This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thomas Taylor
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    well first i dont believe in reincarnation its ridiculous much like all religion life theories its just a neat concept i like...unlike any god based theory's...... in no way do i believe in it
    Well, done my boy. You have just admitted that God exists. This shows that there is still hope for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul Ian Pistle
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from fake ones)

    Originally posted by Sir Bernie View Post
    So our knowledge about Harry Potter is out of a book. I totally agree on that. But our knowledge about god is from a book, too. And, as I may say, a much older one!
    And Harry Potter is in the present, but the bible was written long time ago. And even long time after the person named Jesus died.

    I hope you all know, that you are atheists, too. Or do you believe in Zeus, Hermes or Thor??
    You see, you are atheists, too. We are just one god further then you.

    Cheers,

    Yours Sir
    Real atheists, better yet the mentally ill (Satanic Atheists), are full of rage. Lots of stealing, lots of mental illness, and lots of injecting the marijuana. That's usually how I'll spot them. Their passive aggressive behavior, coupled with their intense arrogance and intoxication, it's a sign of true atheism.

    Harry Potter tricks young children into injecting the pot. Potter equals Pot. Pot equals injecting. Injecting equals the lake of fire.

    Get right with God, or be left.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alphonse Alban
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    yeah says a guy who follows a bad harry potter book like his life depends on it.....
    Good comeback, really helps making you look less stupid and diminish all the stupidity you have wrote earlier

    Too bad that in reality ad hominem does not take away things YOU have done.

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeofhell
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View Post
    Yes, really. Like you just showed that you had no idea what name homo sapiens means. Or that you claimed your job is ancient Roman history while you had no idea about Romans at all, or that you thought that Christopher Columbus was that guys actual name, or that you had no idea about the origins of word Christ, or that you started up by posting plagiarized fairy tales as your own. Just to mention a few.

    So really, are you trying to make atheist look stupid? I don't understand why anyone would do such a thing, but I find it hard to believe that someone can actually be that ignorant about everything.
    yeah says a guy who follows a bad harry potter book like his life depends on it.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Attila's Wife
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    first its not optional were we come from we are homo sapiens homo meaning self(for our selfishness and violence) sapiens meaning monkey
    Says the person whose "job" is ancient Roman history? Is there a thread to nominate that for stupidest post of the month?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alphonse Alban
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    realy?
    Yes, really. Like you just showed that you had no idea what name homo sapiens means. Or that you claimed your job is ancient Roman history while you had no idea about Romans at all, or that you thought that Christopher Columbus was that guys actual name, or that you had no idea about the origins of word Christ, or that you started up by posting plagiarized fairy tales as your own. Just to mention a few.

    So really, are you trying to make atheist look stupid? I don't understand why anyone would do such a thing, but I find it hard to believe that someone can actually be that ignorant about everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeofhell
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View Post
    I just have to ask one think I'm curious about. Are you trying to make atheist look stupid or something?

    From the start, you have only been posting stuff that has made zero sense and has always been historically incorrect. Have you actually ever been in any school or are you just making things up as you go?
    realy? that makes zero sense go pray to your god or somthing

    Leave a comment:


  • Alphonse Alban
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    i wish neanderthals were still around too bad we interbreed with them......
    I just have to ask one think I'm curious about. Are you trying to make atheist look stupid or something?

    From the start, you have only been posting stuff that has made zero sense and has always been historically incorrect. Have you actually ever been in any school or are you just making things up as you go?

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeofhell
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View Post
    Yes, except that homo sapiens means wise man. As in homo meaning man and sapiens wise. Otherwise, almost correct
    i wish neanderthals were still around too bad we interbreed with them......

    Leave a comment:


  • Alphonse Alban
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    we are homo sapiens homo meaning self(for our selfishness and violence) sapiens meaning monkey
    Yes, except that homo sapiens means wise man. As in homo meaning man and sapiens wise. Otherwise, almost correct

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeofhell
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
    OK then. I'll take this nonsensical string of words as proof of congenital birth defects.

    I don't know how about you, but I certainly do not descend from monkeys. I do not descend from apes, either.

    By the way. I am somewhat familiar with the whole evolution thingy, and let me tell you that what you say about the human ancestors 200,000 years ago (who did not exist because the world did not exist at that time) varies greatly from what the evolutionists say. I guess you're too dumb for science, not just too dumb for religion.

    I'll stop praying fro you now, because I see you're a lost cause.

    first its not optional were we come from we are homo sapiens homo meaning self(for our selfishness and violence) sapiens meaning monkey


    ok our template animal is very similar to a modern day bonobo yet different due to the fact we unlike bonobos are capable of violence and selfishness and you know why we were violent unlike bonobos?
    i will give evidence in a link if asked

    because in short we evolved in a area were we needed to fight to survive evolution so we became smarter and more violent.

    look theology is not science its the equivalent of a bunch of nerds bickering over a comic book its exactly the same..... thats all you are nerds bickering over a book.....

    and praying has never helped anyone

    btw it varies greatly because more and more proof comes up and we adjust to our knowledge of these things with the new facts we discover...

    so i can say with all the enthusiasm in the world religion is a bunch of mumbo jumbo there are no gods or in your case god.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    yes it is because we were a tribe of monkeys(around a population of 200,000 in Africa mind you) only just working tools out much like monkeys today and there are plenty of them in fact are just learning rocks can break things and sticks can be used to catch ants and termites want a video explaining more?
    OK then. I'll take this nonsensical string of words as proof of congenital birth defects.

    I don't know how about you, but I certainly do not descend from monkeys. I do not descend from apes, either.

    By the way. I am somewhat familiar with the whole evolution thingy, and let me tell you that what you say about the human ancestors 200,000 years ago (who did not exist because the world did not exist at that time) varies greatly from what the evolutionists say. I guess you're too dumb for science, not just too dumb for religion.

    I'll stop praying fro you now, because I see you're a lost cause.

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeofhell
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
    Oh yeah, because the idea of Adam and Eve as the parents of all humanity is sooooo much different from the Out Of Africa hypothesis pushed by most evolutionists. Oh, wait, don't they call the supposed earliest human ancestor "the Mitochondrial Eve?" As in one woman being the ancestor of all people? And where are your congenital birth defects now, honey?
    yes it is because we were a tribe of monkeys(around a population of 200,000 in Africa mind you) only just working tools out much like monkeys today and there are plenty of them in fact are just learning rocks can break things and sticks can be used to catch ants and termites want a video explaining more?

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by snakeofhell View Post
    congenital birth defects.....
    Oh yeah, because the idea of Adam and Eve as the parents of all humanity is sooooo much different from the Out Of Africa hypothesis pushed by most evolutionists. Oh, wait, don't they call the supposed earliest human ancestor "the Mitochondrial Eve?" As in one woman being the ancestor of all people? And where are your congenital birth defects now, honey?

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeofhell
    replied
    Re: Bo's Law (or how to tell real atheists from false ones)

    Originally posted by Didymus Much View Post
    Ok, but you'll agree that the average woman giving birth to two children by the age of 25 is perfectly reasonable?

    If we take the 4000 (roughly) years since the Flood,

    4000/25 = 160 generations

    And our population doubles every 25 years,

    2^160 = 1.46 x 10^48, or roughly 2,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times as many people as there are on the Earth right now.

    What was that you were saying?

    Stay in school.

    congenital birth defects.....

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X