[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

No. Homosexuals shouldn't be allowed near children or animals at all. Ticking time bombs, that's what they are. They are like loaded guns - they can go off at any time.

Untrue. The only difference between a straight person and a gay person is their sexual preference.

Brendon P., I know you are still intimidated by Spencer's father. Please look up "Stockholm syndrome" on the internet to understand why you defend what shouldn't be defended I'll pray for you tonight.

Nothing has ever happened to me - nothing severe enough for me to develop Stockholm Syndrome. Spencer's father is like family to me; I've known him for years. Though, you do not know him. Assume what you please, but he's a good man. And also, don't waste your time praying on me. I'm sure there're better things to spend time on. :-]]

[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

Not for long. Yes, some queers profess "love" for just one partner initially, but it's only a matter of time until the fag agenda and the lure of anonymous homo-rectal intercourse has them in the toilet stalls and back allies, coupled to dozens of strange sissies every day and night.

The father of my best friend, who I mentioned earlier, has been in a monogamous gay relationship for a little over nine years. They are devoted. Sure, gay people cheat on each other, but are you honestly implying that straight people don't cheat? Because if you are, wow, you're wrong. I'm positive married straight people with children cheat as well, so.

The number one priority with all fags is filthy sodomy and fellatio, as often as possible, and with as many "partners" as they can solicit. Does this sound like someone suited for raising children?

I disagree. There are plenty of gay people out there who are looking for a relationship, not sex. Sure, once in an established relationship, they'll do other stuff, but with each other. I have never once met a homosexual person who's main goal was to have sex all the time with all different people. So. And also, once again, you seem to be implying that no straight people do this. If gay people do, then there are going to be twice as many straight people doing it, too. No, I do not think someone like that is suited for raising children, but you inaccurately described it. You are mistaken.

[Ex-soccer player]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

The number one priority with all fags is filthy sodomy and fellatio, as often as possible, and with as many "partners" as they can solicit. Does this sound like someone suited for raising children?

No. Homosexuals shouldn't be allowed near children or animals at all. Ticking time bombs, that's what they are. They are like loaded guns - they can go off at any time.

Brendon P., I know you are still intimidated by Spencer's father. Please look up "Stockholm syndrome" on the internet to understand why you defend what shouldn't be defended I'll pray for you tonight.

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

It happens. But gay people are, by all means, capable of having families. The majority of them work out just as well as straight families.

Not for long. Yes, some queers profess "love" for just one partner initially, but it's only a matter of time until the fag agenda and the lure of anonymous homo-rectal intercourse has them in the toilet stalls and back allies, coupled to dozens of strange sissies every day and night.

The number one priority with all fags is filthy sodomy and fellatio, as often as possible, and with as many "partners" as they can solicit. Does this sound like someone suited for raising children?

In Christ

[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

If you asked a Priest whether he had raped a child he would deny it and he would threaten to kill the child and his family a friends if he told on the priest.

What makes you think it would be any different for this poor child?

This child was (is) my best friend. His name's Spencer. I know his parents, and they're lovely. His dad would never do that. His mother and father were together for ten years, and for eight of which, Spencer was alive. Don't you think that his dad would have done something no matter the relationship if he was the type of person to do things like that? Spencer tells me everything. Yes, it would be different for this child. He's actually my age now.

Or are you saying anal rape is a myth? Open your eyes :angry

No, anal rape is definitely not a myth. It happens. But gay people are, by all means, capable of having families. The majority of them work out just as well as straight families.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

He was perfectly fine when he visited his dad and no raping of children happened.

If you asked a Priest whether he had raped a child he would deny it and he would threaten to kill the child and his family a friends if he told on the priest.

What makes you think it would be any different for this poor child?

Or are you saying anal rape is a myth? Open your eyes

YIC

[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

Of course they want kids...SO THEY CAN RAPE THEM.

Good grief, open your eyes man! Why do you hate children???



YiC,

Zech

I have a friend, and when their parents split up when they were young, their dad was in a gay relationship. Their mom was fine with it, and so was my friend - they were about eight when it happened. He was perfectly fine when he visited his dad and no raping of children happened.

I don't hate children. I'm just not judgmental, and I believe that if one wants a family, they can have a family, so long as they know how to have one. My eyes are wide open, and apparently, I can see what you all are blind to.

