X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Virginia Day Templeton
    replied
    Re: Hello

    It made you feel nice to contract syphilis and a host of other foul diseases?

    I guess that is the definition of masochism.

    Leave a comment:


  • Miss Hikari
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by ayerea View Post
    My name is Brooke. Nice to meet you all. Im 15 years old, live in arizona. and im a Transsexual =] (male to female) I'm also bi, and Wiccan
    (in all seriousness, i am)
    I know you all see me as im going to hell.
    But ya know what, who really cares? Maybe hell is one kinky S&M party?
    now that would be cool. but just to let you know, im not here to act stupid, im pretty lagit. Just totally opposit from all of you and i think people like you are the downfall of our world. but whatever =]

    Go hug a tree and a gay today!
    much love <3
    ~Brooke~
    (i like ninjas)
    I did both. Made me feel nice.
    And hopefully you're right. S&M Party!
    And ninjas are super cool. Sexy no Jutsu!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    So instead of offering the mob his daughters, why didn't he ask his god for help? Why didn't the angels simply defend themselves and their host?
    Have you read the story?

    Its in Genesis 19

    The angels acted as though they didn't know what was going on. If you look in verse 6, it says Lot talked to them outside his house "and shut the door after him". So when he offered his daughters, he did it without the angels being able to hear.

    In verse 11, after the bad men refused the daughters, the visitors smote the bad men with blindness.

    You should really read the subject matter before you go and ask foolish questions.

    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    You are a hypocrite.

    You accept people who do "alternative" things, like gender-reassignment, and homosexuality, but you do not approve of people who believe and follow the Bible (kjv1611).

    You say you practice tolerance, but that only lasts so long as someone does the exact same thing as you.

    You are worse than what you think we are. We know that we are special/saved. You think you are special, because you are accepting, but you ONLY accept things that go with your belief.

    If you want to be tolerant, actually BE tolerant.

    I know what I am. I AM what I think I am.

    Maybe someday you might be what you think you are.

    Again...

    YOU=hypocrite

    V
    I accept that you believe what you believe, even though I don't believe it. I don't accept that you think you have the right to harm other people because of your beliefs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    Thanks. I like you too.
    While I can't say that I understand what it feels like to be TG, I know from a friend of mine who is f-to-m that it goes to one's core. He was always male in gender, even when he was a little girl, and was not really happy until he had his reassignment.
    You do what you have to do in order to live as who you really are. I respect people who have the courage to do that rather than pretend to be something they aren't just to fit everyone else's preconceived notions.
    You are a hypocrite.

    You accept people who do "alternative" things, like gender-reassignment, and homosexuality, but you do not approve of people who believe and follow the Bible (kjv1611).

    You say you practice tolerance, but that only lasts so long as someone does the exact same thing as you.

    You are worse than what you think we are. We know that we are special/saved. You think you are special, because you are accepting, but you ONLY accept things that go with your belief.

    If you want to be tolerant, actually BE tolerant.

    I know what I am. I AM what I think I am.

    Maybe someday you might be what you think you are.

    Again...

    YOU=hypocrite

    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    Had Lot not offered his daughters to the men, Genesis 19: 8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof. and instead turned the angels over to the men, then Lot and his family would have all been killed the next day too, instead of being spared.

    Do you consider letting your family live to see the next day, an act of compassion, or would you rather have your family consumed by fire and brimstone?

    BTW, the men didn't want the girls, and Lot probably knew that, so that's probably why he offered them as a substitute.

    Hope this helps
    YIC
    V
    So instead of offering the mob his daughters, why didn't he ask his god for help? Why didn't the angels simply defend themselves and their host?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    If that's what you see as fatherly love, I pity your children if you ever breed.
    Had Lot not offered his daughters to the men, Genesis 19: 8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof. and instead turned the angels over to the men, then Lot and his family would have all been killed the next day too, instead of being spared.

    Do you consider letting your family live to see the next day, an act of compassion, or would you rather have your family consumed by fire and brimstone?

