[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: REJECTION!

Much easier said than done. It'd be easier to take an advanced physics class from a Belorussian meth addict than it is to read one of your borderline literate posts.

but you wouldnt take an advanced physics class cause that would be secular wouldn't it? but since you can make half way intelligent replies, that tells me you can understand me JUST fine.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: REJECTION!

thats called BLIND faith, i do have faith, not in the same things you do, and its NOT blind, and not just something told me so.
this proves its not blind, they have .......OMG PROOF
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/05/sc...nd-fossil.html

So God's Word isn't proof, but some mouldy old bones are? If I go digging through a negro's trash and find some chicken bones from a bucket of KFC, will that convert you to Christianity? Because if that's that it takes, then I'm willing to do it.

according to your philosiphy, you "bible" is no more factual my my bones.

Did you just claim that God Himself wrote your bones?

did you know that people make the words of jesus, thay just sit there with a bunch of words and fit them together to make abuch of cra and hen.

I'm not sure what kind of measurement of quantity an "abuch" is, nor do I know what a "cra" is or why you'd want to pair it with a hen. Is that an incantation for some sort of wicker spell?

I think "abuch of cra and hen" is an old Welsh recipe. Friend, here at Landover we are Godly, clean-living people, and we do not engage in Welsh cooking!

remind me again how im a liar
??

You claimed that "as soon as [we] understand why [we] disbelieve and rejecty all other gods and religions, [we] will understand why [you] disbelieve in [ours]." Sister Mary showed that it is perfectly possible to understand why we "disbelieve and rejecty all other gods and religions", without understanding why you disbelieve in ours. Therefore, your statement was a lie. Now do you understand?

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: REJECTION!

you still dont understand.
I disbelieve in yours for much the same reasons you disbelieve in mine. except my reasons, are much more.....reasonable.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: REJECTION!

you still dont understand.
I disbelieve in yours for much the same reasons you disbelieve in mine. except my reasons, are much more.....reasonable.

Either they're the same or they aren't. We disbelieve in other religions because the Bible tells us to. Now, either you reject Christ because the Bible tells you to (in which case you're insane), or you don't, in which case your reasons aren't the same, in which case you're a liar.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: REJECTION!

Either they're the same or they aren't. We disbelieve in other religions because the Bible tells us to. Now, either you reject Christ because the Bible tells you to (in which case you're insane), or you don't, in which case your reasons aren't the same, in which case you're a liar.

I dont reject your god because of your book. i dont reject anything, i disbelieve in your god because i can draw my own conclusions, and your book dosnt let me do that.

[Wash O'Hanley]

Re: REJECTION!

Not two posts ago you said you disbelieve in our God for the same reason we disbelieve in your "god". Now you're telling us the contrary. Cease your lies.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: REJECTION!

I dont reject your god because of your book. i dont reject anything, i disbelieve in your god because i can draw my own conclusions, and your book dosnt let me do that.

We seem to be going over the same point over and over again here. You reject Christ's Sweet Love because "you can draw your own conclusions", we reject false gods because we don't draw our own conclusions, Christ draws them for us. Therefore, we are not acting because of the same reasons, therefore you are a LIAR!

[One-eyed Jack]

Re: REJECTION!

Friends, I think what we have here is a True-Believer Atheist. I don't think IBelieveIKnow has the faintest clue what the logical disproofs of God might be...he just likes the idea of being a "rationalist".

He is not rational, he's just enchanted with the manly mystique of rationalism.

It's sad. Sorrow fills my heart. A good discussion with someone capable of intelligent thought can be stimulating, even if one disagrees with him. But here we have a chap who cannot really say why he hates God, he just writes drivel like "i dunt belive in ur book becawz i dunt beleve in ur buk becase i dunt beliffs in ur bok becuze i donot belif in ur book" over and over.

As a compassionate and gentle man, I am moved nearly to tears, my friends. This, then, is the new True-Believer: a babbling child wallowing in atheism simply because he thinks it's cooler than religion.

Alas. Alas that the philosophical legacy of David Hume, Bertrand Russell, Carl Sagan, and Richard Dawkins should be given witness by children utterly unable to think straight.

Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee? Deuteronomy 32:6

Alas indeed.

~~ OEJ

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: REJECTION!

remind me again how im a liar
??

"As soon as you understand why you disbelieve and rejecty all other gods and religions, you will understand why i disbelieve in yours."

I reject false gods because God tells me to. You said that as soon as we understand why we reject "all other gods" (hint, there are no other gods, just God), we will understand why you reject God. That means you reject God because He told you to. If that isn't the case, if you're rejecting Him for some other reason (and I suspect that reason to be a rebellious nature and self-loathing), then telling us we will understand why you reject God when we understand why we reject false gods is blatantly untrue, which either makes you extraordinarily ignorant or a liar.
If you prefer to be thought of as extraordinarily ignorant instead of a liar, that's your call to make.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: REJECTION!

"As soon as you understand why you disbelieve and rejecty all other gods and religions, you will understand why i disbelieve in yours."

I reject false gods because God tells me to. You said that as soon as we understand why we reject "all other gods" (hint, there are no other gods, just God), we will understand why you reject God. That means you reject God because He told you to. If that isn't the case, if you're rejecting Him for some other reason (and I suspect that reason to be a rebellious nature and self-loathing), then telling us we will understand why you reject God when we understand why we reject false gods is blatantly untrue, which either makes you extraordinarily ignorant or a liar.
If you prefer to be thought of as extraordinarily ignorant instead of a liar, that's your call to make.

people, again your saying i reject, i dont reject, i disbelieve, i explained the differnece. not noticing the difference makes you ignorant,

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: REJECTION!

people, again your saying i reject, i dont reject, i disbelieve, i explained the differnece. not noticing the difference makes you ignorant,

You're the one who put the word "reject" in the original post, even though, to be fair, you didn't use it to describe yourself though. However, you claim to not believe in God, but He is very much real. But claiming to not believe in His actual existence, you are rejecting Him. The thing is, you know God exists. You just choose to acknowledge this.

Romans 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Anyway, back to your original post. Forget about using the word "rejecty" and focus on the word "disbelieve". The argument still stands that I don't believe in other gods because the Lord God told me they are false. If you "disbelieve" in God, and it's not because God told you to not believe in Him, then your original post is still patently false. Again, you are either a liar or extraordinarily ignorant.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: REJECTION!

I particularly like number nine

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: REJECTION!

I particularly like number nine

That's not Biblical at all! Don't go quoting false scriptures around here, or you just might find yourself with a whole heap of infraction points!

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: REJECTION!

i didnt say it was biblical, it righteous.
and whats wrong with any of whats said there?
forget the fact its not directly quoted from the bible, whats wrong with any of that at all?

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: REJECTION!

If it's not of God, it's of the Devil. You really are starting to get tedious.

Edit: Heck, here's some infraction points anyway for being boring and witless.