Originally posted by snakeofhell
View Post
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from fake ones)
Originally posted by Sir Bernie View PostSo our knowledge about Harry Potter is out of a book. I totally agree on that. But our knowledge about god is from a book, too. And, as I may say, a much older one!
And Harry Potter is in the present, but the bible was written long time ago. And even long time after the person named Jesus died.
I hope you all know, that you are atheists, too. Or do you believe in Zeus, Hermes or Thor??
You see, you are atheists, too. We are just one god further then you.
Cheers,
Yours Sir
Harry Potter tricks young children into injecting the pot. Potter equals Pot. Pot equals injecting. Injecting equals the lake of fire.
Get right with God, or be left.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Postyeah says a guy who follows a bad harry potter book like his life depends on it.....
Too bad that in reality ad hominem does not take away things YOU have done.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View PostYes, really. Like you just showed that you had no idea what name homo sapiens means. Or that you claimed your job is ancient Roman history while you had no idea about Romans at all, or that you thought that Christopher Columbus was that guys actual name, or that you had no idea about the origins of word Christ, or that you started up by posting plagiarized fairy tales as your own. Just to mention a few.
So really, are you trying to make atheist look stupid? I don't understand why anyone would do such a thing, but I find it hard to believe that someone can actually be that ignorant about everything.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Postfirst its not optional were we come from we are homo sapiens homo meaning self(for our selfishness and violence) sapiens meaning monkey
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Postrealy?
So really, are you trying to make atheist look stupid? I don't understand why anyone would do such a thing, but I find it hard to believe that someone can actually be that ignorant about everything.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View PostI just have to ask one think I'm curious about. Are you trying to make atheist look stupid or something?
From the start, you have only been posting stuff that has made zero sense and has always been historically incorrect. Have you actually ever been in any school or are you just making things up as you go?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Posti wish neanderthals were still around too bad we interbreed with them......
From the start, you have only been posting stuff that has made zero sense and has always been historically incorrect. Have you actually ever been in any school or are you just making things up as you go?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View PostYes, except that homo sapiens means wise man. As in homo meaning man and sapiens wise. Otherwise, almost correct
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Postwe are homo sapiens homo meaning self(for our selfishness and violence) sapiens meaning monkey
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by Basilissa View PostOK then. I'll take this nonsensical string of words as proof of congenital birth defects.
I don't know how about you, but I certainly do not descend from monkeys. I do not descend from apes, either.
By the way. I am somewhat familiar with the whole evolution thingy, and let me tell you that what you say about the human ancestors 200,000 years ago (who did not exist because the world did not exist at that time) varies greatly from what the evolutionists say. I guess you're too dumb for science, not just too dumb for religion.
I'll stop praying fro you now, because I see you're a lost cause.
first its not optional were we come from we are homo sapiens homo meaning self(for our selfishness and violence) sapiens meaning monkey
ok our template animal is very similar to a modern day bonobo yet different due to the fact we unlike bonobos are capable of violence and selfishness and you know why we were violent unlike bonobos?
i will give evidence in a link if asked
because in short we evolved in a area were we needed to fight to survive evolution so we became smarter and more violent.
look theology is not science its the equivalent of a bunch of nerds bickering over a comic book its exactly the same..... thats all you are nerds bickering over a book.....
and praying has never helped anyone
btw it varies greatly because more and more proof comes up and we adjust to our knowledge of these things with the new facts we discover...
so i can say with all the enthusiasm in the world religion is a bunch of mumbo jumbo there are no gods or in your case god.....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Postyes it is because we were a tribe of monkeys(around a population of 200,000 in Africa mind you) only just working tools out much like monkeys today and there are plenty of them in fact are just learning rocks can break things and sticks can be used to catch ants and termites want a video explaining more?
I don't know how about you, but I certainly do not descend from monkeys. I do not descend from apes, either.
By the way. I am somewhat familiar with the whole evolution thingy, and let me tell you that what you say about the human ancestors 200,000 years ago (who did not exist because the world did not exist at that time) varies greatly from what the evolutionists say. I guess you're too dumb for science, not just too dumb for religion.
I'll stop praying fro you now, because I see you're a lost cause.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by Basilissa View PostOh yeah, because the idea of Adam and Eve as the parents of all humanity is sooooo much different from the Out Of Africa hypothesis pushed by most evolutionists. Oh, wait, don't they call the supposed earliest human ancestor "the Mitochondrial Eve?" As in one woman being the ancestor of all people? And where are your congenital birth defects now, honey?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by snakeofhell View Postcongenital birth defects.....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)
Originally posted by Didymus Much View PostOk, but you'll agree that the average woman giving birth to two children by the age of 25 is perfectly reasonable?
If we take the 4000 (roughly) years since the Flood,
4000/25 = 160 generations
And our population doubles every 25 years,
2^160 = 1.46 x 10^48, or roughly 2,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times as many people as there are on the Earth right now.
What was that you were saying?
Stay in school.
congenital birth defects.....
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: