[Basilissa]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

I always thought a Baptist was the person who poured water over your head during a baptism
Like it was a job in a church like a priest or choir singers

The level of your ignorance is quite impressive. Are you a product of one of the inner city public schools?

[Dotty too]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

You really are a retard, aren't you?



Baptist.

Not Catholic.

I always thought a Baptist was the person who poured water over your head during a baptism
Like it was a job in a church like a priest or choir singers

[Basilissa]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

you're probably catholic.

You really are a retard, aren't you?



Baptist.

Not Catholic.

[RetardCat13th]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

Dear, I am NOT a pederast. I am somewhat of a devotee of grammar pedagogy, I will admit.

no, you're the result of pederasty. its how <<<explicative deleted>>> reproduce. it's plain as day for all to see. nasty filthy thing that you are, completely up your own <<<explicative deleted>>>.


you're probably catholic.

[handmaiden]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

i wasn't expecting so many uptight pederasts. a couple of those errors i dont normaly make. probably edited in by the pederast mods you pederasts have here.

Dear, I am NOT a pederast. I am somewhat of a devotee of grammar pedagogy, I will admit.


I assure, those are not one in the same. . . Unlike Jesus who is God and the Son of God at the same time. And who loved us so much that He sent His only begotten Son, who was Himself, and existed as His Son before He was begotten on earth, to die on our behalf so that He could make us acceptable in His sight by the gift of His Blood, that He sacrificed to give to Himself on our behalf.

[RetardCat13th]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

[QUOTE=handmaiden]Sheesh! You managed to spell "sanctimonious" correctly.[QUOTE]



you being sanctimonious about sanctimony, well that's just typical. guess i had that one right then?


[QUOTE]Sarah Lawrence College?[QUOTE]


is that where you failed to learn how to not be so obviously a pederast?

[RetardCat13th]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

Frankly, after all that, I don't know what the heck you mean.




And it's "manner", not "manor". Moreover, "too persons" should be written as "two persons."


Sheesh! You managed to spell "sanctimonious" correctly.


I realize that anybody can make a typo, but is your shift key out of whack? Capitalization would make some of the bizarre blather you wrote more comprehensible.

i wasn't expecting so many uptight pederasts. a couple of those errors i dont normaly make. probably edited in by the pederast mods you pederasts have here.

[Alvin Moss]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

DRIVEL LARGELY REMOVED-----

there is no valid argument against evolution. factually, it's the manor in which god created us if it be that god created us at all.


there is good reason to be against bdsm communities. they're overrun by special interest groups that care nothing for objective truth and everything about power. they're overrun by posers and heroin dependent pederasts who give not a single witt for freedom of speech.

I don't mean to belittle your intellectual ability. I am certain that would be triggering, but I have a question and a comment. The question- Are you saying that the Lord created mankind while He was visiting a fine country house?


The comment- Your profile says you are 40 years old. God sends liars to Hell. What I see here is a pseudo intellectual attempt to seem relevant and intelligent. You are not 40 years old. You are a sophomore at...what? Swarthmore? Sarah Lawrence College? Don't they teach you girls how to spell anymore?

[handmaiden]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

not exactly. saying that you have the clue no one else does in regard to what god hates is more than a little arrogant. furthermore, there's little indication as to what god hates or that god hates, what-so-ever.


is or can bdsm be disruptive? bdsm is for experts and untrained persons or dabbler hobbyists often get it wrong.


there is no valid argument against evolution. factually, it's the manor in which god created us if it be that god created us at all. "and so they came to be, according to their kind." plenty of people are still unaware that darwin wasn't an atheist.


but you're right in that there is good reason to be against bdsm communities. they're overrun by special interest groups that care nothing for objective truth and everything about power. they're overrun by posers and heroin dependent pederasts who give not a single witt for freedom of speech.


if you ask nicely, i'll tell you where you can still find a god (or something else) speaking to you. i do expect any questions to be asked in a manor and with the pretense that i actually do know and actually can tell you. you wont be happy with the answer but that's because it will seem fatuous. it will also seem underwhelming because while i can tell you where to look, i cant tell you what is being said. it seems to be for each person and each person alone but i haven't really checked that the same experience is shared between too persons or more. it has seemed to be, but i've not verified to my own satisfaction. after that i ask you not to tell anyone else but rather send them to me to ask me instead. it's not too much to ask for a little credit. and if you think you'd like me to tell you what i think god's name is, i think it should be obvious so far. first please guess what i'd say god's name is.


i'd think most of the valid condemnation for bdsm is from the standpoint that persons tend to sanctimoniously cling to subjectivity. bdsm is a subjective machination of objectivity. it's a confusion of impulses that are for pair bonding. you might notice a correlation to this perfectly valid condemnation of bdsm communities. and yes, i mean it.

Frankly, after all that, I don't know what the heck you mean.




And it's "manner", not "manor". Moreover, "too persons" should be written as "two persons."


Sheesh! You managed to spell "sanctimonious" correctly.


I realize that anybody can make a typo, but is your shift key out of whack? Capitalization would make some of the bizarre blather you wrote more comprehensible.

