[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

1. I absolutely hate arrogant assholes who refer to themselves in the third person. Always a sign of some sort of mental instability.

2. I submit to my husband, my father and my pastor, in THAT order. Do you really think women should submit to every man that demands it of them? Should I submit to a rapist? To someone who wants to rob my home? To someone who wants to molest my children?

Men who demand all women submit are weaklings who are scared of REAL women. Perhaps you should read about women in the Bible and ask yourself if Deborah should have just submitted to the Canaanites. What about the woman in Proverbs 31, should she have submitted to everyone she had to deal with in her buying and selling? No she submitted only to her husband and was praised for it. In fact she is described as "her price is far above rubies".

I apologize to the pastors and True Christian™ men on this board, I usually keep this side of myself under wraps. I'm just tired of these children (I don't care what their age is, mentally they're children) who think they can just through a temper tantrum and a Christian woman is supposed to do their bidding. They're not willing to take up the standard of a Christian man.

see

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=16536&highlight=punish+wife

I'm just going by what I see here.

[Stella LaForte]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Listen, Deepak Chopra, thinking for yourself is what led to original sin in the first place. If Eve would've just blindly followed God's commandment to not eat from the Tree of Knowledge, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place.

It's best to listen to God and not yourself! (Psalm 37:23, Proverbs 16:9)

Please read this AMAZING SERMON by our Pastor Billy-Reuben why we need to follow the Bible, not our conscience.

Ah, I'm afraid I'm no Deepak Chopra, although I do admire his utilisation of modern quantum mechanics in traditional spiritualism. And I do agree with you- thinking for oneself does lead to straying off the beaten path and finding one's one way, but you seem to think of it as a bad thing. I cou;d not disagree more. The very existence of our civilisation as we know it today is predicated upon the tenacity of our ancestors, the ones who did think for themselves, the ones who decided the fate of our world. And you say we should not follow our conscience either. However, if God did decide to give humans the aptitude, faculty, intuition, and judgment of the intellect that distinguishes right from wrong, why would he intend for us not to use it? Saying that God-given conscience ought not be employed is the same as saying that God-given limbs ought not be utilised in locomotion!

[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Sorry for double posting, but also see

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=41240

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=54668

For any other grievances, please post and I shall resolve posthaste.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Salutations benefactors

see

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=16536&highlight=punish+wife

I'm just going by what I see here.

I'm not sure what your argument is. Where does it say in that thread to "submit to a rapist"? The girl was refusing to submit to her father.

Trust me, anyone tries to rape me and if both of us survive, He will be easily identifiable because he will be missing body parts and be clawed beyond recognition.

But being unsaved trash you don't have the Holy Ghost to help you discern such subjects.

Sorry for double posting, but also see

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=41240

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=54668

For any other grievances, please post and I shall resolve posthaste.

Brother Cranky is a senior and well respected member of the church. I do not submit to him. If he has an issue with something I'm doing he can take it up with my husband and let my husband handle the correction. Again, still not seeing where I should submit to any idiot who comes down the pipes.

[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Are you siding with the girl?

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Look Davidson, on this forum the hierarchy is as follows:

• God and Jesus
• Pastors like myself
• True Christian(tm) men
• True Christian(tm) women like BelieverInGod
• Forum member men
• Forum member women
• Unsaved scum like yourself

Know your role. You're on the bottom of the ladder. You have no room to tell any woman here what to do and if you attempt to usurp any True Christian(tm) lady's authority here, you will find me having to exercise my authority. Do we have an understanding?

[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Apparently not. In no way am I suggesting that I am superior to anyone here, let alone any of the women. I posted those threads because someone wanted me to clarify the point I was trying to make on the first page. Any misinterpretations, I am terribly sorry for, but I thought my intentions were quite obvious. For the record.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Are you siding with the girl?

The Girl was raped
Deuteronomy 22 says she must marry her rapist
She was not willing to obey her father
There lay the problem

Since the issue started 2 years ago, she has now married the man and have more children. So yes I am siding with the girl since she obeyed God and her Father and is now a happily married woman.

You seem to think that all women should submit to you. Well that isn't true. The Bible says we must submit to our Fathers, then our Husbands and always to our Pastors. There are specific rules as to who you obey. If I believe my Husband was doing something ungodly then it is quite alright for me to approach the Pastors to discuss the issue. Not to complain but to ask for guidance. However if another church man has an issue with me, they have no right to rebuke me (unless they're a pastor). They can approach my husband, or can approach a pastor and ask them to approach my husband. But if my Husband says turn left and the pastor says turn right, I will turn left.

I'm not sure why you are having such a problem with understanding organizational hierarchies.

[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

The Girl was raped
Deuteronomy 22 says she must marry her rapist
She was not willing to obey her father
There lay the problem

Since the issue started 2 years ago, she has now married the man and have more children. So yes I am siding with the girl since she obeyed God and her Father and is now a happily married woman.

You seem to think that all women should submit to you. Well that isn't true. The Bible says we must submit to our Fathers, then our Husbands and always to our Pastors. There are specific rules as to who you obey. If I believe my Husband was doing something ungodly then it is quite alright for me to approach the Pastors to discuss the issue. Not to complain but to ask for guidance. However if another church man has an issue with me, they have no right to rebuke me (unless they're a pastor). They can approach my husband, or can approach a pastor and ask them to approach my husband. But if my Husband says turn left and the pastor says turn right, I will turn left.

I'm not sure why you are having such a problem with understanding organizational hierarchies.

I'm not sure why people are trying to read between the lines. My words are pretty explicit. Any implicit meanings are completely subjective, and not emphasized by myself. I hope none of you are trying to project your subconscious thoughts onto my explicit words because that's another form of perversion. Please keep my words pure. Thanks in advance.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Well, assuming they're not killed off or don't naturally revert to normal, if they wish to do woman-like things, they ought to be subordinate to real men. At least, how David Davidson sees it.

So apparently you want your sodomite friend to submit to you, is that it?

You're wanting to make him your "bitch", and you think that you can find a Biblical justification for using him as your personal sex slave/cumbucket.

You want to have him at your feet, worshipping you the way you should be worshipping Jesus, begging for you to "inject him with your love"!

The perversions you sickos come up with thoroughly disgust me.

Why did you join this forum? Are you actually thinking you will get Biblical justification for your perverted homo-rape master-slave fantasies? Or are you just here to try to shock and disgust us?

Not shocked. Thoroughly disgusted.

[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

So apparently you want your sodomite friend to submit to you, is that it?

You're wanting to make him your "bitch", and you think that you can find a Biblical justification for using him as your personal sex slave/cumbucket.

You want to have him at your feet, worshipping you the way you should be worshipping Jesus, begging for you to "inject him with your love"!

The perversions you sickos come up with thoroughly disgust me.

Why did you join this forum? Are you actually thinking you will get Biblical justification for your perverted homo-rape master-slave fantasies? Or are you just here to try to shock and disgust us?

Not shocked. Thoroughly disgusted.

Firstly, see my previous comment posted right above yours. It holds true to your own to some degree. Secondly, you're implying that having a subordinate is only for perverted, sexual purposes. If that were the case, then your entire hierarchy has a sexual undertone (for reasons I cannot even fathom; I'm just following your logic). Please do not look for sexual stuff in my words...I'd like to keep them pure mates.

[Janine Walker]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Firstly, see my previous comment posted right above yours. It holds true to your own to some degree. Secondly, you're implying that having a subordinate is only for perverted, sexual purposes. If that were the case, then your entire hierarchy has a sexual undertone (for reasons I cannot even fathom; I'm just following your logic). Please do not look for sexual stuff in my words...I'd like to keep them pure mates.

Also, to punish the righteous is not good, nor to strike princes for their uprightness. He who has knowledge spares his words, and a man of understanding is of a calm fool

FULL OF CHRISTmas JOY, JANINE WALKER

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Salutations benefactors

Firstly, see my previous comment posted right above yours. It holds true to your own to some degree. Secondly, you're implying that having a subordinate is only for perverted, sexual purposes. If that were the case, then your entire hierarchy has a sexual undertone (for reasons I cannot even fathom; I'm just following your logic). Please do not look for sexual stuff in my words...I'd like to keep them pure mates.

I can't even bring myself to comment on this . . . this latest steaming pile of perversion and depravity.

May God have mercy on your sodomy-addled soul.

[David_Davidson]

Re: Salutations benefactors

I can't even bring myself to comment on this . . . this latest steaming pile of perversion and depravity.

May God have mercy on your sodomy-addled soul.

You did it again. You guys should really stop with that...