On contrary, you're lucky no one here knows exactly where you live .
No Jack, it is a tragedy that the Department of Faith has chosen to respect Drecky's privacy to the point where they won't give me her home address. If I had that, I would be at her front door in a heartbeat, winning her soul for Jesus once and for all!
Where did you qualify to be a pastor? How about you asswipes tell me exactly why you're right and I'm wrong. Can you do that? Or are you too stupid? You people are goddamn lucky I don't know where you are right now.
If I wouldn’t follow secular laws, I would reach out through your computer screen and smack you in the face with a KJV 1611 Bible. Not out of hatred; just because you need it.
Where did you qualify to be a pastor? How about you asswipes tell me exactly why you're right and I'm wrong. Can you do that? Or are you too stupid? You people are goddamn lucky I don't know where you are right now.
We keep asking you to show us where we have misunderstood Scripture.
You keep screaming, "You're getting it wrong! You don't understand the Bible!" Yet you refuse to give even one example when asked.
So, please forgive my language, but piss off, witless twerp. We follow the God of the Bible, not the little 'god' you made up for yourself who happens to agree with you on everything.
Where did you qualify to be a pastor? How about you asswipes tell me exactly why you're right and I'm wrong. Can you do that? Or are you too stupid? You people are goddamn lucky I don't know where you are right now.
On contrary, you're lucky no one here knows exactly where you live .
You mean a bit of unsaved trash told us that we were getting the Bible wrong and then refused to explain how? I am shocked, shocked!
Where did you qualify to be a pastor? How about you asswipes tell me exactly why you're right and I'm wrong. Can you do that? Or are you too stupid? You people are goddamn lucky I don't know where you are right now.
You really expect me to tell you EVERY time you've misinterpreted the bible
I'm glad to hear that you consider The Bible to be a reliable source which can be misinterpreted (thereby applying its truths in some manner intended to deceive).
Obviously for that to happen there'd need to be a correct "interpretation" which did not deceive.
I noticed that you're studying chemistry for some reason so you'll have encountered the idea of atoms by now, I'd expect. It isn't a new idea of course and the word has quite an interesting provenance. The word chemistry also has a fascinating etymology. Recently we've been getting a review of the dialogue between the Stoics and the Epicureans on the radio and many of those ideas inform modern ethical and scientific conversations so we can see where we are ourselves positioned on the arrow of time. Is any of this stuff covered in your coursework (history and philosophy of science for example)?
You really expect me to tell you EVERY time you've misinterpreted the bible?! No. That would take WAY to long. Besides, I have better things to do than argue with imbeciles.
How about one?
Can you do one? You claim there are so many!
Or do you admit you don't know the Bible at all? That's what I'm guessing, Mr. Ad Hominem.
You really expect me to tell you EVERY time you've misinterpreted the bible?! No. That would take WAY to long. Besides, I have better things to do than argue with imbeciles.
Then tell me where we have misunderstood Scripture.
Chapter and verse, and specific examples where we are wrong.
Thanks!
You really expect me to tell you EVERY time you've misinterpreted the bible?! No. That would take WAY to long. Besides, I have better things to do than argue with imbeciles.
Leave a comment: