6,001 years. You think evillution did not have enough time to make oil resistant otters in that much time. Please. It is because God does not feel otters need to be oil resistant. Again, very simple.
See, God's intelligent design takes care of and accounts for every single detail in an incredibly simple manner. Secular scientists want us to think it is all complex and mysterious <scary sound>. Poppycock!

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

They do not evolve themselves

Correct.

Genesis 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

They do not evolve

Exactly.

YiC,

Z. Smyth