[Phil Ander]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I've seen reports that Harry & Meg have been giving out food to some homeless people in LA. Perhaps some unpaid job experience when Harry applies to be an Uber Eats driver.

Phil

[WWJDnow]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

President Trump can always throw Harry out, but unless he denationalizes The Duchess of Sparkle for un-American activities, America is stuck...

She's colored, so why doesn't she go back to Africa with the rest of her people? That's her real homeland. She probably came back to collect some more welfare checks.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

In the meantime, lets keep requesting they go home.

The problem for America, Brother Mr Mayor, Sir, is that she at least IS home. She's not a British citizen, having spent very little time in the country. Although technically she doesn't need a visa to travel to Britain, her permission to stay for more than 6 months will have lapsed when she flounced out. President Trump can always throw Harry out, but unless he denationalizes The Duchess of Sparkle for un-American activities, America is stuck with her.


Let's look on the bright side. If it turns out to be true that they've bought Mel Gibson's mansion, complete with the kangaroos loose in the top paddock, then presumably Gibson will be leaving?

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

It's discouraging, but our efforts to keep Harry and Meghan out of the U. S. seem to have failed. Rumor has it they will purchase a $15 million little place in Malibu. Perhaps some day there will be a Godly Republican governor again, another Arnold Schwarzeneger, who will guard the border and keep them from infecting other states.

In the meantime, lets keep requesting they go home.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-are-reportedly-buying-a-huge-dollar15-million-malibu-mansion/ar-BB12wGco?ocid=spartandhp

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

The man formerly known as Prince Harry, HRH the Duke of Wherever and Thane of Somewhere Else, has flown from Vancouver to Edinburgh, Scotland, to deliver a sanctimonious lecture on the importance of people not making unnecessary long-haul trips. I guess his people didn't think this through? It would have been too much to expect that he would.

But the main point of "interest" is that he asked to be introduced simply as "Harry". He is apparently going for the coveted Single-Name-Celeb status, like Cher, Björk, Liberace, or Sooty and Sweep.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I remember a movie I saw years ago where the Royal Family was wiped out during a family photograph activity and some obscure American named Ralph was called over to be the new King. Harry's wife is in the movie business and she may have seen that movie.

Very possibly, Brother. Sadly for her, this would not play well with her potential "subjects", as she lacks the good looks and personal charisma of John Goodman.

[Alvin Moss]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Are you suggesting that the not-princess Merkel's contacts within the Toronto soap-opera community have taken out a contract on William's three children? Oh my goodness, that hadn't even occurred to the British tabloid press! If you will excuse me, I have a couple of calls to make....

Sister, I think you may be on to something. This could all be some kind of elaborate and complicated coup, designed to cut out the other members of the Royal Family and make Harry the King. Now that he is married to a Negress, he is subjected to the roiling passions and schemes of that race. He may be under the control of his wife. They may be planning that Parliament will ask Harry to return with his multi-cultural wife so that he may take the crown in the wake of some terrible tragedy. I remember a movie I saw years ago where the Royal Family was wiped out during a family photograph activity and some obscure American named Ralph was called over to be the new King. Harry's wife is in the movie business and she may have seen that movie. The schemes and plots of Negroes are often amusing, but sometimes they take a dark turn. The Queen and the rest of them better watch out.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Now, then, as for keeping Harry (Ginger) and Meghan (Nutmeg) over in the UK instead of letting them settle in North America, why, I've heard that even the Queen no longer wants them there. Apparently, Nutmeg has been telling her friends that the Queen "doesn't have a legal leg to stand on", regarding when she was told she could not use "royal" any longer. This, quite naturally, has infuriated the Queen to no end!

Sources very close to the Palace assure me that the Queen is only pretending to be annoyed and that in fact it is Her Maj who is trolling Hankies'n'Mugs (their new domain name), rather than vice-versa. She really is rather a naughty monarch.

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Oh, poor child! I guess that would explain the horrified look in her eyes, witch-like hairdo, extravagant head-pieces, and all of the other psychological problems that she must be enduring.

Oh, yes, I do think that this is the case, dear Sister Basilissa. The emotional scars must run very deep in this poor girl. And, in that photo of her wearing that strange headpiece, I just noticed that she is wearing a doily around her neck! Why, I have a doily (crocheted by my own hands) that is very similar. It is on my Chippendale pie-crust, side tea table, currently displaying one of my lovely cranberry epergnes (tagged, "For Larry").

Now, then, as for keeping Harry (Ginger) and Meghan (Nutmeg) over in the UK instead of letting them settle in North America, why, I've heard that even the Queen no longer wants them there. Apparently, Nutmeg has been telling her friends that the Queen "doesn't have a legal leg to stand on", regarding when she was told she could not use "royal" any longer. This, quite naturally, has infuriated the Queen to no end!

https://www.newidea.com.au/meghan-snaps-back-at-queen-over-demand-she-stop-using-her-royal-title?category=royals

[Basilissa]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

And, isn't she the daughter of a prince who has controversial friends?

Oh, poor child! I guess that would explain the horrified look in her eyes, witch-like hairdo, extravagant head-pieces, and all of the other psychological problems that she must be enduring.

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Others wondered if it came from a bathroom supplies shop.

Oh, Dear Heaven above! My, my; Sister Joanna, that princess most definitely has questionable tastes in millinery choices. Why, when I saw her wearing that "hat" at the wedding, all I could think of was of a similar situation that I'd seen on a TV show at one time (photo attached). And, isn't she the daughter of a prince who has controversial friends?

[Basilissa]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

And English taxpayers are paying for this?!

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

That object rather struck me as architecture than millinery.

Others wondered if it came from a bathroom supplies shop.

[handmaiden]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

...And also please keep the royals, the ex-royals, the wannabe royals, and any other kind of royals that exists, on the other side of that wall. Amen.
Isn't one (or both) of them a Crazy Hat Lady?

Is this what you were remembering?





That object rather struck me as architecture than millinery.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I sincerely hope that they will be utterly ignored and that we never have to hear about them again.

Indeed. Everything I've learned about this couple has been done against my will. May the LORD bless us for our patience. And soon.