X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pastor Nereu Gargalo
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    The man's a fool. When not playing with Lego he comes here with his ignorance of scripture coupled to his arrogant nature. A recipe for disaster and failure.

    It's really very simple.

    1 John 5:7, For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

    Amen.

    Leave a comment:


  • JustGotSaved
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    So nice,
    But will you kill us if we dont? May our children live too? Yes? Oooh, thank you!

    How do you feel about forced conversions? About Beheading? About Daniel Pearl? About 9-11? About all the atrocities you cavemen do? Please answer.

    Islam only grew by the SWORD. Now you fanatics have nukes. You should all be denuked, real fast. The only reason we sold you beads and trinkets and explained plumbing to you was becuase of your oil. Although we're stupidly buying it now and making your corrupt leaders rich, at least we'll suck you dry before we use up our own. Have fun being meaningful when you have nothing left to offer us. We'll never respect you. You'll always be just a sand-n* in a suit.

    Leave a comment:


  • TruePath
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    HAHAHAHAHA
    So the KJV 1611 is your scripture?

    Let me take a wild guess, it was written in.... 1611?

    My friend, scripture is written when it is given to the prophet Allah has chosen. The Gospel given to Jesus (pbuh) has been twisted so much and had these "letters" from "Paul" (who is *NOT* a prophet) to it and what you have, written 1600 years AFTER Jesus'(pbuh) time, this is *NOT* scripture.

    Thsi is why Allah has sent The Greatest Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) and the Noble Qu'ran to correct you people and save you from hellfire. What a loving God we serve!

    I invite you all peacefully to convert to Islam. Insha'Allah you will accept.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mistress Cookie
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by TruePath View Post
    It is the Revised Standard Version, 1974 edition.
    God's™ Word does not need to be revised. It is an eternal truth for the ages.

    We are not revisionists. God(tm) is the one who had the vision.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheLordSavedMe
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by TruePath View Post
    Hang on a minute, that verse is in dispute is it not? The RSV doesn't even have it I think.
    So what if a false Bible leaves out a verse? That's what makes it a false Bible you doofus! The KJV 1611 is The One True Bible™.

    Tammi

    ps-- Are you stinky? The Muslim guys that come into the Pita Pit usually smell like BO. Is that part of the Muslim Bible or something, to be smelly?



    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by TruePath View Post
    It is the Revised Standard Version, 1974 edition.
    Are you serious!? No wonder you're a damned mudslime! I would be too if I read that false Bible!!

    Leave a comment:


  • TruePath
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire View Post
    Probably "The Red Sea Version"...
    It is the Revised Standard Version, 1974 edition.

    Because thats how often you infidels alter your "scriptures".

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Probably "The Red Sea Version"...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hank
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by TruePath View Post
    Hang on a minute, that verse is in dispute is it not? The RSV doesn't even have it I think.
    Whats an RSV buddy? We only use the Authorized KJV 1611 here.

    Leave a comment:


  • TruePath
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by Larry Lee View Post
    I John 5:7: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."
    Hang on a minute, that verse is in dispute is it not? The RSV doesn't even have it I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Larry Lee
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by Samuel Coleridge View Post
    While my beliefs are firmly rooted in the Word of Jesus Christ, I have always been a bit wary of John.

    As we all know, it is the youngest Gospel of the Bible. It is the first to introduce the idea of an eternal Jesus in John 1 and the trinity in John 10.
    I have always relied more heavily on the synoptics, i.e.

    Matthew 24:36

    But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.


    Mark 13:32

    But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.

    Though it would seem those verses would contradict against the aforementioned

    John 1:30
    I and my Father are one.

    I will err on the side of the canonical John over the much older Mark or Matthew. I believe, I have shown Truepath to be the idiot here!

    Yours in triumph over the heretical Muslim,
    Sam
    Canonical is as canonical does, Mr. Coleridge, which is to say I'm deeply troubled by your apparent assertion that some scripture is better than other scripture. Only a God-hating false Christian could think such a thing.

    Regardless, I want to put this whole matter of the Trinity to rest by quoting from God Himself, who said in I John 5:7: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

    Leave a comment:


  • Samuel Coleridge
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    While my beliefs are firmly rooted in the Word of Jesus Christ, I have always been a bit wary of John.

    As we all know, it is the youngest Gospel of the Bible. It is the first to introduce the idea of an eternal Jesus in John 1 and the trinity in John 10.
    I have always relied more heavily on the synoptics, i.e.

    Matthew 24:36

    But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.


    Mark 13:32

    But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.

    Though it would seem those verses would contradict against the aforementioned

    John 1:30
    I and my Father are one.

    I will err on the side of the canonical John over the much older Mark or Matthew. I believe, I have shown Truepath to be the idiot here!

    Yours in triumph over the heretical Muslim,
    Sam

    Leave a comment:


  • Levi Jones
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by Larry Lee View Post
    Brother Prune, I'm afraid Muhammad fell under the spell of the "infancy Gospels" and didn't spend enough time with the canonical Gospel of John. Muhammad succumbed to Satan's deceptions, which is abundantly clear from his Quranic scribblings. But, what else could we expect from a spawn of Ishmael?
    Amen Brother Larry, how can we forget how the foolish Ishmael was cleverly tricked out of his birthright? There's a synonym I'm thinking of for "cleverly tricked". It's not popping up in my head at the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marshall
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    The same reason you call scribbles and dots a written language or the hawking of loogies a word. There is a lonely goat somewhere with your name on it, seek it and do what thou wilt. It's what Mohammed would have done.

    Leave a comment:


  • TruePath
    replied
    Re: The Trinity..?

    Originally posted by Bryan Tamariki View Post
    I prefer to worship God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.
    Even your own Bible says there is only one God, so why do you insist on worshipping three? It is polytheism and God hates that.

    verily your place is hell.

    Leave a comment:

Working...