WE'RE WINNING

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

... that supports the theory of evolution by natural selection....

This isn't just about faith, friend. This is also about not being duped by the latest scientific fad. Scientists come up with all kinds of hair-brained theories because they need something to set them apart because the competition for money from Big Pharmaceuticals is so great. Big Pharma decides what "science" will be fashionable, and scientists run right out to find anything that might stand for evidence, write it up, make whatever statistical magic happen, and get money.

Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

It's not that our faith is not strong, it's that we are fighting a Spiritual War here (Ephesians 6:12; 2 Corinthians 10:3-5; 1 John 5:4-5; Revelation 12:7-9), and we refuse to let Satan have our children. Not all children have parents who are strong in the faith, but they deserve to hear the Truth, too: If you never hear of Jesus during your life, you will go to hell.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

The Bible is a great book, filled with much wisdom, but it simply IS NOT literally true, especially when it comes to matters of science. Why don't you instead support the scientific study of God's wonderful Creation? Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

Both the Old Testament and the New Testament cite the Genesis creation account as literally true. I guess we're supposed to believe what you say about God's Word instead of what God's Word says about God's Word?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

There is nothing incompatible between Darwinian evolution and the idea that the Universe, and human beings, had a creator. You Biblical literalists are painting yourselves into a corner from which you can't escape--anybody who takes a paleontology class can see for herself the evidence that supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.

The Bible is a great book, filled with much wisdom, but it simply IS NOT literally true, especially when it comes to matters of science. Why don't you instead support the scientific study of God's wonderful Creation? Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

Well that's just crazy talk. Are you saying that the Ressurection is not literal? Lazarus coming back from the dead? Jesus walking on the water and turning the water into wine?

What metric do you use to decide what is literal and what is not, in the Bible? If God had not wanted it in the Bible do you not think He has the power to remove it?

Or do you ignore God's omnipotence, also?

Think about it. God bless.

[Didymus Much]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

...Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

Let me rephrase: Is your faith in science really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

[Donovan A. Mordecai]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

There is nothing incompatible between Darwinian evolution and the idea that the Universe, and human beings, had a creator. You Biblical literalists are painting yourselves into a corner from which you can't escape--anybody who takes a paleontology class can see for herself the evidence that supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.

The Bible is a great book, filled with much wisdom, but it simply IS NOT literally true, especially when it comes to matters of science. Why don't you instead support the scientific study of God's wonderful Creation? Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

What is it about halloween time of year that drives the crazies into the public sphere.

Why would you seek to reconcile The Truth™ with some secular diatribe used to justify nambla?

God Bless
DAM

[Pastor Ed Lowman]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

There is nothing incompatible between Darwinian evolution and the idea that the Universe, and human beings, had a creator. You Biblical literalists are painting yourselves into a corner from which you can't escape--anybody who takes a paleontology class can see for herself the evidence that supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.

The Bible is a great book, filled with much wisdom, but it simply IS NOT literally true, especially when it comes to matters of science. Why don't you instead support the scientific study of God's wonderful Creation?

Scientific study cannot save my soul, neither can arrogant people standing in white coats thinking they know better than God. Until they can, I'll go with Jesus my Savior.

Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

No, it isn't. No faith should be strong enough to believe that God made the worlds, but for some reason went really slowly to let it evolve, making God's direction unneeded and useless. That is just stupid.

The Bible says SIX DAYS was the creation time for everything (see Genesis 1-2; Exodus 20:11). Why isn't that good enough for you?

Either God created us or He didn't. Now choose.

Pastor Ed

[StarrKingGrad]

Re: WE'RE WINNING

There is nothing incompatible between Darwinian evolution and the idea that the Universe, and human beings, had a creator. You Biblical literalists are painting yourselves into a corner from which you can't escape--anybody who takes a paleontology class can see for herself the evidence that supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.

The Bible is a great book, filled with much wisdom, but it simply IS NOT literally true, especially when it comes to matters of science. Why don't you instead support the scientific study of God's wonderful Creation? Is your faith really not strong enough to live with the facts instead of your fantasies?

[Nobar King]

Re: WE

Hey, if you don't like what you are hearing, all you have to do is cover your ears! Even scientists know this.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Oh friends! Glorious Day!

Starting today, PopularScience.com will no longer accept comments on new articles. Here's why.

Siting some opinions written in the New York Times,

• Uncivil comments not only polarized readers, but they often changed a participant's interpretation of the news story itself.
• In the civil group, those who initially did or did not support the technology — whom we identified with preliminary survey questions — continued to feel the same way after reading the comments. Those exposed to rude comments, however, ended up with a much more polarized understanding of the risks connected with the technology.
• Simply including an ad hominem attack in a reader comment was enough to make study participants think the downside of the reported technology was greater than they'd previously thought.

Siting another opinion piece in the same New York Times:

• IN 1982, polls showed that 44 percent of Americans believed God had created human beings in their present form. Thirty years later, the fraction of the population who are creationists is 46 percent.

PRAISE JESUS ALL GLORY TO GOD!

In this day of information, the Word of God is overshadowing the gospel of science! More and more people are distrusting these scientists and looking to the LORD for the Truth! And this has the Darwinists running scared! They can't handle people knowing what they're up to, so they have to hide it! HA! Just like those Roman Papists who wouldn't let people read the Holy Bible and had it printed only in Latin so the average American couldn't read it. But the LORD's Will Be Done! And His People Will Know The Truth!

Abraham Trusted God Enough To Lead His Innocent Son
To An Out Of The Way Place For The Purpose Of
Tying Him Up, Slitting His Throat, And Burning His Body
For The Glory Of God!

Genesis 22:1-7