No, not really. Not with current technology anyways.
In fact, I've been thinking about this topic for a few years. I've come into the conclusion that if in fact some stellar objects do not exist, they would have to be outside the solar system. Well, of course the bodies within our solar system can be... fake, too, although that would require a massive conspiracy to exist.
With my current equipment I can't prove nor disprove planets' existence, so I'll go with the easiest solution.
I don't think I understand. Are you saying that some of the stuff I see in the sky when I go outside at night (a cloudless and preferably moonless night) does not exist? How is it that I see them, then? (I'm not saying these are "planets" or whatever, but I definitely see flickering lights and such).
That's very nice, dear, but frankly, what other choice do you have? Is there any other "planet" that you think you could move to?
No, not really. Not with current technology anyways.
In fact, I've been thinking about this topic for a few years. I've come into the conclusion that if in fact some stellar objects do not exist, they would have to be outside the solar system. Well, of course the bodies within our solar system can be... fake, too, although that would require a massive conspiracy to exist.
With my current equipment I can't prove nor disprove planets' existence, so I'll go with the easiest solution.
Right, with all the evidences I've shown earlier and the many other scientific evidences that exists. A simple exemple would fit your level of intelligence ( Wouldn't surprise me that this isn't enough ) : Pick a tennis ball ( representing earth ) and a basket ball ( representing the sun,). Put the tennis ball at arm length at head level and put the basketball away like 50 meters away from you, which one seems smaller?
If the basketball is on fire like the Sun, pretty soon it will burn away entirely. Anyway, why not use a lump of coal to be more accurate.
LOL, then why isn't there smoke above it?
There is. It's called the Solar corona.
I guess gawd wasn't powerful enough to make a sun with an infinite reserve of energy as he has to relie on combustible fuel hahahaha, how silly.
Making a Sun with an infinite reserve of energy would have been silly, since God planned to destroy the Earth after several thousand years.
Yes, that must be it, that's why people can fly planes from east to west without being sucked into the depth?
What about the Malaysian airliner that disappeared without a trace?
Please, show to me where exactly is this edge of the world on a map? hahahaha
It's at the edge of the map. Are you really so stupid that you can't find the edge of a map?
Yes, a version written by a corrupt king more than a millenium after after the creation of the old testament. That makes total sense.
You are right to bring them up. Planets are yet another example of scientists proving themselves to be CONSTANTLY wrong. When I was a child I was told that there were 9 planets, now they have had a recount and they say there are now only 8. They expect us to believe them when they say that the universe is 13,750,000,000 years old but they can't even count up to 9 properly.
YIC
Jack
uhm that is not true, we discarded Pluto as a planet because we got better technology to look even beyond and localize many other pluto-like masses and even bigger, so instead of adding planets, we counted them out of the planet category. We update based on new data, that is what science is about. We know things based on what we can prove. You could see it if you look at space with the Hubble telescope. The government couldnt possibly affect a telescope to fool you. The proof is out there.
Because the English word "messiah" is simply a loanword carried over into English.
No it isn't. Its a Hebrew word.
JOHN 1 41 He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. 42 And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. KJV..Greek
Yes, they had two words. But they chose their own pre-existing word, JESUS CHRIST, just as we do today. Iin the list you posted there was no evidence AT ALL for Zeus being called anything with the christ– root.
We have seen how the atheist tries to diminish the Majrsty of Christ by relegating Jesus to the also-rans, deceptions such as Zeus, Isis, Astarte, Molech. These fictional entities have no basis in reality except insofar as they are co-opted by demons to lead people astray.
In the Greek language, they already had a word reserved for Jesus. I requested evidence for its use otherwise but the best effort was quite a washout. Jesus was unique then and remains unique today. He made the stars also.
That's right. The Sun is the same size as the Moon. Any idiot can see that with the naked eye.
Right, with all the evidences I've shown earlier and the many other scientific evidences that exists. A simple exemple would fit your level of intelligence ( Wouldn't surprise me that this isn't enough ) : Pick a tennis ball ( representing earth ) and a basket ball ( representing the sun,). Put the tennis ball at arm length at head level and put the basketball away like 50 meters away from you, which one seems smaller?
That's proof that this number is bogus right there. Why would anyone want to multiply a distance by a temperature? And, for heaven's sake, can we all keep the atheistic metric system out of this? We should really be doing any equations in terms of nanocubits.