    BTW, the men didn't want the girls, and Lot probably knew that, so that's probably why he offered them as a substitute.

    Hope this helps
    YIC
    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by ayerea View Post
    I totally agree.
    By the way, i like you =] At least theres one other person on this forum who has a brain.
    Thanks. I like you too.
    While I can't say that I understand what it feels like to be TG, I know from a friend of mine who is f-to-m that it goes to one's core. He was always male in gender, even when he was a little girl, and was not really happy until he had his reassignment.
    You do what you have to do in order to live as who you really are. I respect people who have the courage to do that rather than pretend to be something they aren't just to fit everyone else's preconceived notions.

    Leave a comment:


  • ayerea
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    If that's what you see as fatherly love, I pity your children if you ever breed.
    I totally agree.
    By the way, i like you =] At least theres one other person on this forum who has a brain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    Friend; how does Lot offering his two daughters to a crowd of strangers to rape senseless lead you to conclude that he didn't care about them? It seems like a perfectly admirable act of fatherly love to me.
    If that's what you see as fatherly love, I pity your children if you ever breed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    Two angels would have been able to defend themselves against mere mortals, wouldn't they? Then again, Jacob was able to beat one down, so maybe they're not so much after all.
    Maybe Lot felt obligated to protect them because he was their host. No doubt in the kind of dog eat dog Darwnist nightmare you live in a guest in your house would count him self lucky if he wasn't robed and killed in his sleep but in Lot's day being a host carried serious obligations.

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    My gripe with Lot is that he didn't care a rat's ass about his children.
    Why should he; look at the spawn of their polluted mommy caves; the Moabites and the Ammonites. If Lot had tossed the two harlots to the crowd like he wanted to then a lot of trouble would have been spared in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    Two angels would have been able to defend themselves against mere mortals, wouldn't they? Then again, Jacob was able to beat one down, so maybe they're not so much after all.
    My gripe with Lot is that he didn't care a rat's ass about his children.
    Friend; how does Lot offering his two daughters to a crowd of strangers to rape senseless lead you to conclude that he didn't care about them? It seems like a perfectly admirable act of fatherly love to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Oh so all of a sudden when it comes to a woman they whole cultural context gets thrown out the window. I am curious why you just blow off the entire town was out to ass raped two men on the grounds they were good looking. It seems more like what you ready want to read in The Bible is a graphic description two of The Lord’s angels get forcibly sodomized. Your’ real gripe with Lot is his selfless effort to protect his guests he denied you a moment of vicarious pleasure of reading of the righteous being abused.

    The Bible is Holy Word of God(r) and not your private snuff porn collection harlot.
    Two angels would have been able to defend themselves against mere mortals, wouldn't they? Then again, Jacob was able to beat one down, so maybe they're not so much after all.
    My gripe with Lot is that he didn't care a rat's ass about his children.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    The fact that it was legal for him to hand his children over to a mob with the blessing of "do with them as you wish" does not make him righteous for being willing to do so. But then again, that whole family was a bit loony.
    Oh so all of a sudden when it comes to a woman they whole cultural context gets thrown out the window. I am curious why you just blow off the entire town was out to ass raped two men on the grounds they were good looking. It seems more like what you ready want to read in The Bible is a graphic description two of The Lord’s angels get forcibly sodomized. Your’ real gripe with Lot is his selfless effort to protect his guests he denied you a moment of vicarious pleasure of reading of the righteous being abused.

    The Bible is Holy Word of God(r) and not your private snuff porn collection harlot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Hello

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Show us in The Bible were God says that. At the very lest with your liberal relativism you have to accept since it was the social custom in Lot's day that children were conspired the property of the father Lot was behaving properly.
    The fact that it was legal for him to hand his children over to a mob with the blessing of "do with them as you wish" does not make him righteous for being willing to do so. But then again, that whole family was a bit loony.

    Leave a comment:

Working...