[AHappyPerson]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

6. They don't believe in a loving, personal GOD who cares so much about us He volunteered His only son to die temporarily for our sins! If this didn't happen, how could any of us go to Heaven?

7. They don't believe in a GOD who is actively in control of Earth and our lives. Just the other day me and my wife received a prayer alert from her brother that our nephew would be taking a rather critical test in school, and that we should ask the LORD to guide Him and give Him the knowledge to pass it. The entire family prayed, and do you know what? He got an A+ on that test! That's all the proof I need!

8. Atheists are usually bad at debating and end up saying that you can't prove there IS a god, so why should they obey this religion or that? Well, to that I have to answer, just because you can't disprove GODdoesn't mean He doesn't exist. I can't believe the lack of logic these people have!

I offer a very simple idea of how your nephew could have done well on that test without divine intervention. He studied. And in this way a prayer could have been seen as a way to help him cheat. Not fair to the other students.

And there is also a very simple reason that you can't disprove that God exists in any given form. You cannot disprove a negative. For example, prove to me that there are no invisible unicorns galloping around in a forest somewhere. I will use your method.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Are you trolling? Because I have a very hard time believing someone could be this uneducated and primitive. How does a book prove the existence of an all powerful being? Harry potter is a book but just because they talk about a boy with magical abilities existing doesn't mean he does, yes as an actor (Daniel Radcliffe) but not as his character.

Yes, but Harry Potter wasn't written by God, was it.

Go and tell your master satan that we have Jesus on our side, and that we are not interested in your hatemongering.

[my_death]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Friends,

As we are currently discussing Why Atheists are so miserable, I have decided to start this new thread - to continue my '101 Reasons' Series with '101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG'.

Reason No. 1 - The Holy Bible!

Atheists 'claim' that God doesn't exist, yet the Bible proves them WRONG! I can see the Bible, hold it in my hand, and know 1000% that it exists! As God wrote the Bible, this proves that he MUST EXIST too! How dumb these Atheists are!

Reason No. 2 - Evil-ution from Monkeys!

If we really evolved from monkeys, why do monkeys STILL exist? Surely they would've evolved too? And why don't we have tails or swing from trees or speak in monkey-talk? These atheists must be pretty deluded to believe such nonsense!

Reason No. 3 - The 'Big Bang'

Atheists believe there was a 'Big Bang' which created the Earth and the Universe and all things?? Well, what created the 'Big Bang'?? And what was there before it 'banged'??? Ask ANY atheist - they won't be able to answer you! Why? Because God created the 'Big Bang'! And then went on to create the Earth and everything in just 6 days! Praise Jesus!

Reason No. 4 - Dinosaurs

Most dumb atheists believe that man and dinosaurs didn't inhabit the Earth at the same time. However, we know this to be a LIE! Didn't Noah ride dinosaurs onto the Ark? Aren't Dinosaurs mentioned throughout the Bible?

Checkmate - Atheist!


....MORE TO FOLLOW....

Are you trolling? Because I have a very hard time believing someone could be this uneducated and primitive. How does a book prove the existence of an all powerful being? Harry potter is a book but just because they talk about a boy with magical abilities existing doesn't mean he does, yes as an actor (Daniel Radcliffe) but not as his character.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Considering Darwinist as a "Monkey cult" is like saying that Wiccans are really witches. Atheists make solid points from various topics. And I can see why you think that we evolved from "monkeys". It's really simplistic, we came from a common ancestor, that's all.

Nothing is perfect, it's only better.
We are closely related to monkeys, but they're more like our uncles or aunts or cousins.
Saying that we HUNTED dino is like saying that hawks get hunted by small birds.
These atheists are just not ripe enough to comprehend the brilliant scientific discoveries that scientists are discovering. And science will NEVER. EVER. Help prove God is real. Scientific Creationism is an oxymormon.

Actually, if you swallow the evolution scam hook line and sinker, ALL of us have a common ancestor. So add foot fungus to your ancestry, friend.



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[Derpington]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

5. They have to lie to make their point (in which case their point must be a lie). They try to "prove" their Darwinist monkey cult through such obviously forged evidence as the Piltdown man, while ignoring real evidence such as the Paluxy man tracks.

Considering Darwinist as a "Monkey cult" is like saying that Wiccans are really witches. Atheists make solid points from various topics. And I can see why you think that we evolved from "monkeys". It's really simplistic, we came from a common ancestor, that's all.

Nothing is perfect, it's only better.
We are closely related to monkeys, but they're more like our uncles or aunts or cousins.
Saying that we HUNTED dino is like saying that hawks get hunted by small birds.
These atheists are just not ripe enough to comprehend the brilliant scientific discoveries that scientists are discovering. And science will NEVER. EVER. Help prove God is real. Scientific Creationism is an oxymoron.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Atheists enjoy butt sodomy, and that's sinful! Even the cripple Stephen hawking can get enough demon power in his loins to sodomize young evolution students in their butts!

You seem a little... preoccupied with what Sodomites do, dear.

Have you considered accepting Jesus Christ into your heart and being freed from this obsession? We can help!

[Ex Cashew]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Atheists enjoy butt sodomy, and that's sinful! Even the cripple Stephen hawking can get enough demon power in his loins to sodomize young evolution students in their butts!

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

You didn't really respond to my first three points, you just said they were lies without any real explanation as to why. On the last one, the quote is behemoth, which could be any large herbivore like a rhino or an elephant. This might not even be dinosaur. Unless it describes the features of the animals and they match any dinosaur we know, it doesn't count.

It does describe the features of the animal in considerable detail. Have you ever seen a rhino or an elephant? It is absolutely impossible for behemoth to be either. If you had read the linked article you would already know that. The point is covered in more detail here:

DINOSAURS link to post
A lot of our knowledge about the relationship between bones and soft tissue (muscles, tendons etc.) & nerves comes from sports medicine. I don’t need to tell you how critical this branch of science is on the football field or whatever, because you already know. Presumably the Romans had some similar knowledge gleaned over several hundred years of athletic competition - some of it may have trickled down to us, but any athletic culture will have such knowledge and - in the absence of actual dinosaurs - could apply that knowledge to any skeletons they found, just as we have done. (Actual dinosaurs would be better, though.) In the case of large dinosaurs - a stegosaurus, say - the brain cavity inside the skull is small. Quite complete skeletons exist and how the bones were linked together by muscles is fairly well understood thanks to the contribution of vets and chiropractors, whose expertise is quite relevant. They can distinguish from the shape of the bones where muscles were attached, where nerves ran etc., and can verify earlier knowledge that has been preserved, such as it is, to be correct.
Deuteronomy 34:7 And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated.
Our “natural force” as the Deuteronomist terms it, is associated with the head - we observe the world through our eyes, ears, etc., and associate language thought and consciousness primarily with the brain. The strength which enables us to rule over all the animals - whether you think we should do so or not - is our intelligence. Even the strongest human is weak compared to an elephant. That is why we are hunters, rather than hunted. Our natural force, and our strength lies in our head.
Stegosaurus has a very small head, and a tiny brain. Its strength lay in MUSCLE, and all those muscles control bones hinged from the spine and the hips - massive hind legs, huge thick spiked tail, front legs less powerful. The focus of the animal was its middle. The tiny brain only had to see food (grass, leaves) and eat it. The rest of the animal was controlled from a ganglion of nerves near the base of the tail. This was significantly larger than its brain, because it was controlling most of the muscles. The muscles controlled the bones (legs, swishing tail etc.) of these animals, and the large ganglion of nerves, protected underneath the hard backbone, controlled the muscles. For a stegosaurus then, its strength and its natural force are centrally located.
Job 40:15b, 16 he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
I am not saying that Behemoth = Stegosaurus; there were numerous animals in this category, all very much as described.
[Cyber Yahweh] has a link elsewhere in this thread to his most erudite lecture series.

Moving back to your 3rd "point" we find that you seem not to have read the mathematics describing either quantum fluctuations or singularities (or false vacuums either for that matter). You have not suggested any location for your "singularity" and therefore have not actually posed any question requiring an answer.

Your 2nd paragraph was about monkeys. No biologist has ever suggested that humans either evolved from or are a type of the monkey. Christians do not endorse the satanic lies of evolutionary biology, but what you wrote has nothing to do with biology of any description and so warrants no response. Because you've presented nothing to respond to.

I did not say that your book would contain lies (paragraph 1) I said I wouldn't read it.

_____________________________________________Unlike your intro post._____________________________________________


The introduction forum
Attention Unsaved Trash: This the ONLY subforum you can start threads in. Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

information from Pastor Billy-Reuben
re: **"Noobs" please read this before posting.** SERIOUSLY!
This is not a debate forum. The purpose of this site is to praise and glorify the Lord, Jesus Christ. It is a place for Christians to fellowship and worship. The goal of the Landover Baptist Church forum is to draw people to Jesus Christ because Scripture confirms that salvation comes only through Him.

Luke 6:22 tells us that because we preach the True doctrine of Jesus, men shall hate us and call us evil. So naturally, we expect that folks will get their feathers ruffled by some of the things they have to say, and they will come on here to argue with us. Perhaps we have said something that upset you. Maybe it was something I said. If so, then I am sorry that you are upset, but I do not apologize for what I have said. My words and thoughts come from the Holy Scriptures. I didn't write the Bible -- God did. So if my words upset you, then you don't have a problem with me -- you have a problem with God.

We tend to get two types of dissenters here. Some are calm and reasonable folks who are capable of rational discussion. I personally enjoy discussing religious topics with this sort of person. Others, however, are angry trolls who are just here to flame us. If you are here to flame us, please read this first.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Pastor Ezekiel,

Can you prove to me that the original bible and these prophecies have not been perverted? Unless you have seen the prophecies when they were originally spoken and have read the original bible, all your scriptural evidence is null and void.

You can try this link.

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Pastor Ezekiel,

Can you prove to me that the original bible and these prophecies have not been perverted? Unless you have seen the prophecies when they were originally spoken and have read the original bible, all your scriptural evidence is null and void.

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

You didn't really respond to my first three points, you just said they were lies without any real explanation as to why. On the last one, the quote is behemoth, which could be any large herbivore like a rhino or an elephant. This might not even be dinosaur. Unless it describes the features of the animals and they match any dinosaur we know, it doesn't count.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

How's the introductory post coming along? It doesn't have to be a very good post. At first my posts were all weird because I had only used the one browser and then it crashed or something so I had to use a different browser or I was on a different computer or I can't remember now but anyway, I saw all these peculiar fonts and all different sized text and thought "who's this crackpot?" and then saw it was me because the other browser didn't recognise ¾ of what the other other one did but you are having a different problem viz:

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

1) You seem to be having things all mixed up. God is all powerful because, with respect to the universe He created, He is greater than the sum total of its constituent parts. Since "universe" signifies that of which there is only one i.e. everything that exists whether we can observe it or not (which means that your dopey "multiverse" models collapse because however many of them there may be they still fall within the category "everything that exists whether we can observe it or not" I could demonstrate that using set theory, it's pretty basic really). Therefore when God speaks (He uses the Imperative mood incidentally) what He says may be relied on. If it were not so the universe would not exist. As you can see, there is no begging the question going on here.

Based on what you've posted so far, I probably wouldn't read one of your books much beyond the subtitle. The veracity of what you claimed in its pages is a question that would never arise.

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

2) Simple biology. Well what you have here is not biology at all. It is simple however. Your pope, Richard Dawkins, frequently addresses exactly the error you hiss. Just because some nutter has this theory how worms turn into Chinese hairless dogs (which is obviously ridiculous) does not mean we have not understood what the "theory" actually claims. Normally it's discussed at junior school level. Perhaps you missed that day?

It is because we understand what maniacs (such as the Dawkins) have to say that we are able to discern their error. Yes, at school there are young and impressionable minds for the Godless science of atheism to warp and corrupt. Their ignorance is exploited. But the full grown evolutionary biologist has no such excuse. His aim is to destroy God's Plan to remove the disgusting sin that brims in each newborn baby so that it and all its siblings will never hear The Gospel winding up in HELL FOREVER.

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

3) Singularity. Originally what masquerades as "physics" these days came under the umbrella of alchemy but even so, some elements of the subject remain in Valence Bond Theory which you must have been taught at some stage if you're interested in chemistry. Again, without understanding these satanic lies it would be impossible for us to point out how they contradict Scripture which, as has already been demonstrated, is The Inerrant Word of God. According to nitwits such as Sam Harris, who addresses this point frequently, the whole point of your "singularity" is that it must be causeless. The maths would be needed to describe its location. If there were a singularity, where was it?

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

4) Job 40 . picture . etymology

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Please explain to me the scientific method that proves the Bible.

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

=scientific method and a philosophical positivism.

Please explain to me the scientific method that proves the Bible.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

I assume that this is based of the ideas of James Randi, but didn't he also state that people claiming the existence of something must give evidence as well. Please provide your evidence.

By the way, don't use the Bible because using something that is circularly justified is not real evidence.

No it is based on the scientific method and a philosophical positivism.

But you would need a higher eduction to realise that.

YIC