[Vengeance Puriel]

Re: It's me again

I'm starting Ballet class this Monday. Pray that I don't mess up to badly

Trade in the leotards in for a BIBLE KJV1611

[OneFailure]

Re: It's me again

Trade in the leotards in for a BIBLE KJV1611

I already have that one

[OneFailure]

Re: It's me again

Trade in the leotards in for a BIBLE KJV1611

By the way I'm not wearing a leotard to class

[Dana723]

Re: It's me again

By the way I'm not wearing a leotard to class

You're going NAKED?

[James Hutchins]

Re: It's me again

By the way I'm not wearing a leotard to class

I saw one of these classes once (might of been twice). I thought it was a bayonet class.

Just imagine my horror at seeing all these men in tutu's, some wearing a thong underneath, some had nothing at all! The sight of 30 men, all squatting in front of mirrors was something I'll not soon forget.

[OneFailure]

Re: It's me again

You're going NAKED?

No I'm wearing a white shirt and tights

[OneFailure]

Re: It's me again

I saw one of these classes once (might of been twice). I thought it was a bayonet class.

Just imagine my horror at seeing all these men in tutu's, some wearing a thong underneath, some had nothing at all! The sight of 30 men, all squatting in front of mirrors was something I'll not soon forget.

Men don't wear tutus they wear tights or sometimes tight pants and a shirt. Are you sure you weren't looking at a women's class or mixed class?

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: It's me again

Men don't wear tutus they wear tights or sometimes tight pants and a shirt. Are you sure you weren't looking at a women's class or mixed class?

I think, dear, that Brother Hutchins is old enough and experienced enough to know the difference! Are you?


Brother James, do you think you could have inadvertently strayed into a TRANSwomen's class? One has to be so very, very careful these days: it is as though Deuteronomy 22:5 had never been written.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Hello

God did not create cancer

Making up a different Jesus, the Son of a different "God" and giving Him different characteristics for any reason is a direct contradiction of what He has told us about Himself. No-one making any such claim is a Christian. If I am wrong about this, please provide the source of your new information so that I can be corrected if your sources hold water. But so far they're looking pretty leaky to me.

Okay

I was encouraged to read your response agreeing to provide the source of your new information which seems to me to contradict The Bible. As yet the actual references haven't been forthcoming. Instead of obsessing over Nijinsky and men in tights more generally, your next post needs to supply the sources you're referring to.

John 1:3b ..without him was not any thing made that was made.

The Bible explains that God created everything. Not everything except cancer. Everything. I've posted evidence that God is Jesus who created everything and just to make sure no-one thinks it's a special magic everything excluding cancer and for all I know ebola or tsutsugamushi fever, He goes out of His way make it clear!

You see, if I'm wrong and God's nature is somehow opposed to making and/or giving people cancer, leprosy, brain lesions and so on then my eternity is at risk. Because if your claim is correct maybe I'm wrong about Jesus, too. Perhaps He only died for people who worship enormous brass elephants or who spend intervals more-or-less nude & off their onions as temple prostitutes? This also contradicts The Bible (as I see it) so if I'm actually ineligible for everlasting praise of Jesus telling Him how wonderful He is for ever and ever and then singing about His Perfect Love and telling Him how wonderful He is, it's something I need to know.

So that's your next post.

[James Hutchins]

Re: It's me again

Men don't wear tutus they wear tights or sometimes tight pants and a shirt. Are you sure you weren't looking at a women's class or mixed class?

No, I am well of what I saw. Many a time I've flipped on of you queersexuals over on the back to check the gender, just like you do with a rabbit or water fowl.

[James Hutchins]

Re: It's me again

I think, dear, that Brother Hutchins is old enough and experienced enough to know the difference! Are you?


Brother James, do you think you could have inadvertently strayed into a TRANSwomen's class? One has to be so very, very careful these days: it is as though Deuteronomy 22:5 had never been written.

With the way kids are today, what with that loud music and kooky clothing, it could of been anything. For all I know, it was a catlick preparatory school.
I've heard the stories about young people 'identifying' with other genders. So do I, I see a man or a woman, I can identify the gender. But kids today, you have to flip them over to check. As I often tell the police when I am unjustly accused (thanks Obama) of assaulting some little effeminate unChristian punk, "I just was not sure if I should hold the door for them". Heaven forbid I am not socially correct in these Topsy-turvy times.

[OneFailure]

Re: It's me again

I think, dear, that Brother Hutchins is old enough and experienced enough to know the difference! Are you?


Brother James, do you think you could have inadvertently strayed into a TRANSwomen's class? One has to be so very, very careful these days: it is as though Deuteronomy 22:5 had never been written.

He probably could have. That's the most possible explanation for what he said that he saw

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: It's me again

He probably could have. That's the most possible explanation for what he said that he saw

What do you mean, "what he said that he saw"? Are you daring to question the veracity of a True Christian(tm)? Or are you casting doubt on his eyesight? If Brother James Hutchins tells us that he saw something, then rest assured that he saw it!

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

You really need to wake up. Hell is not somewhere nice with ice-cream and the store room open so you can all get dressed up and prance about licking toffee-apples. How many times do you need to be asked where you're getting your information about the loathsome furry cult? It's no use sloping off into a different thread:

Furries are not bad. How many times do I have to keep saying this

I'd already asked you for your source about The Bible being wrong (according to you) and you just fire off more rubbish about furry not being bad? This grotesque abomination starts calling itself "otherkin" and seeking plural partnerships with dragon- or frog- or transgenderhorse-obsessed lunatics as though it were normal? Parents who are "really" pink wolves turning up at schools complaining that their pups are required to eat cooked meat?

THIS IS ABNORMAL.

It leads to HELL FOREVER.

The Bible is clear. I have posted my sources which come directly from God. Not made up by me after sampling the absinthe punch. Not taken from H. C Andersen or The Brothers Grimm. And certainly not after doing a survey at the local furry convention. If there is one. Which there isn't. If you're going to persist in contradicting God, how can you say that is not evil? And since you keep going on about furries, how can you show that furries are not evil?

How many times do you need to be asked?

Please show us where The Bible is wrong or, if it isn't, where our understanding of what God has spelled out went off the rails.

[OneFailure]

Re: It's me again

What do you mean, "what he said that he saw"? Are you daring to question the veracity of a True Christian™? Or are you casting doubt on his eyesight? If Brother James Hutchins tells us that he saw something, then rest assured that he saw it!

I'm just saying that its unlikely as I've never seen or heard aknethi g like that, but if men were really wearing tutus in a ballet class then they should have been kicked out as its against the dress code of ballet schools for men to wear that outfit during ballet class