[Roonil Wazlib]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Wait, what? I am really trying to see what part of my post even slightly hinted at my sexuality. I'll try not to judge you the way you've judged me, but I'll let you know that it's really hard to be respectful when people talk to you that way. I never called you stupid. I never called you a "homer". I never said anything disrespectful. And here you are flaming me.


wat

[Pure_Angel]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Wait, what? I am really trying to see what part of my post even slightly hinted at my sexuality. I'll try not to judge you the way you've judged me, but I'll let you know that it's really hard to be respectful when people talk to you that way. I never called you stupid. I never called you a "homer". I never said anything disrespectful. And here you are flaming me.


wat

You posted a picture with a rainbow (in "space") and you "know" alot about AIDS, so clearly you have AIDS and is a homer.

(Will I get AIDS for responding to him? Oh my, I hope not! )

YIC
Elisabeth

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

flaming me

Oh that's nice! Really nice! Just rub your AIDS in our faces.

Yes, we get it that you are flaming gaysexual and not in a good way, as in gaysexual actually being on fire. Like they will be in hell.

[Roonil Wazlib]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Oh that's nice! Really nice! Just rub your AIDS in our faces.

Yes, we get it that you are flaming gaysexual and not in a good way, as in gaysexual actually being on fire. Like they will be in hell.

That is not even slightly what I meant at all.

Verb

flame (third-person singular simple present flames, present participle flaming, simple past and past participle flamed)

1. To produce flames.
2. (Internet) To post a destructively critical or abusive message, especially to provoke dissent or controversy

Welcome to the Internet.

[Roonil Wazlib]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

You posted a picture with a rainbow (in "space") and you "know" alot about AIDS, so clearly you have AIDS and is a homer.

(Will I get AIDS for responding to him? Oh my, I hope not! )

YIC
Elisabeth

Sorry for double posting, but I only just noticed this post, and I evidently can't edit my own posts.

Since when are rainbows made up of three colors? Just because something has a rainbow doesn't automatically make it gay, especially when it isn't a rainbow at all. Besides, it was a joke. Explaining a joke always ruins it, but I guess I'll have to. In the early 90's or so, NBC broadcast public service announcements, clearing up common misconceptions, which ended with a thing saying "The More You Know".

And what I learned about AIDS I learned from research from unbiased sources, which seems to be more than you've done.

[Teabagging Mom]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

That is not even slightly what I meant at all.

Verb

flame (third-person singular simple present flames, present participle flaming, simple past and past participle flamed)

1. To produce flames.
2. (Internet) To post a destructively critical or abusive message, especially to provoke dissent or controversy

Welcome to the Internet.

Well Mr. Wazlib, when my Biblically divorced husband ran off with that she-male, I washed all of his clothes in 100% clorox. Talk about smelly! but there wasn't anything controversial about it -- I didn't want his stupidness to spread to my kids. Are you going to flame me now, because I did what needed to be done to keep my kids healthy?

[Roonil Wazlib]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Well Mr. Wazlib, when my Biblically divorced husband ran off with that she-male, I washed all of his clothes in 100% clorox. Talk about smelly! but there wasn't anything controversial about it -- I didn't want his stupidness to spread to my kids. Are you going to flame me now, because I did what needed to be done to keep my kids healthy?

No, I haven't flamed anyone here, and I don't plan to, as satisfying as it would be. Leaving you for anyone else was absolutely a terrible thing to do, no matter who he left you with, be it male, female, or somewhere in between, especially leaving you alone to raise your children. No one deserves that, unless they tortured their spouse or something.

[Teabagging Mom]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

No, I haven't flamed anyone here, and I don't plan to, as satisfying as it would be. Leaving you for anyone else was absolutely a terrible thing to do, no matter who he left you with, be it male, female, or somewhere in between, especially leaving you alone to raise your children. No one deserves that, unless they tortured their spouse or something.

I see you're the serious type. I'll bet you did good in school. Everyone I know who's like you is boring to be with and sort of makes you want to scream or choke yourself when they're around. Maybe you're different. Are you Christian?

[Pure_Angel]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Sorry for double posting, but I only just noticed this post, and I evidently can't edit my own posts.

Since when are rainbows made up of three colors? Just because something has a rainbow doesn't automatically make it gay, especially when it isn't a rainbow at all. Besides, it was a joke. Explaining a joke always ruins it, but I guess I'll have to. In the early 90's or so, NBC broadcast public service announcements, clearing up common misconceptions, which ended with a thing saying "The More You Know".

And what I learned about AIDS I learned from research from unbiased sources, which seems to be more than you've done.

I am so sorry, but if my eyes serves me right I see more than three colors, namely yellow, orange, red, purple, dark- and light blue and green. That is seven colors.

I don't understand that joke. Why would it be funny to put a picture showing a rainbow, a star and the text "The More You Know" on it, under a misinformative text? I don't see it.

I have been taught everything about AIDS from this forum, and I am still not sure if its okay to respond to you, since you might be a homer. (I don't want to get AIDS!)

YIC,
Elisabeth

[Roonil Wazlib]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

I am so sorry, but if my eyes serves me right I see more than three colors, namely yellow, orange, red, purple, dark- and light blue and green. That is seven colors.

I don't understand that joke. Why would it be funny to put a picture showing a rainbow, a star and the text "The More You Know" on it, under a misinformative text? I don't see it.

I have been taught everything about AIDS from this forum, and I am still not sure if its okay to respond to you, since you might be a homer. (I don't want to get AIDS!)

YIC,
Elisabeth

Okay, well, not a joke, joke wasn't the best word, more like a reference that apparently no one got.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3rhQc666Sg

Do you really think this forum is the best place to get an unbiased opinion about anything? You really need to open your mind a little more. No single source of information can be right about everything, whether it's a Christian source or not. And I really can't tell if you're joking about whether or not you think you could get AIDS from me over the internet, particularly considering I don't have it. It's hard to tell when people are joking over text.

And Teabagging Mom, I was raised Roman Catholic. Not sure what you'd make of that.

[James Hutchins]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Why must you thrust Godless homers at us? You do know the Bible states it is wrong.
Lev.18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Lev.20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Rom.1:26-27 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

[Roonil Wazlib]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

Why must you thrust Godless homers at us? You do know the Bible states it is wrong.
Lev.18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Lev.20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Rom.1:26-27 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

I would really appreciate it if you didn't put words into my mouth, thank you.

[a fuzzy sloth]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

I'm fully aware that biology is a great evil because it speaks of the cursed cells that comprise us all, but in order to abominate all known bacteria and viruses, the appropriate temperature is 165 degrees Fahrenheit.

[wait_what]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

I'm fully aware that biology is a great evil because it speaks of the cursed cells that comprise us all, but in order to abominate all known bacteria and viruses, the appropriate temperature is 165 degrees Fahrenheit.

What about hyperthermophiles? Specifically Geogemma Barossi?

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: What's better, hot or cold for removing gay germs?

gamma irradiation sounds promising

effluent
Swine vesicular disease
vesicular stomatitis
blue-tongue virus
Pseudorabies
fowl plague

swine vesicular disease (again! they seem to like this one - or is there a hidden agaeda?) and vesicular stomatitis virus (oooh! another fave rave in the AIDS LAB?) were irradiated in liquid animal feces

“The D10 values, that is, the doses required to reduce infectivity by 1 log10, were not apparently different from those expected from predictions based on other data and theoretical considerations. The existence of the viruses in pieces of tissue or in liquid feces made no difference in the efficacy of the gamma radiation for inactivating them. Under the "worst case" conditions (most protective for virus) simulated in this study, no infectious agents would survive 4.0 Mrads.”