[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

Hrm sounds like fun... was hoping for more from such intelluigent men... a debate on the whole issue maybe, but meh...

What exactly is there to debate?

God's Word is black and white. Women are to keep their silence in church, and are not to usurp authority over men.

End of story.

[Annika]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

Im not mocking your god... cant some people just... look for insight I guess you could call it that...

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

Im not mocking your god... cant some people just... look for insight I guess you could call it that...

You mean ignore God's Word? I'd call it that.

[angelgrlinNC]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

boy are you big on the words lesbian and feminazi bitch. i am not a lesbian and i was married for 20 years as if it is any business of yours. my ex-husband was the fornicator in our marriage. what does that make him? i guess in your church that makes him a saint right? wrong. and i don't pretend to be perfect in my knowledge of god and every word he has ever said but i can tell you this. we are ALL sinners and come short of the glory of god. and you are no exception. we are all nothing but dirt under his feet. and another thing. we are not suppose to judge each other, we are suppose to help each other. you are suppose to bring people to Christ not knock them down with bad, hateful words. do as Jesus would do and in every situation you should ask yourself what would Jesus do. i don't think he would smack a woman around, call a black man a Negro or belittle his fellow man. think about that for a while.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

what would Jesus do. i don't think he would smack a woman around, call a black man a Negro or belittle his fellow man. think about that for a while.

Why wouldn't He call a black man a Negro? That's the name of the race. Look it up.

Never heard of the United Negro College Fund?

Why would He not belittle humans? We are not "His fellow man". He's God. We're mere humans. And He called the unbelieving Pharisees a "generation of vipers"; does that sound complimentary?

[Annika]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

You mean ignore God's Word? I'd call it that.

Ignore it? maybe? laugh at how people take it to far, Probably, think about it despite my "undersized" woman brains is a definite... sigh* what to choose I need a man to think for me... Right?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

Ignore it? maybe? laugh at how people take it to far, Probably, think about it despite my "undersized" woman brains is a definite... sigh* what to choose I need a man to think for me... Right?

If you want to please God, then you need to shut your yap and follow the Bible.

1 Timothy 2:11-15
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.

1 Peter 3:1
Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands.

[Annika]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

If you want to please God, then you need to shut your yap and follow the Bible.

I dont want to please god... thats your job right? to be "better" than us... if we all wanted to do that we wold all be equal and we would all die... its that simple... I enjoy life, while you focus on whats after death... Im here NOW thats enough for me

[Miss Abigail]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

As many of you know, my dear husband, my pastor (and previously my father) have done most of my thinking for me. The only things needed for a True Christian™ woman to "think" are the Bible, and Godly TC Men.

At one time in my life, I believed that everyone must know how limited women's thoughts are. But apparently, some women actually believe they can think better than men! I'm here to prove that delusion wrong, using my Godly KJV1611 Bible!

1st Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

Now, why would a woman not be permitted to teach a man? Because she cannot think as well as a man! In fact, God is so sure women can't do an awful lot of thinking, he tells women to shut their traps altogether! Man is on top, woman is underneath him, and he tells her what she should do.

Need more proof, you Feminazis? Here:

1st Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

Now, "head" has several meanings. The man is, as we see in the quote above, head of the woman. A Godly True Christian™ woman immediately gives head to a man, but an unsubmissive woman must be forced to. A woman who does not give head to her husband, cannot give head to Jesus either. Therefore, we see it is very important to give head (leadership, control) to the man. Why else would Jesus give head to the man over the woman? Because he can think better! Another meaning of head, which is the one we shall use here, is traditionally "brain". Man has brains over the womenfolk! Even the sickulars support this, with men getting better IQ results.

So, Ladies, next time you think...don't.

see this right here is the reason I appreciate Lilith so much...she DID think for herself. As do I

[Atheist and Agnostic]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

Why wouldn't He call a black man a Negro? That's the name of the race. Look it up.

I think you need to look it up. Genetically speaking, race does not exist in humans. While there is plenty of genetic variation in humans, most of the variation is individual variation. While between-population variation exists, it is either too small, which is a quantitative variation, or it is not the right qualitative type of variation -- it does not mark historical sublineages of humanity.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

I think you need to look it up. Genetically speaking, race does not exist in humans. While there is plenty of genetic variation in humans, most of the variation is individual variation. While between-population variation exists, it is either too small, which is a quantitative variation, or it is not the right qualitative type of variation -- it does not mark historical sublineages of humanity.

I got a small headache reading all that, but I'm sure quantitative variation is not mentioned in my KJV.

Do you know who the quote below is from? You might want to explain it to him when you meet in hell.

But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we've come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.

Genesis 9:18
And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.

[Nobar King]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

I got a small headache reading all that.

I'm glad it wasn't just me.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

I think you need to look it up. Genetically speaking, race does not exist in humans. While there is plenty of genetic variation in humans, most of the variation is individual variation. While between-population variation exists, it is either too small, which is a quantitative variation, or it is not the right qualitative type of variation -- it does not mark historical sublineages of humanity.

This is typical hypocritical LIEbral political correctness run amuck. Taxonomy is fine for all other species, but not right when it come to humans, particularly when there are underlying phenotypes and genotypes? Don't come here with your secular "science" when you don't know what you are talking about.

[Bummer]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

As many of you know, my dear husband, my pastor (and previously my father) have done most of my thinking for me. The only things needed for a True Christian™ woman to "think" are the Bible, and Godly TC Men.

At one time in my life, I believed that everyone must know how limited women's thoughts are. But apparently, some women actually believe they can think better than men! I'm here to prove that delusion wrong, using my Godly KJV1611 Bible!

1st Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

Now, why would a woman not be permitted to teach a man? Because she cannot think as well as a man! In fact, God is so sure women can't do an awful lot of thinking, he tells women to shut their traps altogether! Man is on top, woman is underneath him, and he tells her what she should do.

Need more proof, you Feminazis? Here:

1st Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

Now, "head" has several meanings. The man is, as we see in the quote above, head of the woman. A Godly True Christian™ woman immediately gives head to a man, but an unsubmissive woman must be forced to. A woman who does not give head to her husband, cannot give head to Jesus either. Therefore, we see it is very important to give head (leadership, control) to the man. Why else would Jesus give head to the man over the woman? Because he can think better! Another meaning of head, which is the one we shall use here, is traditionally "brain". Man has brains over the womenfolk! Even the sickulars support this, with men getting better IQ results.

So, Ladies, next time you think...don't.

Well, i feel sorry for you Jean, you never got to make your own choices in life and you still can't. You are now what age? 40? 50? And your whole life has been controlled by men around you and a book which was written... i have to look that up, starting to be written 1450 - 1410 B.C.

And i would be careful with using the term "giving head" since for most people that does mean oralsex...
Which also proves your lifelong isolation.

Well, to make an example, Sarah Palin is smart, though she would get further without being so attached to the Bible and actually listening to her advisors, and hey, learning politics. Bush is an idiot, close to retard. And Obama is a genius! There is no sense what so ever to talking about "women are don't have brains as men, black people don't have brains as white" etc etc. Because it's all BS! (short for bullshit in case you didn't know) Have you heard of an IQ test? You seem like a smart woman, i suggest you try it and i bet you will score higher than your husband.

[JennyD]

Re: Should women think for themselves? NO!

Well, to make an example, Sarah Palin is smart, though she would get further without being so attached to the Bible and actually listening to her advisors, and hey, learning politics.

Tell me, Bun-bun, how far do you think the average woman who had to go to five different schools to finally eke out a bachelor's degree in journalism would go without God?

Do you think she'd become governor of an entire state, and run for vice-president?

I don't. There are plenty of women who ignore Jesus and have advanced degrees who have not gone nearly as far as the Sarahcudda.