It's not all coal. Some of it is wood and some of it is manna burning and some of it is probably brimstone left over from when God created Hell.
LOL, then why isn't there smoke above it? I guess gawd wasn't powerful enough to make a sun with an infinite reserve of energy as he has to relie on combustible fuel hahahaha, how silly.
When people fall off the edge of the Earth, they can't just climb back up from Hell and tell you about it. Duh.
Yes, that must be it, that's why people can fly planes from east to west without being sucked into the depth? Please, show to me where exactly is this edge of the world on a map? hahahaha
Finally, you say something that makes sense.People who believe everything they read will be caught in the Devil's trap for sure. The only thing that people should accept blindly is the Holy Bible, 1611 King James Version.
Yes, a version written by a corrupt king more than a millenium after after the creation of the old testament. That makes total sense.
So why was there a Greek word for Messiah? Why didn't they use that?
I don't want to know what it means, I want to know why they had the word at all. Perhaps you have some examples of Zeus being called "christos" (although Zeus would probably get the vocative case) or Bacchus perhaps or a Cyclops or perchance the Minotaur?
I'd like to see them.
Because the English word "messiah" is simply a loanword carried over into English. Hahaha
The original word is the Hebrew word מָשִׁיחַ (English transliteration: mashiach). This is an adjective which literally translates into English as "anointed."
These words weren't specificaly created for your biblical beliefs. A title is a title. Many other god, such as zeus, had many other titles and ways to call him. http://www.theoi.com/Cult/ZeusTitles.html , that doesn't mean all these titles words were specificaly made for him.
Your argument is illogical and spawned out of ignorance.
Othe real value of the Wien's displacement constant is equal to 2.8977721(26)×10−3 m K .
That's proof that this number is bogus right there. Why would anyone want to multiply a distance by a temperature? And, for heaven's sake, can we all keep the atheistic metric system out of this? We should really be doing any equations in terms of nanocubits.
Also, saying that god is fueling the sun with coal is pretty funny in my opinion.
It's not all coal. Some of it is wood and some of it is manna burning and some of it is probably brimstone left over from when God created Hell.
Dunno why but since I was born, I've never heard of someone falling off the edge of the earth, wouldn't that be pretty obvious issue if earth was flat? ( logic hurts I know )
When people fall off the edge of the Earth, they can't just climb back up from Hell and tell you about it. Duh.
You know, I could say the same to you: Don't just blindly believe everything you read.
Finally, you say something that makes sense.People who believe everything they read will be caught in the Devil's trap for sure. The only thing that people should accept blindly is the Holy Bible, 1611 King James Version.
So why was there a Greek word for Messiah? Why didn't they use that?
I don't want to know what it means, I want to know why they had the word at all. Perhaps you have some examples of Zeus being called "christos" (although Zeus would probably get the vocative case) or Bacchus perhaps or a Cyclops or perchance the Minotaur?
You can determine an exoplanet is habitable if it's in the circumstellar habitable zone of it's system. The reason they had to relie on undirect proofs is that this planet is 22 light years away, looking at it with a telescope is hard
Yes - I am sure it is hard to look something that does not exist
In the same article they say '' At the same time, subtracting the starspot signal actually made the evidence for three other worlds in the Gliese 581 system—planets b, c, and e, all of which are too hot to be habitable—even stronger. '' So your very own articles says that they found other planets in the process, hahahaha.
Yes, they found these other "planets" with the same "does not exist" - method. Very impressive.
Woo....first they talk about "potentially habitable Planet" and they are all the time unsure of its existance. Oh yes, I know that lying is scientific method at work.
It is quite ridiculous that people who call themself "scientists" base their opinions on something like that, something which existance is totally impossible to prove
2 Chronicles 20:20
You're simply ignorant.
You can determine an exoplanet is habitable if it's in the circumstellar habitable zone of it's system. The reason they had to relie on undirect proofs is that this planet is 22 light years away, looking at it with a telescope is hard, as there might be problems starspot signals and transits. In the same article they say '' At the same time, subtracting the starspot signal actually made the evidence for three other worlds in the Gliese 581 system—planets b, c, and e, all of which are too hot to be habitable—even stronger. '' So your very own articles says that they found other planets in the process, hahahaha.
They clearly say they had problem to detect that planet in that system due to a phenomenon.
Best "scientific" excuse ever! True Christian ladies of Landover, do not try this at home. "I'm sorry, husband, I was unable to cook your dinner today due to a phenomenon."
Leave a comment: