[Unfalsifiable]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

This is a progressive thread darling, I'm appreciating William's input. Read the thread in its entirety to catch up with what we are discussing at the moment.

[Juliette]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

And Jules, I long ago ditched the idea that people can't be clean shaven, Billy Reuben did well there, but there are still plenty of other rules in Leviticus, including the "don't mar your edges" one, that in theory might still be active today.

Your smarttalk will not be of any help.

Whenever someone showes you evidence of your own faults you're suddenly somewhere else or ignoring everything.

Do you think I'm stupid?

Pastor Billy-Reuben proved you wrong sister. On your very own questions.

And unless you come up with something that looks like a proper answer on that matter you're opinion on whatever is to me as valuable as that of my mothers dog.

[Nobar King]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

you are hundred percent correct he look like big dummy who is try to vogue like Madonna.

only is look cool when I do it

The vogue is still cool!

[Unfalsifiable]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

Are you trying to put limits on what Jesus can do? If Jesus wants to make it OK for us to eat shellfish nowadays, and says so in His Word, who are you to say, "naw-aw, you can't do that Jesus, because shell fish is an abomination". That's what the Pharasiees tried to do.

Ah William, you attribute the error of Smith to Jesus there! It was Smith who came up with the theory and Smith's logic that doesn't hold up, not Jesus's

I don't understand what you are referring to here. What are you claiming that the Bible doesn't say?

Pastor Billy-Reuben

You mention here that you don't understand what I just explained, fair enough. As you now know, i meant the Bible does not say specifically that the abominable acts should be used now-er-days and the others not.

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

Because the abominable acts which Smith claims are the ones that are here to stay, suddenly are not. Showing an inconsistency in the theory that "all the sins we are told are abominable in Leviticus should be kept as sins, and the others not".

Are you trying to put limits on what Jesus can do? If Jesus wants to make it OK for us to eat shellfish nowadays, and says so in His Word, who are you to say, "naw-aw, you can't do that Jesus, because shell fish is an abomination". That's what the Pharasiees tried to do.

The Bible doesn't SAY this, so to claim it is to put a twist on the text, because there is a clear anomaly in shell fish.

I don't understand what you are referring to here. What are you claiming that the Bible doesn't say?

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Unfalsifiable]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

You know pal, one of your central problems is that you are unsaved scum, and therefore incapable of truly comprehending the Word of God.

John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

This explains why false Christians, atheists, and an army of God mockers have spent the last 2,000 years attempting to tear apart and niggardly nit-pick every single verse of the Holy Bible, all to no avail.

Jesus always wins.

Can't a man just work out if he should be eating shellfish and stoning people who work on sundays to death or not without being called trash?

Gosh.

And Jules, I long ago ditched the idea that people can't be clean shaven, Billy Reuben did well there, but there are still plenty of other rules in Leviticus, including the "don't mar your edges" one, that in theory might still be active today.

[Juliette]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

Because the abominable acts which Smith claims are the ones that are here to stay, suddenly are not. Showing an inconsistency in the theory that "all the sins we are told are abominable in Leviticus should be kept as sins, and the others not".

The Bible doesn't SAY this, so to claim it is to put a twist on the text, because there is a clear anomaly in shell fish.

You're retarded boy?

You start some smartass bible-topic to challenge our church. And next you fail to get back to the pastor who made your theory shrink back to what's probably the size of your scrotum. Next you ignore that fault, hope that no one has noticed, and are willing to get back to the point in debate you prefer. Away from your failure that is.

Get back HERE.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

Because the abominable acts which Smith claims are the ones that are here to stay, suddenly are not. Showing an inconsistency in the theory that "all the sins we are told are abominable in Leviticus should be kept as sins, and the others not".

The Bible doesn't SAY this, so to claim it is to put a twist on the text, because there is a clear anomaly in shell fish.

You know pal, one of your central problems is that you are unsaved scum, and therefore incapable of truly comprehending the Word of God.

John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

This explains why false Christians, atheists, and an army of God mockers have spent the last 2,000 years attempting to tear apart and niggardly nit-pick every single verse of the Holy Bible, all to no avail.

Jesus always wins.

[Unfalsifiable]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

How so?


How so?

Because the abominable acts which Smith claims are the ones that are here to stay, suddenly are not. Showing an inconsistency in the theory that "all the sins we are told are abominable in Leviticus should be kept as sins, and the others not".

The Bible doesn't SAY this, so to claim it is to put a twist on the text, because there is a clear anomaly in shell fish.

And I can just picture you lot sitting there in some kind of private room saying "lets bombard falso's thread with rubbish to spoil the discussion". If so, stop it. It is working annoyingly well.

[VictoryOS]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

only is look cool when I do it

This is true, Hitoshi. Somehow the Madonna look suits you perfectly. You must be quite a dancer.

He needs some guidance.

This is true as well.

[Hitoshi]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

And your avatar looks like one of those emo myspace profile photos that you take of yourself because you don't have any real life friends to take a picture for you.

you are hundred percent correct he look like big dummy who is try to vogue like Madonna.

only is look cool when I do it

[Juliette]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

Nobody is listening to you any more.

And your avatar looks like one of those emo myspace profile photos that you take of yourself because you don't have any real life friends to take a picture for you.

Don't attack the boy in person dear Sister. He needs some guidance.

I'm sure Jesus would like him to get back to Pastor Billy-Reuben as I pointed out earlier.

[VictoryOS]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

But that kind of scraps Smiths theory and puts a twist on the Bible.

Nobody is listening to you any more.

And your avatar looks like one of those emo myspace profile photos that you take of yourself because you don't have any real life friends to take a picture for you.

[Juliette]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

But that kind of scraps Smiths theory and puts a twist on the Bible.

You're the one twisting guy.

Being a woman baking pies is more my department instead of bible study.

But I recognize someone failing in his logic and dancing around it when I see it.

With that remark Pastor Billy-Reuben blew your basic statement away.

I was saying these laws are all written in the same book (lev), should they be treated the same? I find it difficult to see how judging them as ceremonial and moral works, as either can easily be seen as either, frankly.

To me it seems either faggotary is not officially outlawed along with shaving, or they are both outlawed.

Get back here and answer boy.

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Bible Time with Falso

But that kind of scraps Smiths theory

How so?

puts a twist on the Bible.

How so?