[MirthMenace]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

BigJay, see Genesis for an explanation of why God DOES want you neatly trimmed...

17:7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
17:8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God. (17:8) "An everlasting possession"
God gives Abraham and his descendants all the land of Canaan "for an everlasting possession." This promise has inspired much of the unending strife and intolerance in the Middle East region, and it continues to do so today. Yet history and the Bible (Acts 7:5, Heb.11:13) show that this promise was not kept. 17:9 And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations. 17:10 This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. (17:7, 10-11, 13, 19)
"Ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin."
God establishes his covenant with Abram: "This is my covenant ... every man child among you shall be circumcised. And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin."
Is circumcision required? (17:12-13, 23, 27)
"He that is bought with thy money"
Does God approve of slavery?
17:11 And ye shallcircumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you. 17:12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed. 17:13 He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. 17:14 And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.

[TinyJay]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

Then why are the rest of the people on this forum afraid to get the tallywacker trimmed ? If I were them I would be more afraid to eat pigs and shrimp Lev.11....
That seems to be a problem they all seem to stray from.

[MirthMenace]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

Then why are the rest of the people on this forum afraid to get the tallywacker trimmed ? If I were them I would be more afraid to eat pigs and shrimp Lev.11....
That seems to be a problem they all seem to stray from.

I'm always amused by "cafeteria Christians" who look at their Bible as an "ala carte" menu from which they can choose the tastiest parts that appeal to them most while taking a pass on the gristly bits that are hard to force down. Mormons come from a line who, because they weren't quite satisfied with the Bible menu, created their own addendum from which they can choose the tastiest parts that appeal to them most while taking a pass on the gristly bits that are hard to force down.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

Then why are the rest of the people on this forum afraid to get the tallywacker trimmed ? If I were them I would be more afraid to eat pigs and shrimp Lev.11....
That seems to be a problem they all seem to stray from.

You're very confused. You said earlier your foreskin is yours. False, it is not. God required men to cut off their foreskins (and occasionally ordered to remove other people's foreskins by force) and offer it to Him as a sign that they belonged to Him before the crucifixion. Afterwards, He told everyone they not to do this, and in facts, says anyone still holding onto the tradition of circumcision was evil.

Galatians 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing

Colossians 2:10-12 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power: In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

Now, why don't you know what the Bible says for yourself? Oh right, you're a mor(m)on

And as a matter of fact, we don't eat disgusting shellfish: http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showt...ight=shellfish

You know what other Biblical command we keep? The one about NOT ADDING TO THE WORD OF GOD!

[MirthMenace]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

You're very confused. You said earlier your foreskin is yours. False, it is not. God required men to cut off their foreskins (and occasionally ordered to remove other people's foreskins by force) and offer it to Him as a sign that they belonged to Him before the crucifixion. Afterwards, He told everyone they not to do this, and in facts, says anyone still holding onto the tradition of circumcision was evil.

Galatians 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing

Colossians 2:10-12 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power: In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

Now, why don't you know what the Bible says for yourself? Oh right, you're a mor(m)on

And as a matter of fact, we don't eat disgusting shellfish: http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showt...ight=shellfish

You know what other Biblical command we keep? The one about NOT ADDING TO THE WORD OF GOD!

WOW, BigJay, that's gotta smart! To trim or not to trim.......that is the question. Heathen_Basher makes a compelling argument to Bible adherents. I guess then that the real question is what LBC's official take is on those who came out of their infancy -- through no fault of their own -- without the now-requisite aforementioned part.

[TinyJay]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

I am for trimming being an Old testament kind of guy

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

WOW, BigJay, that's gotta smart! To trim or not to trim.......that is the question. Heathen_Basher makes a compelling argument to Bible adherents. I guess then that the real question is what LBC's official take is on those who came out of their infancy -- through no fault of their own -- without the now-requisite aforementioned part.

Foreskin restoration has become an honorable tradition and information is summarized on this link:

http://www.cirp.org/pages/restore.html

[TinyJay]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

wow thanks for the insight,I was unaware of a peterectomy

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

I am for trimming being an Old testament kind of guy

So you prefer to reject Jesus' offer of salvation?

[TinyJay]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

or is it a addadicktome ?

[TinyJay]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

no not at all I have accepted the salvation of my Lord Jesus,I also accept all of the good book .Even the unpleasant parts

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

no not at all I have accepted the salvation of my Lord Jesus,I also accept all of the good book .Even the unpleasant parts

Not if you're a damned mormon you haven't. You people are about as "saved" as a flock of Hare Krishnas.

[TinyJay]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

question If I have been Baptised and have accepted Jesus how can I be unsaved trash ?Or is it that I belong to the wrong church that has your panties in a bunch?

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

The New Testament explains that the rules for circumcision no longer apply.

http://www.circumstitions.com/Xy.html

http://www.circumstitions.com/leo.html

http://www.lookinguntojesus.net/ata20031207.htm

In fact, if you support circumcision, you are the one picking and choosing what the Bible says instead of looking at all of it.

[MirthMenace]

Re: Republicans fight to save our penises!

I am for trimming being an Old testament kind of guy

I am also for being trimmed, but entirely because I was, as a helpless and unwitting infant, thus altered and want no part of any sort of "restorative" measures that may or may not be made available.

Well, there it is, out in the open. I am a circumcised, non-Christian, pagan Deist. Heathen_Basher called me an "atheist" in his private message to me explaining my receipt of 40 demerits (my penalty for accurately citing Bible verses). That the definition of an atheist eludes Heathen_Basher is unfortunate, especially for someone endowed with the power to penalize forum participants.

But we pagan Deists are a forgiving lot and I have already forgiven Heathen_Basher for erroneously doling out demerits. Come 'ere, Heathen_Basher, ya big lug; lemme give you a big pagan hug!