New here

[Gill Torn]

I have a question that I've yet to see explained, I was wondering if perhaps someone here could help.

Now, you say that the earth was created roughly 4000 years ago. Adam and Eve lived to the ripe ages of 930sih. Their children lived shorter lifetimes, and their children even shorter, until around 0 A.D. when people died in their mid 30's.

Written language and documentation dates back to about 3900 years ago, in an entirely separate region of the world. So there's a physical documentation and tracking back to the time where adam and eve were alive, albeit old, in a separate region of the earth.

Is it possible, after adam and eve ate the apple, god was displeased, cast them out of the garden, and went elsewhere to make a better garden with a smarter people?

[James Hutchins]

Re: New here

I have a question that I've yet to see explained, I was wondering if perhaps someone here could help.

Now, you say that the earth was created roughly 4000 years ago. Adam and Eve lived to the ripe ages of 930sih. Their children lived shorter lifetimes, and their children even shorter, until around 0 A.D. when people died in their mid 30's.

Written language and documentation dates back to about 3900 years ago, in an entirely separate region of the world. So there's a physical documentation and tracking back to the time where adam and eve were alive, albeit old, in a separate region of the earth.

Is it possible, after adam and eve ate the apple, god was displeased, cast them out of the garden, and went elsewhere to make a better garden with a smarter people?

Nope, not a chance.
If what you propose were not some wild fantasy but truly happened, it would be documented in the Bible.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: New here

Now, you say that the earth was created roughly 4000 years ago.

Nobody here has ever made such a ridiculous claim! No, friend, between the Bible and REAL science, the age of the earth has been placed somewhere between 6000-10,000 years old, MUCH more ancient than 4000 years old!

[Gill Torn]

Re: New here

Hi Alvin, that was a humerous article at theonion, a place i frequent for amusement. However, they are simply just that, amusement.

The many worlds theory is something i'm very familiar with, being an astrophysisist and quantum theorist, but i can say for a fact that the many worlds theory is fundamentally incorrect on some of it's key elements. For example, a universe is created out of a void which contains no time, space, or mass. Once mass is created, a bubble of space is created around it, and with mass and space, time comes into existence. Now, this can happen an infinite amount of times. That theory implies that a new universe is created every time a decision is made, playing off one of my old theories that, given infinite time, anything that can happen will happen, and anything that will happen, has already happened. I've already proved that time is not infinite, as time is a concept which does not exist without space for it to elapse in, and at one point there was no space, so time definitely had a starting point.

[Sam Diamond]

Re: New here

Hi Alvin, that was a humerous article at theonion, a place i frequent for amusement. However, they are simply just that, amusement.

The many worlds theory is something i'm very familiar with, being an astrophysisist and quantum theorist, but i can say for a fact that the many worlds theory is fundamentally incorrect on some of it's key elements. For example, a universe is created out of a void which contains no time, space, or mass. Once mass is created, a bubble of space is created around it, and with mass and space, time comes into existence. Now, this can happen an infinite amount of times. That theory implies that a new universe is created every time a decision is made, playing off one of my old theories that, given infinite time, anything that can happen will happen, and anything that will happen, has already happened. I've already proved that time is not infinite, as time is a concept which does not exist without space for it to elapse in, and at one point there was no space, so time definitely had a starting point.

Who the heck is Alvin?

[Gill Torn]

Re: New here

Who the heck is Alvin?

Strange, there was a post after James' but before the woman's that has disappeared, that i was responding to. Not sure what happened there.

[Youth Minister Harry]

Re: New here

Strange, there was a post after James' but before the woman's that has disappeared, that i was responding to. Not sure what happened there.

Put down the crack brownies and the mushroom needle and pick up a Bible for Christ's sake (or YOUR sake)! You've been studying Satan's lies for too long and you need to cast off your old ways. If you applied your study time to REAL science as taught in the Bible, you wouldn't need the drugs to cope with reality.

High On The Blood Of The Infant Savior,
Harry Lester

[Bible Student]

Re: New here

I have a question that I've yet to see explained, I was wondering if perhaps someone here could help.

Now, you say that the earth was created roughly 4000 years ago. Adam and Eve lived to the ripe ages of 930sih. Their children lived shorter lifetimes, and their children even shorter, until around 0 A.D. when people died in their mid 30's.

Written language and documentation dates back to about 3900 years ago, in an entirely separate region of the world. So there's a physical documentation and tracking back to the time where adam and eve were alive, albeit old, in a separate region of the earth.

Is it possible, after adam and eve ate the apple, god was displeased, cast them out of the garden, and went elsewhere to make a better garden with a smarter people?

What do you mean by "cast them out of the garden?" God did no such thing. Go back and read your Bible again, this time with comprehension. Atheists, Catolicks, Fluffy Bunny Christians and Cafeteria Christians always get that verse wrong.

[Bible Student]

Re: New here

Hi Alvin, that was a humerous article at theonion, a place i frequent for amusement. However, they are simply just that, amusement.

The many worlds theory is something i'm very familiar with, being an astrophysisist and quantum theorist, but i can say for a fact that the many worlds theory is fundamentally incorrect on some of it's key elements. For example, a universe is created out of a void which contains no time, space, or mass. Once mass is created, a bubble of space is created around it, and with mass and space, time comes into existence. Now, this can happen an infinite amount of times. That theory implies that a new universe is created every time a decision is made, playing off one of my old theories that, given infinite time, anything that can happen will happen, and anything that will happen, has already happened. I've already proved that time is not infinite, as time is a concept which does not exist without space for it to elapse in, and at one point there was no space, so time definitely had a starting point.

"The many worlds theory is something i'm very familiar with, being an astrophysisist and quantum theorist" and yet you don't know enough to capitalize the pronoun "I"? And I hate to tell you this but your explanation about multiple universes is wrong. It has nothing to do with decisions. And that is just the start of your posturing. Next we will see you claiming that you have an IQ of 140 or something, ten black belts in the martial arts, and a 16 inch tallywhacker.

[Youth Minister Harry]

Re: New here

... black belts in the martial arts, and a 16 inch tallywhacker.

I think he could benefit from some private discipline in a secluded prayer loft or youth retreat. Maybe I should call up Brother Rebuko for some help with this one...

Excited by The Blood Of The Holy Savior,
Harry Lester