[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Finally - Science acknowledges truth

How is

If God created the world, it would be intricate and dynamic. The world is intricate and dynamic. Therefore, God created the world.

Any different from

If God created the world, it would be intricate and dynamic. The world is intricate and dynamic. Therefore, God did not create the world.

?

We have the Bible(KJV1611) on our side, you just have a brainwashed secular world view that has a very obvious political agenda.

YIC

[Thinks Design]

Re: Finally - Science acknowledges truth

I do believe that the world is intricate and dynamic and on Earth it is perfectly suited for human life. I do not see any evidence for God anywhere so I don't believe that.

This is all evidence of the Intelligent Designer (God). The sheer level of complexity the giants causeway displays is a prime example of irriducable complexity.

Only God could handle the infinite decisions required to create and maintain the universe.

Don't let your paradigm blind you from the truth.

ThinksDesign

[bobbyd]

Re: Finally - Science acknowledges truth

Sir, the fallacy YOU are presenting is false dichotomy!

A: I know God did it
B: I DO know how it happened - God did it!

It's all there in the Bible if you care to look...

It is impossible to know God did "it". God is part of faith. You may have complete faith that God did "it" but it is impossible to know. Furthermore, I am not presenting a false dichotomy. I did not imply that God doing something and my lack of understanding are mutually exclusive. It is possible that both God did something and I do not understand it.

Think about what you just said.

If human population doubled every increment of time what would happen?



I don't get it, now you are agreeing with them: what kind of scientist are you?

You are never going to get the better of these idiots unless you understand what you are talking about?

Doubling every time increment is not the definition of exponential growth. In fact time is continuous and thus there are inherent increments of time.

How is



Any different from

?

We have the Bible(KJV1611) on our side, you just have a brainwashed secular world view that has a very obvious political agenda.

YIC

This is the point I was trying to make. The two parts of that statement have no causal relationship thus no definitive conclusion can be drawn. In these logical arguments I haven't once said I don't believe God created the world, I have just said you cannot draw that conclusion from the premises set forth.

This is all evidence of the Intelligent Designer (God). The sheer level of complexity the giants causeway displays is a prime example of irriducable complexity.

Only God could handle the infinite decisions required to create and maintain the universe.

Don't let your paradigm blind you from the truth.

ThinksDesign

I have already addressed these two types of fallacies.
Premise A1 - If God created the world, the giants causeway would be complex
Premise A2 - If the big bang created the world, the giants causeway would be complex
Premise A3 - If X created the world, the giants causeway would be complex
Premise B - The giants cause way is complex

Given B you cannot conclude A1, A2 or A3 definitively.

[bobbyd]

Re: Finally - Science acknowledges truth

Think about what you just said.

If human population doubled every increment of time what would happen?



I don't get it, now you are agreeing with them: what kind of scientist are you?

You are never going to get the better of these idiots unless you understand what you are talking about?

Doubling every time increment is not the definition of exponential growth. In fact time is continuous and thus there are NO inherent increments of time.

correcting typo