[RetardCat13th]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

GOD HATES BDSM!

not exactly. saying that you have the clue no one else does in regard to what god hates is more than a little arrogant. furthermore, there's little indication as to what god hates or that god hates, what-so-ever.


is or can bdsm be disruptive? bdsm is for experts and untrained persons or dabbler hobbyists often get it wrong.


there is no valid argument against evolution. factually, it's the manor in which god created us if it be that god created us at all. "and so they came to be, according to their kind." plenty of people are still unaware that darwin wasn't an atheist.


but you're right in that there is good reason to be against bdsm communities. they're overrun by special interest groups that care nothing for objective truth and everything about power. they're overrun by posers and heroin dependent pederasts who give not a single witt for freedom of speech.


if you ask nicely, i'll tell you where you can still find a god (or something else) speaking to you. i do expect any questions to be asked in a manor and with the pretense that i actually do know and actually can tell you. you wont be happy with the answer but that's because it will seem fatuous. it will also seem underwhelming because while i can tell you where to look, i cant tell you what is being said. it seems to be for each person and each person alone but i haven't really checked that the same experience is shared between too persons or more. it has seemed to be, but i've not verified to my own satisfaction. after that i ask you not to tell anyone else but rather send them to me to ask me instead. it's not too much to ask for a little credit. and if you think you'd like me to tell you what i think god's name is, i think it should be obvious so far. first please guess what i'd say god's name is.


i'd think most of the valid condemnation for bdsm is from the standpoint that persons tend to sanctimoniously cling to subjectivity. bdsm is a subjective machination of objectivity. it's a confusion of impulses that are for pair bonding. you might notice a correlation to this perfectly valid condemnation of bdsm communities. and yes, i mean it.

[Thomas Taylor]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

From monitoring the viewing activities I have discovered that a large number of new members arrive at this thread first. This could be down to 1 or 2 reasons, namely:
1. They come from Pakistan and are mooslim perverts.
2. They come form the US and are mooslim perverts.
3. They are gay homosexuals
4. They are perverts.


In accordance with civil and federal laws we are unable to provide the punishment they require under God's Law as laid bare in the book of Leviticus chapter 18 which defines these transgressions and Leviticus 20 which outlines the specific punishments for said digressions.


Please let's start a campaign to make America a True Christian Country acting under God's Law, not the diluted crapola the Obama scum forced through. Hopefully Pres. Trump will revoke all these laws and invoke Biblical Law on the country.


YIC
TT

[Alvin Moss]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

But I'm not trying to criticize anyone's beliefs...What's with all the anger?

You mistake our concern that you have chosen the path to Hell as anger. We are not angry with you. We only seek to turn you from your disastrous path before it is too late and you find yourself swimming in the Lake of Fire, with the flesh dripping from your bones, only to reform and melt away again, over and over, forever. Our goal is to save you from eternal punishment, not to make fun of your ridiculous sexual perversions. We will make off the color jokes about you in private conversations, over cookies and coffee, where you will not hear of it.

[Didymus Much]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

But I'm not trying to criticize anyone's beliefs...

criticize

[krit-uh-sahyz]
Spell Syllables

• Synonyms
• Examples
• Word Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
verb (used with object), criticized, criticizing.1.to censure or find fault with.

2.to judge or discuss the merits and faults of:to criticize three novels in one review.


verb (used without object), criticized, criticizing.3.to find fault; judge unfavorably or harshly.

4.to make judgments as to merits and faults.

That's EXACTLY what you're doing. Definition from dictionary.com.

...What's with all the anger?

It's not anger, it's exasperation with people that refuse to read what is written as it is written, like you're doing right now.

[UnapologeticHeathen]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

But I'm not trying to criticize anyone's beliefs...What's with all the anger?

[Didymus Much]

Re: GOD HATES BDSM!

...You say you don't hate me as your clique openly calls me a vile pervert and makes derogatory gay comments toward me?...

If they actually hated you, they'd WANT you to go to Hell, right? Yet the entire purpose of this forum (funded by THEIR money) is to get people to read the Bible and come to Jesus, while being thanked for their sacrifice (of time [lots of that] and money, trying to save a few wretched souls) by being called hateful by PEOPLE WHO REFUSE TO READ WHAT IS WRITTEN IN PLAIN ENGLISH, like you.

...There's a very blatant and somewhat unwelcoming dislike of me because I've broken a few of your commandments which is clearly disproportionate to the dislike I guess you would have for somebody who eats shellfish...

Um, they're Christians, not Jews. Jesus did away with the dietary restrictions, which you'd know if you bothered to read the whole Bible, instead of a few cherry-picked bits from here and there.

...All I'm trying to ask is for a specific or two on why that clearly disproportionately hateful reaction exists for sins involving sex and not other things.

Again, there's nothing disproportionate. Absolute, perfect obedience to every last requirement laid out in the Bible is required:

James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."

Protip: if you want to criticize people's beliefs, learn what they actually are, first. You'll look less of an ignorant hypocrite that way.