This isn't the place to voice your support for the homosexual agenda. We're here to talk about God. Please start a thread in the introduction forum and tell us what church you attend, what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this thread is titled "Top Ten Reasons Why Gay Marriage Is Wrong". Now, yes, this might have religious roots, but it seems to me like you're discussing your personal opinions. From the OP, only one of the ten reasons are related to god. I'm not discussing any homosexual agenda. I was replying to a person's theory, as it was illogical. :-]]

[Pim Pendergast]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

Why should they be related? If a gay person, or anyone, really, wanted to participate in child pornography, of course they'd plan on no one finding out, yeah? So why would they care if they have gay rights or not? I think you're looking for something that isn't really there.



1953 in Germany is far different from 1953 in America, as was 1994. You can't hold these statistics against other countries as well. I'd like you to take the statistics from America during those times and compare them to Germany's. :-]



Gay rights weren't mentioned either. As far as people back then were concerned, both were taboo. Both still existed, and people still knew what they were, and both probably still happened. There just wasn't anyone to find out.



And who is to say that child pornography hadn't already began happening before then? You can't just kip a gap of 44-45 years. That makes your theory inaccurate. If you look at strictly 1995, then sure, it'd look related. But you need to look closer.



Your study, so far, has said nothing about religion. Technically, Jesus didn't say anything about the matter, just you. But besides that: as I've said before, you need to look at the climbing data for 1995-2001. Obviously 4364 cases didn't get reported on the same day. There isn't any actual proof that they're related. Anyways, why do you think child rapists/pedophiles/whatever would care about whether or not they can get recognized as being in a civil partnership? They wouldn't. That's just stupid; they don't relate.



Goodness gracious. Is it so impossible for you to believe that maybe these people just want kids? First of all, there's no denying that yes, gay people rape other people, sometimes kids. But there's definitely no denying that straight people do it, too. Any person could want a family; just because they're gay, it doesn't mean they want to do anything a straight person wouldn't.

Overall, I'd give your theory an F. You sure know how to twist things to make it sound like something, but boil it down and you've got nothing.

This isn't the place to voice your support for the homosexual agenda. We're here to talk about God. Please start a thread in the introduction forum and tell us what church you attend, what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

blah blah blah Is it so impossible for you to believe that maybe these people just want kids? blah blah blah

Of course they want kids...SO THEY CAN RAPE THEM.

Good grief, open your eyes man! Why do you hate children???



YiC,

Zech

[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

I did some research on the relation between homosexuality and crimes against children and discovered that there is a unambiguous link between gay rights and child pornography. Some of you might be interested so I decided to post it here in this thread.

Why should they be related? If a gay person, or anyone, really, wanted to participate in child pornography, of course they'd plan on no one finding out, yeah? So why would they care if they have gay rights or not? I think you're looking for something that isn't really there.

These are figures from German crime statistics (PKS), but we can assume that we have a similar situation in other countries who have surrendered to the gay agenda.

1953 in Germany is far different from 1953 in America, as was 1994. You can't hold these statistics against other countries as well. I'd like you to take the statistics from America during those times and compare them to Germany's. :-]

- In 1953, homosexuality was considered a crime and gays had just the rights they deserve according to the Holy Bibel: No rights whatsoever.

The crime statistics from 1953 report NO incidents of child pornography. You don't even find it mentioned. No gay rights, no child porn. Easy to understand.

Gay rights weren't mentioned either. As far as people back then were concerned, both were taboo. Both still existed, and people still knew what they were, and both probably still happened. There just wasn't anyone to find out.

- In 1994, the § 175 StGB (the article which made homosexual acts between males a crime) was abolished after being watered down many times before. Greenlight for sodomy!

The crime statistics from 1995 already show 414 detected cases of child pornography. I'm not a mathematician, but I think compared to the figures from 1953 this is an increase of 414% or more

And who is to say that child pornography hadn't already began happening before then? You can't just kip a gap of 44-45 years. That makes your theory inaccurate. If you look at strictly 1995, then sure, it'd look related. But you need to look closer.

- In 2001, the homers were granted "civil partnership", a legally recognized form of homo partnership and a sick travesty of normal marriage. In the same year we see 4364 cases of child pornography. So the numbers have increased tenfold in only six years! "That's coincidence" I hear the liberals saying. "No it's not" says Jesus, and so do I.

Your study, so far, has said nothing about religion. Technically, Jesus didn't say anything about the matter, just you. But besides that: as I've said before, you need to look at the climbing data for 1995-2001. Obviously 4364 cases didn't get reported on the same day. There isn't any actual proof that they're related. Anyways, why do you think child rapists/pedophiles/whatever would care about whether or not they can get recognized as being in a civil partnership? They wouldn't. That's just stupid; they don't relate.

Now we're talking about "LGBT adoption rights" and I fear that the child pornograp[h]y crime rate is going to explode because until now the gay porn industry had to kidnap the children from the streets, but with adoption rights they can just order them from the government.

Goodness gracious. Is it so impossible for you to believe that maybe these people just want kids? First of all, there's no denying that yes, gay people rape other people, sometimes kids. But there's definitely no denying that straight people do it, too. Any person could want a family; just because they're gay, it doesn't mean they want to do anything a straight person wouldn't.

Overall, I'd give your theory an F. You sure know how to twist things to make it sound like something, but boil it down and you've got nothing.

[Ex-soccer player]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

4) Gay Marriage promotes Child Molestation. If gays are married, they will invariable adopt children to make a "family". Sorry, but Don Vito Corleone had a more functional, healthy, moral family than any gay couple could ever have. We know gays are child molestors. Can you imagine an innocent 5 year old boy having to endure night after night of two creepy mustachioed perverts who tell him "Don't worry....it tastes like ice cream."? If you support gay marriage, you support child molestation. It's that simple.

5) Kindergartners will be shown gay porn. You'd have to be monumentally naive to think that if we just give gays the right to marry, they will all shut up and not try to press their agenda further. History will show that's not the case. When the famous Stonewall riots happened in the 60's, they wanted gay bars legalized. So we let them. Then they started to fight against job discrimination, especially being teachers. So we let them. Then they fought for "Don't Ask Don't Tell". When it was introduced, gay rights supporters were all for it...because it was a compromise. Now, they got greedy and they feel they have a right to be OUT AND PROUD about their sins, and now DADT is a bad thing. Point is: You give the Gay Agenda an inch, they take a mile. WE NEED TO DRAW THE LINE *NOW*! Once marriage is legalized, they will seek to promote homosexuality more in society. Gay porn for kindergartners and forcing people into gay marriages are what's next up.

I did some research on the relation beween homosexuality and crimes against children and discovered that there is a unambiguous link between gay rights and child pornography. Some of you might be interested so I decided to post it here in this thread.

These are figures from German crime statistics (PKS), but we can assume that we have a similar situation in other countries who have surrendered to the gay agenda.


- In 1953, homosexuality was considered a crime and gays had just the rights they deserve according to the Holy Bibel: No rights whatsoever.

The crime statistics from 1953 report NO incidents of child pornography. You don't even find it mentioned. No gay rights, no child porn. Easy to understand


- In 1994, the § 175 StGB (the article which made homosexual acts between males a crime) was abolished after being watered down many times before. Greenlight for sodomy!

The crime statistics from 1995 already show 414 detected cases of child pornography. I'm not a mathematician, but I think compared to the figures from 1953 this is an increase of 414% or more


- In 2001, the homers were granted "civil partnership", a legally recognized form of homo partnership and a sick travesty of normal marriage. In the same year we see 4364 cases of child pornography. So the numbers have increased tenfold in only six years! "That's coincidence" I hear the liberals saying. "No it's not" says Jesus, and so do I.


Now we're talking about "LGBT adoption rights" and I fear that the child pornograpy crime rate is going to explode because until now the gay porn industry had to kidnap the children from the streets, but with adoption rights they can just order them from the government.

I don't know about you but I have a VERY bad feeling about this.

[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

There's no need to be rude, dear. Miss Lizalor is one of the most polite and civil ladies I've ever known. Don't you think it's appropriate to treat a lady with common courtesy?

I apologize. I momentarily forgot that people can't generally hear my tone through the internet. I honestly didn't mean it in a rude way, but rather sort of in a laughing way. But I'm sorry, anyway. Excuse my lack of manners, please. :-]

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

I posted a definition; how the hell could you know what my intentions were if I've never told you?

There's no need to be rude, dear. Miss Lizalor is one of the most polite and civil ladies I've ever known. Don't you think it's appropriate to treat a lady with common courtesy?

[Brendon Pisshead]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

There was only one point.

Technically speaking, there were four topics in your post.

Yes it was.

I posted a definition; how the hell could you know what my intentions were if I've never told you?

I don't understand. How is Salvation is a joke to you?

That wasn't the joke. The joke was barely even related to what the guy was saying. My joke was that he had said straight was a synonym for normal, and I was proving that it wasn't, hence the fact that I had bolded the synonyms in my post. That was the joke. I was being utterly literal.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Top Ten Reasons Why GAY MARRIAGE is WRONG!

but maybe you guys can't take jokes?

I don't understand. How is Salvation is a joke to you?