[Brother V]

Re: Breast Feeding

Amen Sister!!

Can you imagine this harlot trying to breas feed her baby. She would SQUASH him.

What kind of heathen drives an orange car?

[Old Man Hatchet]

Re: Breast Feeding

My youngest daughter, Godless strumpet that she is, breast feeds her children. She thrust a medical journal at me the other day that states breast milk helps to lower the infant's risk of diabetes, diarrhea, asthma, allergies, ear infections, and obesity.

Friends, this is utter poppycock, but even if it were true, which would you rather your child be: a fat, diabetic, asthmatic or a perverted, nipple-sucking fiend? I think obesity, diabetes, and asthma are a small price to pay for salvation.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Breast Feeding

Ok, my bad. GrammAr. At least I know how to admit when I'm wrong.

Every single post?

I most certainly have not seen "the pictorial." Young lady, I do not view trash magazines like Playboy. I burn them. I even find many so-called Christian magazines offensive and in league with Satan.

Good Lord that magazine is truly offensive and terrifying. Which one is the parent and which is the child? Or are we supposed to accept that they're both parents?

No. I am far too modest. I let others make that comparison.

You know who you remind me of? ...No, nevermind.

My husband is a real man. Only a coward would beat a woman.

That makes no sense at all. Only a coward would refrain from beating a woman. How does running away from physical confrontation make you brave?

And if your god encourages beating of a woman, I will surely not be studying your version of Christianity.

Why do celebrate ignorance? Why are you so afraid of knowledge?

[St. John Rivers]

Re: Breast Feeding

Actually, ihatehypocrites is correct. Men are not supposed to beat women. Beating their wives make men bitter, and that bitterness fosters hate in women. Unless you are saying your wives are masochists, at which point you admit you beat them for sexual pleasure. And let's not forget that beating wives, or husbands, or children, or anybody, in fact, is punishable by law, the same law put in place by Christian people from long ago.

And breastfeeding is not sinful. In fact, it's completely natural. Why do women have them? To feed children when nothing else is there. Why would God give women something that is only there to show just how sinful they are? If breastfeeding is sinful, then so is drinking milk from a cow's udders. And let's not forget, men have nipples too. Before birth, the fetus grows the parts that would be necessary regardless of gender. Lungs, eyes, the heart, the brain, even breasts. The male breast isn't as large as the female's simply because the men doesn't grow mammory glands.

So if the nipples that some women use for breastfeeding is just a sin of their sin, then you're admitting you are sinful as well, before you even leave the womb. But that can't be. If so, then you must've sinned before, which is impossible unless you've lived past lives, which any True Christian, trademarked or not, would realize is not true.

And you may not want to completely rag on the Catholic Church. If it wasn't for the Catholics, we wouldn't be here, nor would you. Or worse, we'd be sinners and not know it, according to your interpretation of God's Holy Word.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Breast Feeding

Actually, ihatehypocrites is correct. Men are not supposed to beat women. Beating their wives make men bitter, and that bitterness fosters hate in women. Unless you are saying your wives are masochists, at which point you admit you beat them for sexual pleasure. And let's not forget that beating wives, or husbands, or children, or anybody, in fact, is punishable by law, the same law put in place by Christian people from long ago.

And breastfeeding is not sinful. In fact, it's completely natural. Why do women have them? To feed children when nothing else is there. Why would God give women something that is only there to show just how sinful they are? If breastfeeding is sinful, then so is drinking milk from a cow's udders. And let's not forget, men have nipples too. Before birth, the fetus grows the parts that would be necessary regardless of gender. Lungs, eyes, the heart, the brain, even breasts. The male breast isn't as large as the female's simply because the men doesn't grow mammory glands.

So if the nipples that some women use for breastfeeding is just a sin of their sin, then you're admitting you are sinful as well, before you even leave the womb. But that can't be. If so, then you must've sinned before, which is impossible unless you've lived past lives, which any True Christian, trademarked or not, would realize is not true.

yada yada yada..
Do you have any scripture to support anything you say or are you only talking out your sinning ass?

