Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

Also humans didn't come from modern day monkeys. We share a commi ancestor about 7 million years ago there was an early form of primate, that primate split off and over millio years of evolution modern monkeys and humans were formed. And your statement about everything coming from monkeys is simply not true. All the other animals you mentioned evolved separately. They all came from a common ancestor, but none of them evolved from anything you see today. And trees shared a common ancestor with everything too, but it was a form of bacteria

You know, I've heard that explanation about the monkeys before. Every time I visit a zoo and ponder this I wonder why it is that I am on the outside of the cage and they are on the inside - or more directly, why I can read the New York Times and they can't.

So, if trees came from bacteria then where did animals come from?

All this science stuff sounds great on paper sometimes, but the bottom line is that they can't even figure out where Obama was really born.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

So, the new deal with you atheists is we didn't come from monkeys, we came from trees.

Are you writing comedy for Christian stand ups?

I'd heard hiccups is "proof" humans evolved from fish!

A Monkey's Uncle

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

And trees shared a common ancestor with everything too,

So, the new deal with you atheists is we didn't come from monkeys, we came from trees.

Are you writing comedy for Christian stand ups?

[James Hutchins]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

The word theory in science means an explanation for an onserved set of data. It is overwhelmingly supported by evidence so much so it is ultimately a fact

No, the word 'theory' means 'I refuse to listen to the facts and have instead choosen a completely irrational, make beleive explanation.'

We follow the Bible friend, filled with first hand accounting of the facts regarding the Creation by God.

[Basilissa]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

Also humans didn't come from modern day monkeys. We share a commi ancestor

I do not have any "commies" among my ancestors!!!!

about 7 million years ago there was an early form of primate, that primate split off and over millio years of evolution modern monkeys and humans were formed. And your statement about everything coming from monkeys is simply not true. All the other animals you mentioned evolved separately. They all came from a common ancestor, but none of them evolved from anything you see today. And trees shared a common ancestor with everything too, but it was a form of bacteria

Care to support any of your false claim with a shred of Biblical evidence?

Also, I don't think you have an introduction thread.

[Bostonthinker]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

Also humans didn't come from modern day monkeys. We share a commi ancestor about 7 million years ago there was an early form of primate, that primate split off and over millio years of evolution modern monkeys and humans were formed. And your statement about everything coming from monkeys is simply not true. All the other animals you mentioned evolved separately. They all came from a common ancestor, but none of them evolved from anything you see today. And trees shared a common ancestor with everything too, but it was a form of bacteria

[Bostonthinker]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

The word theory in science means an explanation for an onserved set of data. It is overwhelmingly supported by evidence so much so it is ultimately a fact

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

Indeed, brother! Although I can kind of see where they get the idea.

[Nobar King]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

At least we know where the AIDS came from.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys?

Rupert Sheldrake. Maniac.

He wanted to explain just the sort of phenomenon you've highlighted, Mr Percy. How did the trees know there would be monkeys? Or monkeys, trees? To paraphrase: there was a morphic resonance prior to the separation of trees and monkeys resulting in a [time shifted, presumably] symbiosis and the perfect fit between the branch and the monkey's tail we see today.

Once the "scientist" rejects God, everything becomes warped. All theories are self-referential. If there was no "common ancestor" there would be no monkeys, apes, humans, fish or trees. Or, in Sheldrake's case, no oceans either since there would be no morphogenetic field to call them into existence.

Those are not my opinions, by the way. Just to clarify.

A New Science of Life; The Hypothesis of Formative Causation.

Much of my work in the following years was concerned with following up these ideas and was summarised in my main theoretical work, The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature, published in 1988. In late 1980s and early 1990s I explored a variety of experimental approaches for the investigation of unexplained phenomena that might help to enlarge our scientific view of the world, summarised in my book
Seven Experiments That Could Change the World: A Do-It-Yourself Guide to Revolutionary Science, (1994). [I have decided to leave the titles in the quote, hope that's OK]

One of the seven experiments concerned unexplained abilities of animals, and I published a series of papers on the unexplained powers of animals.
See papers on Unexplained Powers of Animals

I summarised much of this research in my book
Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home, And Other Unexplained Powers of Animals (1999).

Also, since the late 1980’s I have been doing research on the sense of being stared at, which has wide implications for the nature of vision and of minds, and this research was described in a series of papers
See papers on The Sense of Being Stared At .
This research is summarized in my book,
The Sense of Being Stared At, And Other Aspects of the Extended Mind (2003).

See Morphic Fields for a general introduction to the theory. [linked in the source]

[Brother_Percy]

Why Do Atheists Believe Everything Came From Monkeys??


Friends,

Ask any atheist a question on evolution theory, you always hear the same answer : Monkeys.

Monkeys... Monkeys... Monkeys... Monkeys...

They don't even question it! No, they just take it at face value based on some silly science fiction book by some old dead guy. And no matter how many times you try to explain to them what the word 'theory' actually means, you get the same moronic response : Monkeys.

EVERYTHING comes from monkeys.

Not only that, but they fail to even address the one simple question that the ridiculous evolution theory raises : "If everything came from monkeys, then why are there monkeys still around today? Why haven't they evolved into stuff too??"

It's insane, friends. So, what?? They expect us to believe that humans came from monkeys? That cats came from monkeys? That dogs came from monkeys? That fish and birds and elephants and racoons came from monkeys?? Seriously, how can they seriously believe a monkey could turn into a gigantic fish like a whale? It's retarded!

Or what about a tree? Trees dont even have hair or tails or monkey-parts?? Still, I guess monkeys swing from trees, so they must somehow figure this means monkeys must have turned into them?? A fine example of atheist logic right there, friends, or should I say the lack of it.

Yes, further proof that atheists are just a bunch of mindless braindead sheep who will believe anything that Darwin guy tells them! And he's dead!!! I guess worshipping monkeys didn't turn out too good for him, huh?

Nope, Not. One. Bit. Amen!