[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

Says the one who never even attended a Gothparty

You hateful little queer. I don't need to eat poop to know it's bad for me.

Apparently you weren't around when God handed out the common sense.

[snottyduck]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

You hateful little queer. I don't need to eat poop to know it's bad for me.

Apparently you weren't around when God handed out the common sense.

The ugly truth is that you my dear Pastor pointed out the faith of the 5 boys as your signature stated:

Who will Jesus damn?? Murderers (Romans 1:29).

however you put it, they have taken a human live and are therefor murderers. They will have to serve their time and later on they will carry around the guilt they feel for taking a life away. After they die they will be on the highway of hell.

[snottyduck]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

Killing a witch is NOT considered murder, it is doing an important service for God. God commands we kill all witches, and those kids obeyed!

'Murder' is an act of killing that is not righteous. Killing a witch IS a righteous smiting, as it is doing as God COMMANDS!

Exodus 22:18 - "Suffer not a witch to live."

And how exactly do you define a witch?? There is no definition in the Bible that states what a witch exactly is or even how to define it. So, it's for us mortals impossible to define who is really a witch.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

And how exactly do you define a witch?? There is no definition in the Bible that states what a witch exactly is or even how to define it. So, it's for us mortals impossible to define who is really a witch.

I know one when I see one.

Leviticus 20:27
A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.

[snottyduck]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

I know one when I see one.

Leviticus 20:27
A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.

That kind of judgment was not even used in the Middle-Ages!! In the Middle-Ages they used several tests to see if one was a witch, and even how ridiculous these test were back then it was still better than someone who claims that he knows one when he sees one.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

That kind of judgment was not even used in the Middle-Ages!! In the Middle-Ages they used several tests to see if one was a witch, and even how ridiculous these test were back then it was still better than someone who claims that he knows one when he sees one.

Are you calling me ridiculous, pal?

[snottyduck]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

Are you calling me ridiculous, pal?

I only say that we cannot judge who is a witch or not, history proved that way to many times already. The only one who can judge is the Lord himself.

[Don the Baptist]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

The ugly truth is that you my dear Pastor pointed out the faith of the 5 boys as your signature stated:

Who will Jesus damn?? Murderers (Romans 1:29).

however you put it, they have taken a human live and are therefor murderers. They will have to serve their time and later on they will carry around the guilt they feel for taking a life away. After they die they will be on the highway of hell.

We all agree with that verse Snot, however the correct verse to quote in this situation is:


Exodus 22.18 - Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.


See, friend? God meant for that Goth tard Witch to die, He said it Himself and we are obliged to follow the Bible (KJV Only). The fact that Goth tards are witches and are wont to have anal sex, oral sex and eat human excrement is well established, everyone knows it...

[revrggreen]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

I only say that we cannot judge who is a witch or not, history proved that way to many times already. The only one who can judge is the Lord himself.

Does the Bible teach us not to judge? Yes... However, you probably don't understand what that means.

It means not to judge unrighteously, it means not to judge using your human judgment, and it means not to judge hypocritically. In other words, don't substitute your judgment for God's, and don't judge other people when you are guilty of impenitently engaging in the same sins (i.e., Don't cast the first stone).

However, there are several verses in the Bible where we are told to judge.

"Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment" John 7:24.

"But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man" I Corinthians 2:15.

"Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?" I Corinthians 6:2.

Many Goths take the first verse mentioned here as an excuse for me not to judge or preach to them, however they do not understand what this means either. By saying "Judge not according to appearance", this verse is teaching not to pass judgement on someone who is deprived or underprivileged. It is saying not to think you are better than someone else just because they cannot afford to dress or live as well as you. It is in no way telling you not to judge someone for dressing like a freak in whorish Goth clothing, fishnet and PVC, because the Bible teaches that dressing in a perverse and depraved sexual manner is a direct offence to God.

NOW, regarding these kids. We WILL have them freed, under something I like to call 'Goth's Law', Something sadly overlooked in this case.

We used this Law to have Luke Mitchell jailed in 2005 for the murder of Jodi Jones - even though there was NO evidence against him. I took a role in telling the prosecution and Police what to look for in that case. ie. Any Marilyn Manson CDs, did he smoke cannabis which makes people violent, did he write Nirvana lyrics in his school books. Anything that made him look Satanic, as this was probably a Satanic murder case. By showing what CDs he owned, and gothic song lyrics on his school books, we were able to have him imprisoned merely on how he looked, and the music he listened to. Who needs hard evidence when there are goths involved!

The same happened to Damian Echols 15 years ago, and he's STILL in prison. We used this case as a blue-print on how to convict Mitchell with no evidence, and we WILL do the same to Nancy. We will show what kind of girl she REALLY was, and use the music she was into to show she was Satanic, and a worthless human being.

These people are satanists, they don't deserve rights. By showing just what kind of freaks they are, we are confident we can have a goth jailed for ANY crime, even if there is more evidence pointing towards someone else (Like in the Mitchell case), the Police will completely discard this in favor of jailing the gothic freak with no evidence at all. Because they are a Goth, and in league with Lucifer. It is OBVIOUS they are guilty.

Rev RG Green

[InYourDreams]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

If you say that that is what a Goth is, and "everyone" knows it, why is there no definition in any published dictionary listing those "qualities" as fact? In every dictionary in the world a Goth is defined as one of 3 things:
A style of rock music, noted especially for somber or ethereal tones and lugubrious lyrics. (listener of this type of music)
Of the Teutonic people who invaded the Roman Empire in the 3rd to 5th centuries
and the third, which is the only negative definition, but in no way describes them as being witches or anything else:
a crude uncouth ill-bred person lacking culture or refinement (listed as a synonym for peasant)

Now, there are some pretty modern words and definition listed in dictionaries, everything from "bling", to "queer", both of which have only been used in the modern fashion within the past couple of decades. So if your definition of Goth is so well-known, and accepted, why has it never been included in any dictionary, even Bible based ones?

Oh, and in case anyone is confused by the word "lugubrious" in the definition above, here's a definition: mournful or gloomy to an exaggerated or ludicrous degree. (in simple terms, so sad its silly)

I understand that you believe the Goth movement to be a negative one, promoting negative ideals, and there are definitely aspects of it that a young person in their teens can misunderstand and take too far, causing harm to themselves. However, I disagree that every single person who chooses to listen to a certain type of music, or wear the color black in general, is an evil witch. If this was the case, it would be an accepted definition, which it is not.

[Don the Baptist]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

1. why is there no definition in any published dictionary listing those "qualities" as fact?

2. in case anyone is confused by the word "lugubrious" in the definition above, here's a definition: mournful or gloomy to an exaggerated or ludicrous degree. (in simple terms, so sad its silly)

1. Because common knowledge requires no reference, what is it with you atheists that denies the reality of this fact? I have stated that over and over again to you homers and yet all of you continue to ask silly assed questions like this.

2. Thanks for breaking it down for us like that sweetheart, we sure appreciate that. Just in case I lost you when I refer to "silly-assed" comments, please see your quote above for an excellent example. Hear that sound now? That's the wind whipping through your fecal matter replete cerebral cortex.

[InYourDreams]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

So suddenly I'm an atheist AND a homer? Even though I'm a married, Christian woman? Just because I said something you dont agree with, you call me names? I wasn't rude, I didn't call anyone a name, and I certainly never said I was an atheist. It's fine if you don't agree with me, that's what a forum is for, it's for discussion. But there's really no need for name-calling. And I certainly wasn't trying to be rude when I put up the definition for lugubrious. There are plenty of people who haven't heard the word before, simply because it's not a word that people hear every day.

[Don the Baptist]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

So suddenly I'm an atheist AND a homer? Even though I'm a married, Christian woman? Just because I said something you dont agree with, you call me names? I wasn't rude, I didn't call anyone a name, and I certainly never said I was an atheist. It's fine if you don't agree with me, that's what a forum is for, it's for discussion. But there's really no need for name-calling. And I certainly wasn't trying to be rude when I put up the definition for lugubrious. There are plenty of people who haven't heard the word before, simply because it's not a word that people hear every day.

No - not suddenly, I'd say by reading some of your posts that it has been a long time comin'. What with your "upsuck theory" as a means for a Godly woman to be able to contain copious amounts of her husband's "love juices" I am disgusted, I am.

[InYourDreams]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

No - not suddenly, I'd say by reading some of your posts that it has been a long time comin'. What with your "upsuck theory" as a means for a Godly woman to be able to contain copious amounts of her husband's "love juices" I am disgusted, I am.

Well it certainly isn't my theory, sheesh! I was just offering some information from the studies done. And as other people have said, I believe it is my duty as a Christian wife to do everything possible to ensure conception. On top of that, I never once said I subscribe to that theory, just that it was indeed a theory. I don't particularly care about "love juices", as you call them. I care about pleasing my husband and ensuring conception before he goes to Iraq to fight for our country. If you care to take issue with that, it's your choice, but I choose to honor my husband, my wedding vows, and my husband's desire to have another child, and to conceive as soon as possible, in case he is injured or killed defending our freedom.

[Herr_Doktor Phd.]

Re: FREE THE LANCASHIRE FIVE !

I only say that we cannot judge who is a witch or not, history proved that way to many times already. The only one who can judge is the Lord himself.

Of course you can Mr. Duck. There are protocols and procedures on how to discover a witch, judge a witch and execute a witch.

If you care too, I invite you to explore some of the works I use. The Malleus Maleficarum is a fine example of how to go about this.

Read this and tell me what you think:

http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org/part_I/mm01_toc.html

HD

Well it certainly isn't my theory, sheesh! I was just offering some information from the studies done. And as other people have said, I believe it is my duty as a Christian wife to do everything possible to ensure conception. On top of that, I never once said I subscribe to that theory, just that it was indeed a theory. I don't particularly care about "love juices", as you call them. I care about pleasing my husband and ensuring conception before he goes to Iraq to fight for our country. If you care to take issue with that, it's your choice, but I choose to honor my husband, my wedding vows, and my husband's desire to have another child, and to conceive as soon as possible, in case he is injured or killed defending our freedom.

You sound a little feisty to be a good submissive wife to a stalwart Christian Soldier. Are you sure you aren't some Goth lesbo Nazi Dyke in disguise and that your real purpose on these forums is to sow disruption and chaos?