[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

Atheism fails to meet every point of the definition of religion that you offered. Are you going to make up a new definition of religion now?

And it's not much of a "religion" if "you do what you want to do, or you don't".

Frankly, I don't think you're an atheist at all. At least not according to Wickedpedia:



A religion is a belief system. Atheism is the rejection of belief.

Again.
Religion: a widely believed-in subject, by a group of people. It can be used both ways. So said my Religion teacher. You must not be a very good "Reverend" if you can't even try to stretch the definition of Religion to see my point of view. I am an Atheist, and who cares about wickedpedia? Really? What does it have to do with anything?

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

The creator of the universe is not "reality?"

How naive is that!

You still think God is the creator of the universe?
How naive.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Hello.

Science most certainly does not "guess." They prove it with reality, they don't take utter bullshit from a book and believe it. They do experiments and prove the theories.

So everything a scientist says is true right?

What about the planet Vulcan?
Spontaneous generation?
The expanding earth?
Phlogiston theory?
Ether?
Martian canals?
Blank slate theory?
Phrenology?
Einsteins static universe?
Cold fusion?
Bucky balls?
Newtons law of Motion?
Pluto?
The periodic table of elements?

All of these have "respected scientists" who say they're wrong.

God is not reality. You're so naive.

Of course you can prove this?

Theories are all you have. Theories are all I have. You have no proof whatsoever that the Bible is true. There's no way to prove it.

Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?

And you still haven't. What else am I gonna say? Theories are all anyone has. You have no REAL proof that he exists, and I don't have much REAL proof he doesn't. But you still didn't acknowledge my arguments, most likely because you know they were right,

No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.

and you're reverting to immaturity like "DERP, WHAT A TYPICAL ATHEIST," and changing my username from "Can you justify that" to "Can I justify that." Really, how immature of you.

Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.

How old are you all? Age your god damn age.

I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?

Ridiculing me by changing my posts, my name, and to say my location is "worshiping monkies," REALLY? Grow up. Every one of you. None of you can actually give me a head-to-head argument about why they think I'm wrong.

Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.

Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory, and try to prove it wrong.

Which specific "theory" are you talking about?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hello.

No, there are no rules. You do want you want to do. Or you don't. It really doesn't matter. It's an open religion. Sure, there's requirements to be an Atheist, but there's requirements for everything religion in order to be a part of it.

Atheism fails to meet every point of the definition of religion that you offered. Are you going to make up a new definition of religion now?

And it's not much of a "religion" if "you do what you want to do, or you don't".

Frankly, I don't think you're an atheist at all. At least not according to Wickedpedia:

Atheism, in a broad sense, is the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[2] Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.[3] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[4] which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.

A religion is a belief system. Atheism is the rejection of belief.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Hello.

God is not reality. You're so naive.

The creator of the universe is not "reality?"

How naive is that!

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

No, science guesses at things and hopes they are right. Reality proves things are what they are. God is reality. You did a total fail at the Gauntlet of Challenge®. Until you succeed at that, your future questions hold no merit.

A man can not walk until he makes the first step. You need to take that first step before you can go on to the second one.

Science most certainly does not "guess." They prove it with reality, they don't take utter bullshit from a book and believe it. They do experiments and prove the theories.

God is not reality. You're so naive.

No, not happy

What part of the challange did you fail to understand?


Typical Athiest!

Theories are all you have. Theories are all I have. You have no proof whatsoever that the Bible is true. There's no way to prove it. And you still haven't. What else am I gonna say? Theories are all anyone has. You have no REAL proof that he exists, and I don't have much REAL proof he doesn't. But you still didn't acknowledge my arguments, most likely because you know they were right, and you're reverting to immaturity like "DERP, WHAT A TYPICAL ATHEIST," and changing my username from "Can you justify that" to "Can I justify that." Really, how immature of you. How old are you all? Age your god damn age. Ridiculing me by changing my posts, my name, and to say my location is "worshiping monkies," REALLY? Grow up. Every one of you. None of you can actually give me a head-to-head argument about why they think I'm wrong.

Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory, and try to prove it wrong.

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: Hello.

No, science guesses at things and hopes they are right. Reality proves things are what they are. God is reality. You did a total fail at the Gauntlet of Challenge®. Until you succeed at that, your future questions hold no merit.

A man can not walk until he makes the first step. You need to take that first step before you can go on to the second one.

Amen Brother! That is what I was saying all yesterday, but he just kept side-stepping and avoided the issue.

Atheists, especially the "know it all" sciency ones, are in denial of reality.

YIC

Sister Phebe.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Hello.

So you're saying you don't believe in SCIENCE. Things that are PROVED with SCIENCE.
Nice going.




It's only valid because of your religion. Only the people of your religion can accept it as proof. The Bible hasn't been proved. The Bible is simply text and writing. Give me real proof, proof how it's not just a fairytale. The first real book ever written.

No, science guesses at things and hopes they are right. Reality proves things are what they are. God is reality. You did a total fail at the Gauntlet of Challenge(r). Until you succeed at that, your future questions hold no merit.

A man can not walk until he makes the first step. You need to take that first step before you can go on to the second one.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Hello.

What proof do you have that God does not exist? And do not respond by asking me to prove he does. I asked you FIRST since your threw down the Gauntlet of Challenge®. You cannot use theories or guess. concrete irrefutable proof.

