[Greener]

Re: The human eye does NOT have a blind spot!

Please don't try to teach me medicine Anatomy. I'm a doctor ok? Just read again carefully my explanation. Thank you.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: The human eye does NOT have a blind spot!

Please don't try to teach me medicine Anatomy. I'm a doctor ok? Just read again carefully my explanation. Thank you.

Your explanation makes no sense, dear. And if you truly are a doctor, you should demand your money back from whatever institution sold you that so-called "education." You'd do better reading the Holy Bible and begging the Lord Jesus for mercy.

[Greener]

Re: The human eye does NOT have a blind spot!

Luke 6:42

[Didymus Much]

Re: The human eye does NOT have a blind spot!

Luke 6:42

So?

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The human eye does NOT have a blind spot!

So?

I thimk what's being demonstrated there is what happens when God's Inerrant Word is quoted out of context. Here is the whole passage:

LUKE 6
39 And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? shall they not both fall into the ditch?
40 The disciple is not above his master: but every one that is perfect shall be as his master.
41 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
42 Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother's eye.
43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
44 For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes.
45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.
46 And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?
KJV .. look up . context

Now as an atheist you already understand the "value" of just quoting random stuff and all the atheists go Yay but God doesn't work that way. You parrot "facts" but we have The Truth©1611.

"Motes and beams!" blurts that secularist doctor.

Can you see the problem? It's like sitting everyone down around the campfire for a story as follows:

Long ago in a wonderful land where snowflakes are diamonds lived a handsome cerise cabbage farmer.
The sky was blue.
The sun was yel-low.
END OF STORY
:
:
:
:
:
?

See how there's something missing? Well, you probably can't my example already being better than the sort of stuff we're used to by now from atheists—and papists too for that matter—hanging around here. What's missing is the actual story. And so with this doctor. To say that motes aren't beams isn't really saying anything because everyone already knows that. Even as Jesus continues His parable we don't need to be told that figs grow on fig trees and apples grow on apple trees and that nothing grows on dead trees. Jesus isn't teaching us that things grow on trees. He combines both elements (beams and fruit) to make the point that quoting Scripture but not applying it is dumb. Big dumb.

Indeed it is a particularly unfortunate selection from "the doctor" in this case because, as the linked reference context shows very clearly, Jesus knew what was about to happen next. That means after He'd finished explaining the parable.

EVIDENCE

Jesus had said: Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like: He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock. And sure enough in Capernaum there was someone whose faith was just such a house built upon rock. A centurion whose servant who was dear unto him, was sick, and ready to die. Jesus recognised that degree of faith and commended it as Luke's historical account records: When Jesus heard these things, he marvelled at him, and turned him about, and said unto the people that followed him, I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.

Jesus is God.

God is always consistent, particularly where apothecaries and physicians are concerned, and it bodes ill for those who trust such bellicose inanities. Neil deGrasse Tyson exemplifies the type spouting off about how life is an inevitable consequence of complex chemistry which is direct challenge to God.

PROOF

II CHRONICLES 16
12…Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease was exceeding great: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the physicians.
13 And Asa slept with his fathers, and died in the one and fortieth year of his reign.
14a And they buried him in his own sepulchres..
KJV .. look up . context . whole chapter

To die from trench foot is not generally thought of a desirable exit, but it is fairly rapid I understand, weeks or perhaps a few months of agony. Asa however shook his fist at The LORD, which is another name for Jesus, and the "doctors" not only failed to cure him but brought down 3 years of additional suffering.

Asa could have been healed just as that centurion's servant was healed. One is an example of good fruit explicitly presented as growing from the good tree of Faith.

The other is corrupt fruit growing from the corrupt tree of medical "science"

In both examples we see disease manifesting and in both cases healing was possible, those are facts. But facts alone (or even at all) do not bring healing. That comes from God. Jesus knew that when He shared the parable in Luke 6, remembered Asa's snub, knew that the centurion would be consulting Him in Capernaum.

In doctors versus God, doctors always lose.

Jesus always wins.

And that's the Truth.