That's what's wrong with you atheists, you think all opinon is equal..
(Except for our Christian opinion, that is.)
But it's not like that, there is truth (the Holy Bible) and there is false claims and lies. ("Humanism" and 'science'.)

And you may not want to completely rag on the Catholic Church. If it wasn't for the Catholics, we wouldn't be here, nor would you. Or worse, we'd be sinners and not know it, according to your interpretation of God's Holy Word.

Fool, God has promised to preserve His Holy Word, and needs no cathylicks to do it.
Infact, the cathylicks banned their followers from owning Bibles as late as the 1800's!
If you don't know what you're talking about, next time, shut your pie-hole.


BTW your name is very blashpemous..
You don't make yourself a saint, God makes one a saint.

[St. John Rivers]

Re: Breast Feeding

I know. I just figured adding that to prefix to my name may let me in quicker.

And yes, I do have the Scripture to prove it. Read through Genesis. You'll see what I mean. Science only helps us to understand our bodies and the animals we share Earth with. I know God created us. And I know he made us in his image. And I know he didn't mess up.

Unless you're saying God made a mistake when he gave women nipples. At which point, you're saying God isn't perfect. And isn't that blasphemy?

Oh, one more thing this post. God didn't give use baby bottles. He gave us the knowledge to make plastics, which lead to the idea of baby bottles, which were made for people who are truly ashamed of their bodies, which is where Adam and Eve disappointed God directly after Eve ate the Forbidden Fruit.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Breast Feeding

I know. I just figured adding that to prefix to my name may let me in quicker.

So you're a sneaky little liar then?
Great way to start off on the right foot here, heathen..

And yes, I do have the Scripture to prove it. Read through Genesis. You'll see what I mean. Science only helps us to understand our bodies and the animals we share Earth with. I know God created us. And I know he made us in his image. And I know he didn't mess up.

Friend, I've read through the entire Bible, several times.
Don't patronize me, thank you. I'm a Theologian.

And I wasn't talking about nipples, stop this obsession..
But this talk about it being impossible to have sinned before you left the womb.
Are you one of those FALSE so-called Christians who believe all babies and unborn go to Heaven by default?

The wicked are estranged from the womb:
They go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.
Psalm 58:3

Babies are sinful, since they haven't yet accepted Jesus.
So it's not a good idea to have them engage in acts that their filthy minds interpret as sexual in nature..
(Ie breastfeeding)

Unless you're saying God made a mistake when he gave women nipples. At which point, you're saying God isn't perfect. And isn't that blasphemy?

I wasn't. Stop building straw-men.

Oh, one more thing this post. God didn't give use baby bottles. He gave us the knowledge to make plastics, which lead to the idea of baby bottles, which were made for people who are truly ashamed of their bodies, which is where Adam and Eve disappointed God directly after Eve ate the Forbidden Fruit.

So how do you know God didn't also give us the knowledge to make baby-bottles?
You may speak as if you had the authority of a prophet, but your words are still a fool's words.

[St. John Rivers]

Re: Breast Feeding

Your message simply tells me that you're afraid of nature, which, by the way (BTW for those of you who can't read or type proper English), is God's creation without human taint. God intended us to rely on ourselves, which included feeding infants from the breasts of women. Otherwise, we wouldn't exist because Adam and Eve would've let their children die.

It's interesting. You think God wanted us to stay away from our mothers. I was fed on a bottle, because my mother didn't 'people' like you to chastise her for using her body as God designed it to be used, to allow her baby to survive.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Breast Feeding

Your message simply tells me that you're afraid of nature, which, by the way (BTW for those of you who can't read or type proper English), is God's creation without human taint. God intended us to rely on ourselves, which included feeding infants from the breasts of women. Otherwise, we wouldn't exist because Adam and Eve would've let their children die.

