[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: The only one true Religion

I bet you think you're pretty slick Io Freddie.

Care to point out any differences between the 1611 and 1769 translations other than spelling or printing differences?

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

I am not trying to confuse anyone, you are the one that belongs to a church that only accepts the 1611 version, yet you quote the 1769 version.

Why do you quote the 1769 version Lisa?

I am not quoting the 1769 version Jo Freddie. Have you been eating those Alphabet noodles and mixed up the letters.

1611 Version
Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

Later version
Matthew 1:21 And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.”

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

I am not quoting the 1769 version Jo Freddie. Have you been eating those Alphabet noodles and mixed up the letters.

1611 Version
Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

Later version
Matthew 1:21 And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.”

Compare what I have highlighted in your quote with what the 1611 verson ACTUALLY says:

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

I bet you think you're pretty slick Io Freddie.

Care to point out any differences between the 1611 and 1769 translations other than spelling or printing differences?

I am not the one making the claim that the 1611 version is perfect and all others are inferior.

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

Compare what I have highlighted in your quote with what the 1611 verson ACTUALLY says:
[ATTACH]14074[/ATTACH]

I can make up things like that also Jo Freddie. Would you like to me to do one for you.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

I can make up things like that also Jo Freddie. Would you like to me to do one for you.

Anyone can go and find an original copy of the 1611 version and check for themselves, they will see I have made nothing up.

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

Anyone can go and find an original copy of the 1611 version and check for themselves, they will see I have made nothing up.

Oh look, I found a picture from the same book you have been quoting

[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: The only one true Religion

I am not the one making the claim that the 1611 version is perfect and all others are inferior.

OK, let me try to explain this in a way that even your pasta-addled brain can understand.

The KJV 1611 MANUSCRIPT is perfect. Until around 1650 there was no standardization of spelling in English, and early printers were notorious for manipulating that PERFECT MANUSCRIPT in various ways to make their type set fit the page. This means that prior to 1769 there were PERFECT MANUSCRIPTS with IMPERFECT RENDERINGS due to the non-standardization of the text. Get it?

[Imam Rashik]

Re: The only one true Religion

OK, let me try to explain this in a way that even your pasta-addled brain can understand.

The KJV 1611 MANUSCRIPT is perfect. Until around 1650 there was no standardization of spelling in English, and early printers were notorious for manipulating that PERFECT MANUSCRIPT in various ways to make their type set fit the page. This means that prior to 1769 there were PERFECT MANUSCRIPTS with IMPERFECT RENDERINGS due to the non-standardization of the text. Get it?

Lycia that is one reason why The Holy Quran is the only pure Holy Book. You Holy Book has been corrupted.

[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: The only one true Religion

This thread should be renamed "unsaved trash don't understand the differences between a manuscript and a printing".

Lycia that is one reason why The Holy Quran is the only pure Holy Book. You Holy Book has been corrupted.

I just explained that the KJV 1611 is a perfect manuscript. If somebody made a printing of the Quran that didn't print every fifth "t" would you think the Quran is corrupted?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

OK, let me try to explain this in a way that even your pasta-addled brain can understand.

The KJV 1611 MANUSCRIPT is perfect. Until around 1650 there was no standardization of spelling in English, and early printers were notorious for manipulating that PERFECT MANUSCRIPT in various ways to make their type set fit the page. This means that prior to 1769 there were PERFECT MANUSCRIPTS with IMPERFECT RENDERINGS due to the non-standardization of the text. Get it?

So the 1611 version is an imperfect Rendering of the KJV bible and we should look to the 1769 Rendering?

[Imam Rashik]

Re: The only one true Religion

This thread should be renamed "unsaved trash don't understand the differences between a manuscript and a printing".



I just explained that the KJV 1611 is a perfect manuscript. If somebody made a printing of the Quran that didn't print every fifth "t" would you think the Quran is corrupted?

You admit your Holy Book is corrupted and contains errors in printing. The Holy Quran is never written with errors, to do so would be blasphemy. Allah (pbuh) would not be Pleased.

[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: The only one true Religion

So the 1611 version is an imperfect Rendering of the KJV bible and we should look to the 1769 Rendering?

I don't know, pasta-Io. Would you care to point out any differences between the KJV 1611 and the KJV 1769 that are not due to spelling or formatting? If it doesn't have any, then it means the 1769 version IS the 1611 version, just with standardized spelling and printing.

You admit your Holy Book is corrupted and contains errors in printing. The Holy Quran is never written with errors, to do so would be blasphemy. Allah (pbuh) would not be Pleased.

So what you are saying is that it is a physical impossibility for a printing of the Quran to ever accidentally contain errors caused by the printer of the physical book?

[Imam Rashik]

Re: The only one true Religion

So what you are saying is that it is a physical impossibility for a printing of the Quran to ever accidentally contain errors caused by the printer of the physical book?

The Holy Quran has never been made with errors. If a person were to ever make such an error that would be put death.

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

Lycia I suspect Jo Freddie has brought one of his God mocking friends to support him.