The reason I replied with a question is because YOU can't prove it either. But; here are some theories I have come up with myself to prove that God doesn't exist.

<<<<<<<<<<<< Wacked out theories >>>>>>>>>>>> Happy?

No, not happy

What part of the challange did you fail to understand?


Typical Athiest!

[Lisa H]

Re: Hello.

No, there are no rules. You do want you want to do. Or you don't. It really doesn't matter. It's an open religion. Sure, there's requirements to be an Atheist, but there's requirements for everything religion in order to be a part of it.

If there are no rules, then why are there requirements. Requirements are rules.

If I can do what I want as an atheist, then I can still be a Christian.

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

Answer this simple question.

Is there rules for atheism Yes or No.

No, there are no rules. You do want you want to do. Or you don't. It really doesn't matter. It's an open religion. Sure, there's requirements to be an Atheist, but there's requirements for everything religion in order to be a part of it.

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

Can I justify that cracks me up. Making so many guess and interestingly, "prayers of hope" that these 'scientific theories' are correct. Time and time again, most theories have been eventually proven false. However, the Bible has remained steadfast with no change , Ever! That alone should tell you something.
Theories are guess of explanations, the Bible has no guesses. It tells it like it was and is. There are no 'Maybes' in the Bible.
I look out my window in the middle of the day and see light. A scientist might 'theorize' I left the floodlights on or maybe the sun is shinning. He does not know, he is guessing. Believing in God, I know enough to see the Truth® so I simply go outside and see for myself. So where the 'scientist' is guessing, I know the fact. Just like the Bible. The Truth®.
So, as a 'scientist' you better pray your guess is correct because if you are wrong, you will be mighty sorry.

So you're saying you don't believe in SCIENCE. Things that are PROVED with SCIENCE.
Nice going.

Not following rules & regulations is rebellious or lawless, not atheism. If Christians cannot be atheists then it must be a law. What is so hard to understand about that. You were the one that said atheism was a religion, so admit you are following religious laws.

Why cannot you accept the Bible has been written over a long period of time by different people, and is valid proof. According to your scientific theory models, it counts as valid proof. Funny how you would accept data from your scientists presented in the same way, but not the Bible.

It's only valid because of your religion. Only the people of your religion can accept it as proof. The Bible hasn't been proved. The Bible is simply text and writing. Give me real proof, proof how it's not just a fairytale. The first fictional book ever written.

[Lisa H]

Re: Hello.

What? How old are you? 12?
>lets you
>can

It doesn't say you HAVE TO do any of those things, or there will be a consequence. It doesn't say you have to do any of those things period.

Answer this simple question.

Is there rules for atheism Yes or No.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hello.

I love how you took that from a stupid Christianity diss picture.
But no, there wasn't nothing. As I've explained, it was a huge ball, or whatever the shape was, and it exploded spreading across the universe.

And where did this "huge ball" come from? It had to come from somewhere, didn't it? Or are you saying it "always existed", then after an eternity, randomly exploded?

That makes no sense at all.

I already have. Read my posts.

No, you have never provided any scientific reference claiming that a "huge ball" exploded, flinging life forms across the universe. In fact, I will wager you $100 in tithe to Landover Baptist Church (loser tithes the $100) that you cannot find any such scientific reference which claims life forms were flung from an exploding "huge ball", then clung to meteors in the vacuum of space until landing on planets.

As I've already quoted, a religion is something that a group of people believe in. In this case, a mass belief of something that ISN'T.

Then why do all atheists besides you say that atheism is, as the etymology of the word would suggest, a lack of belief?

1. Cause of the universe? Whatever theory you want to believe in. Atheism lets you make your own connections, there's no "instruction guide." You can make your own beliefs and rules. And again, we're only human. We don't know EXACTLY how the universe was created. The best theory so far is the Big Bang, so that.

Nature? Just the logic and physics explained by science.

Purpose? None. It is, after all, inanimate. It's a wide open space. It's not supposed to support life, or even ANYTHING, but it just so happens that it does.

Really, this sounds like what you believe, not what all atheists believe. You said atheism is a religion. You defined religion. Now you are saying that atheism does not fit your own definition of religion.

2. The only "supernatural" thing that Atheists may believe in are aliens. Not the "illegal aliens," ones who have illegally migrated, but real aliens. And most atheists are smart enough not to believe in the stereotypical alien and UFO. But just living somewhere in another solar system on a planet. Even if they're tiny, or don't operate like we do at all. Though they do not at all "worship" anything.

Many atheists believe in ghosts. Being an atheist means only that they claim not to believe in GODS.

What exactly would be supernatural about extraterrestrials? In fact, to an atheist, who thinks life evolved on its own, it would be silly NOT to believe that there is life on other planets.

3. N/A

N/A? Your very own definition of a religion is that it includes rituals and observances. Now you say atheism has none. How can it be a religion?

4. Two main things, basically the same.

-Don't believe in any God
-Don't follow any other religion, if it's a God or not

You're welcome!

That's not a moral code. A moral code explains what is right and wrong, and teaches people how to behave.

Actually, your answer demonstrates something I've said literally hundreds of times: Atheists have no morals. You don't even know what a moral code IS!

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

Is another rule for atheists. There seems to be a lot of rules for something that has no rules.

From this "rule" Christians can be atheists.

What? How old are you? 12?
>lets you
>can

It doesn't say you HAVE TO do any of those things, or there will be a consequence. It doesn't say you have to do any of those things period.