I'm not afraid of nature, but you're afraid of God... To trust in God with your whole heart, and not rely on your own "understanding".

BTW Adam and Eve only had children AFTER their fall.
They were already tainted by sin by then, so you got no case here.

Also we (as in humans) still rely on ourselves when babies feed from a bottle..
Cause man is the one who builds and operates these bottles.
Using the "logic" in your argument, it'd be wrong to use clothes, computers, cars etc etc..
But then, I don't expect you atheists to make much sense.

It's interesting. You think God wanted us to stay away from our mothers. I was fed on a bottle, because my mother didn't 'people' like you to chastise her for using her body as God designed it to be used, to allow her baby to survive.

And look how you turned out, a homosexual.
Just as we said you would, so I rest my case.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: Breast Feeding

God's creation without human taint.

Human's have taints! Males and females!

Why are you here? Are you trying to persecute us and mock us?

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: Breast Feeding

I know. I just figured adding that to prefix to my name may let me in quicker.

And yes, I do have the Scripture to prove it. Read through Genesis. You'll see what I mean. Science only helps us to understand our bodies and the animals we share Earth with. I know God created us. And I know he made us in his image. And I know he didn't mess up.

Unless you're saying God made a mistake when he gave women nipples. At which point, you're saying God isn't perfect. And isn't that blasphemy?

Oh, one more thing this post. God didn't give use baby bottles. He gave us the knowledge to make plastics, which lead to the idea of baby bottles, which were made for people who are truly ashamed of their bodies, which is where Adam and Eve disappointed God directly after Eve ate the Forbidden Fruit.

Apparently you need a few Genesis lessons yourself......like Genesis 7:2 where it describes women as being the property of men.... as well as lessons about the Catholic church. But I haven't the time right now and that's why we have morning Bible study. However, I can see you have fallen into some of the heretic traps GOD put in the Bible to catch out people who pick and choose what they want to read and simply ignore the rest. One example:

GOD speaks to Adam in Genesis 2:17 "But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."

So you answer this for me: How long did Adam live after he ateth thereof?

As to the Catholic Church, they just came out of the closet and said that the entire story of Creation in Genesis is "A kind of Paganism" and not true.

So shut up about Catlicks.

[St. John Rivers]

Re: Breast Feeding

the entire story of Creation in Genesis is "A kind of Paganism" and not true.

So you're saying the word of God is false in parts? If the story of Creation in Genesis is a kind of Paganism, are you calling Christianity Pagan?

Or are you saying that you doubt the divinely inspired Bible is fictional?

If you want to scold me about how my beliefs and test from God are wrong, at least stick to one train of thought.

How can anyone call themselves True Christians if they believe the Bible itself is false?

And worse, how can you dare to coin the terms Christian and God's Word? That says that no one but yourselves can become Christian.

[Brother V]

Re: Breast Feeding

So you're saying the word of God is false in parts? If the story of Creation in Genesis is a kind of Paganism, are you calling Christianity Pagan?

Or are you saying that you doubt the divinely inspired Bible is fictional?

If you want to scold me about how my beliefs and test from God are wrong, at least stick to one train of thought.

How can anyone call themselves True Christians if they believe the Bible itself is false?

And worse, how can you dare to coin the terms Christian and God's Word? That says that no one but yourselves can become Christian.

Exactly... except you are claiming Pastor Pistle said the story of Genesis was false, when he was quoting the cathylicks as saying that.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Breast Feeding

Human's have taints! Males and females!

Why are you here? Are you trying to persecute us and mock us?

I was wondering about that too. Are Mr. "Saint's" choo-choo and poo-hole... in the exact same place? All smushed up together?

No wonder he turned out queer!

[Seeker]

Re: Breast Feeding

Dudes, nipples were made for men(they don't even have to be godly) and Enfamil and Similac was made for babies. Yes indeed! Won't hear me complain on this.