Why the Crusades were Ideal

[BlessTheSaviour]

A long time ago, God and our saviour inspired our great Pope to start a war to save the peoples of the nation of Middle East. We sent our armies carrying God's love, but the devil himself manifested in these peasants and they fought back. However our victory seemed undeniable with the Lord himself unleashing his wrath through our brave warriors. We tried to save them but Lucifer had embedded himself within these inferiors too deep and they could not be saved.

But today, we have a new chance! We have evermore troops in MiddleEast and the oppurtunity arises to try to bring these lowly apes to the love and light of a Christian community. We should send in more troops, more jets and more tanks in order to peacefully bring the unclean to a state of belief in the true Lord, a community of those partnered with Jesus Christ himself, and one with rules and commandments such as our civilised selves. Why, these MiddleEastians don't even know how to train and discipline their own wives in a morally correct way!

So yes. More of our armed forces could truly create the foundations of a Christian dominion. Let us act now and try to save the wretched! Our troops will bring the peaceful love of God as they did before, only with powerful tanks and jets now!

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

That's nice. Now, let's try this again.

Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

We aren't asking for much. Just some common courtesy. And please read all of our threads here before ranting on what has likely been addressed hundreds of times.

In Christ

[landoverlover]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

What kind of pie do you think is the best? Do you demand your wife bake it for you?

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

What kind of pie do you think is the best? Do you demand your wife bake it for you?

That's a good question, but I think this guy's a Papist. As such, his wife if probably just for show so people won't realize he's interested in little boys.

[BlessTheSaviour]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

That's nice. Now, let's try this again.



We aren't asking for much. Just some common courtesy. And please read all of our threads here before ranting on what has likely been addressed hundreds of times.

In Christ

I'm sorry that you feel so WEAKLY about spreading a divine wind across the arid stench of Islamic infection.

And as to the other poster, my favourite pie is a simple chicken pie. Yes - it is my wife's duty and her God-given right to make pies for me whenever she damn wants.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

That's nice. Now, let's try this again.

Quote:

Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

We aren't asking for much. Just some common courtesy. And please read all of our threads here before ranting on what has likely been addressed hundreds of times.

In Christ

...evasion blahblah avoidance blahblah...

Though Jesus instructs the faithful to forgive their brothers seventy times seven times (Matthew 18:22), YOU AIN'T THEIR BROTHER. So get on with it.

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

our great Pope

You mistake us here on some kiddie-fiddling papists.

[landoverlover]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

I'm sorry that you feel so WEAKLY about spreading a divine wind across the arid stench of Islamic infection.

And as to the other poster, my favourite pie is a simple chicken pie. Yes - it is my wife's duty and her God-given right to make pies for me whenever she damn wants.

CHICKEN pie? Foreign apostate! Pie has fruit.

[Nobar King]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

(his wife's pie tastes like chicken!)

[Bible Student]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

A long time ago, God and our saviour inspired our great Pope to start a war to save the peoples of the nation of Middle East.

Urban II wasn't a particularly large man, and in fact far from it



Why don't you try writing something about which you know?

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

Urban II wasn't a particularly large man, and in fact far from it



Why don't you try writing something about which you know?

It does make one wonder why homersexuality, depravity, and Godlessness is centered in "Urban" areas of the world doesn't it?

[Bible Student]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

It does make one wonder why homersexuality, depravity, and Godlessness is centered in "Urban" areas of the world doesn't it?

And let us not forget that they had a Peter, eight Urbans, and 32 Johns. It doesn't take a Catolick genius to see where their minds are.

[HTannor]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

And as to the other poster, my favourite pie is a simple chicken pie. Yes - it is my wife's duty and her God-given right to make pies for me whenever she damn wants.

Brothers, I sense the above statement effectively confirms our doubts about this unsaved trash. No True Christian™ would ever allow his spouse to bake a pie only she feels like it.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

And let us not forget that they had a Peter, eight Urbans, and 32 Johns. It doesn't take a Catolick genius to see where their minds are.

I'm surprised they didn't have any popes named Harry Sachs, 'cause they sure were obsessed with the pope's family jewels:

Testicle Verification Ritual for New Popes

The Roman Church, according to legend, stipulated that anyone elected Pope should prove that his genitalia were intact. To this end a special chair was fashioned that had a horseshoe-shaped seat. The Pope to be would sit on the seat and the cardinals would pass by, checking the papal procession and proclaiming: ‘testiculos habet et bene pendentes’. A loose translation being: ‘testicles he has and well-hung ones’.

[Bible Student]

Re: Why the Crusades were Ideal

Originally Posted by Bible Student
And let us not forget that they had a Peter, eight Urbans, and 32 Johns. It doesn't take a Catolick genius to see where their minds are.

I'm surprised they didn't have any popes named Harry Sachs, 'cause they sure were obsessed with the pope's family jewels:

Testicle Verification Ritual for New Popes

The Roman Church, according to legend, stipulated that anyone elected Pope should prove that his genitalia were intact. To this end a special chair was fashioned that had a horseshoe-shaped seat. The Pope to be would sit on the seat and the cardinals would pass by, checking the papal procession and proclaiming: ‘testiculos habet et bene pendentes’. A loose translation being: ‘testicles he has and well-hung ones’.

I like the spin, "according to legend." It isn't legend; it is fact. They can blame Pope Joan for that. She was one of their most brilliant popes they had but the Catoliks do not want to admit they elected a woman. The chair exists, and so do writings by those who performed the inspection as to its nature.

A few months ago I read a well written book by a Catolick nonetheless who documented the existence of Pope Joan. She had her name changed to one of the Johns after the fact. She even appears on two or the three official lists of popes the RCC kept. Note: usually one official list is good for most organizations but the Catolicks need three different ones with different popes on them. On one, Peter is the second pope.