[Sanity]

Re: Egotistical

EDITOR'S NOTE: Wikipedia cannot be trusted, as 99% of the information that is posted on it is false. -Wash O'Hanley

Can you please give the resource for this figure? The exaggerated figure indicates it to be false.

I made it known that wiki isn't the be all end all of total truth...

The wiki page on Hitler is quite interesting however it must be read with the knowledge of possible bias.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

What is "church candy?"

thats youname, candy
i dont go to church........candy
since my name has been dubed jennifer, yours has been dubed, candy.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Egotistical

LOL, sorry but you left yourself wide-open

Oh no! A pun! I am so hurt. You are the first one. No really.

there is more than one conclusion… Follow that light and get BURNED! I know you’re analogy was to reference biblical terms but my sense of logic and humor took over. Forgive me, no disrespect intended, just a funny.

Yes of course, you can get BURNED too. That's what people who refuse to come to JESUS do! I didn't think that needed to be pointed out.

Pardon me, but perhaps you should have asked him what he meant instead of telling him what he meant because by doing so you have proved him right…

Idiosynchratic is an apt definition of Jennifer's post.

Matthew5:22 (Sermon on the Mount) But I say unto you,… but whosoever shall say, Thou fool. Shall be in danger of hell fire.

No it doesn't. You left out the relevant bit:

But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire

I don't think Jennifer is my "brother", nor is she my "sister".

Umm, I think apologies are in order.

Accepted.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire

but all men are Jesus' brother

[Wide-Open]

Re: Egotistical

but all men are Jesus' brother

What a silly idea.

Through the wrath of the LORD of hosts is the land darkened, and the people shall be as the fuel of the fire: no man shall spare his brother.
Isaiah 9:19

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

What a silly idea.

Through the wrath of the LORD of hosts is the land darkened, and the people shall be as the fuel of the fire: no man shall spare his brother.
Isaiah 9:19

that has nothing to do with it, thats saying that no man shall through his brother into the fire, meaning no man shall betray another man. so im not seeing the relevance here.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Egotistical

The more i look at it, the more i am convinced that no man every worshiped anything but himself. People create their "god" in the image of themselves, and then worship it.

Does that mean that there's a false god in the image of you that you worship? Worst. False. God. Ever. Seriously, even the cow-worshipping Hindaloos have a better deity than you, and that's saying something.

and free thinkers dont persecute, redicles do. free thinkers can see that fighting isnt necessary and can see that hatred is not necessary.

Actually, free thinkers often arrive at different conclusions. That's what makes them (hellbound) free thinkers. Are you claiming that Nietzsche wasn't a free thinker? Or that he was some limp-wristed pansy who was against fighting?

Do you not listen, that pen wasnt properly secured and the tiger was able to get out, der.

Yes, because the homosexuals had deliberately not secured his cage properly as part of their agenda.

Please back up what you say with resources. BTW, it is spelled J E W and…Christians do not HAVE to borrow from them nor are they forced to agree to an interest rate for which they feel is unfair.

Unless the Joo bankers form a Joo monopoly, as they always do. In which case, Christians are forced to borrow from them at an unfair interest rate. Have you ever read the Talmud or the Protocols? It's all in there.

Hitler’s egotistical behavior cost many innocent victims their lives due to the egotistical behavior of some of the Jews.

Did you just blame the Jews for the Holocaust?

Who will Jesus Damn?

Matthew5:22 (Sermon on the Mount) But I say unto you,… but whosoever shall say, Thou fool. Shall be in danger of hell fire.

Umm, I think apologies are in order.

O
No it doesn't. You left out the relevant bit:

But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire

I don't think Jennifer is my "brother", nor is she my "sister".

More importantly, it says "without a cause". Pastor Ezekiel had a perfectly good cause: the fact that the fellow he was addressing was a fool. Therefore, that verse is irrelevant.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

Yes, because the homosexuals had deliberately not secured his cage properly as part of their agenda.

were you there, did you seem that happen for youself?
i think not, spo how the hell can you say thats what happened?
i have seen pictures of the pen. the mote was too short and the fence not tall enough, the tiger jumped the too short mote and climbed the not-tall-enough fence. thats what is plainly obvious from pictures.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Egotistical

were you there, did you seem that happen for youself?
i think not, spo how the hell can you say thats what happened?
i have seen pictures of the pen. the mote was too short and the fence not tall enough, the tiger jumped the too short mote and climbed the not-tall-enough fence. thats what is plainly obvious from pictures.

Why would someone keep a tiger in a pen with a moat that wasn't big enough? Why would someone keep a tiger in a pen with a fence that wasn't tall enough? Because they were a vicious queer with a grudge against Christ, that's why.

[Sanity]

Re: Egotistical

Mr. Wide-Open,
I did not comment to “hurt your feelings”.
My comment was to reflect the fact that there was more than one conclusion a mind could come to… as you neglected to consider in your statement.

I don't think Jennifer is my "brother", nor is she my "sister".

Then let’s read what is commanded of you in reference to your enemies…

Matthew5:43 (Sermon on the Mount) Ye have heard that it hath been said, thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not the publicans the same?
47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

So quick to take/imagine an apology but so stubborn in the giving of it? Yes, the more you speak the more the word egotistical fits you.

Matt.6:14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Mr. Brother Temperance,
You are entitled to you opinions and when you post them without regard to facts to back them up then it is a reflection of ignorance.

IbeleiveIknowwhat?,
I do not know what your mission is in this place but from what I have observed in my short visit here is that this is not a place to find help in understanding Christ. They have memorized but have little understanding. They have just enough understanding to build up their egos to serve themselves and your time, in my opinion, would be more fruitful elsewhere. The truth is not in this pudding.

It is not my desire to be against Christ or His word, but against the Hypocrites who claim it for their own glory.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

The user name i created was 'i believe what i know"
but they trued to keep me out and changed it several times.
my point here is to prove them that there are putting words in jesus' mouth, and mixing up his real meanings.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Egotistical

The user name i created was 'i believe what i know"
but they trued to keep me out and changed it several times.
my point here is to prove them that there are putting words in jesus' mouth, and mixing up his real meanings.

Here is a challenge for you then. Find one post where we quote false scripture. Bear in mind that we use the one true Bible, the King James 1611, so finding differences in wording because you used a false translation don't count.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

nononono, what you do is take the real words and put false meanings to them.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Egotistical

nononono, what you do is take the real words and put false meanings to them.

You're confusing us with LIEberals. "Gay" used to mean happy and joyful, but look how the sodomites ruined that perfectly good word. Or how "progressive" used to mean going forward, but the loony left co-opted it to mean "believing in proven to fail socialist concepts".
It's the hippy-dippy feelgood "churches" who treat the Bible like a salad bar, picking and choosing what they like or don't like. We treat it like a full meal deal, and we happily and hungrily swallow every delicious bite.

[IbelieveIknowwhat?]

Re: Egotistical

you take thou shall not kill
and make it thou shall not kill anyone like thyself
when the real meaning is that no one should kill anyone ever.