X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yea-tho-we-walk
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Mr Link, don't be discouraged by some of the posters here, I for one really hope you get to be a forum member here. If you make forum member, I can tell the people that I witness to, that our forum has a member that thinks he has a higher IQ than just about every other person in the world! It's not every day that I run across someone who truly believes they are smarter than most everyone else on the planet. Well, actually it is everyday, but who's keeping track. YIC

    Leave a comment:


  • Yea-tho-we-walk
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    A Little About Me

    That being said, I am not retarded. In fact, my IQ is approximately 140 putting me in the top 1% of the world. I am not conceited over that, I just don't want people getting the wrong impression.

    .
    Jack Link, I was hoping for someone that claimed to have an IQ of 150, but I suppose I'll have to settle for a guy that claims to have 140. This is a quick pic I took with my cell phone camera of a formula that I'm currently work on. The picture is probably around 1% of the entire blackboard, but it represents the problem I am working on. Could you please take a quick look and tell me what the value is for the diethical evolute of the element astatine? My kid won't be home until Sunday and I'd like to get your opinion before he gets here.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	5664247-equation-seamless.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	54.2 KB
ID:	1917032

    Leave a comment:


  • Sammy The Penitent
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Amen Brother Matthew!

    I get tired of these tards scurrying along the floor of this Sacred Forum. First of all it's their CHOICE! Then right after making this choice comes the all whining: "Help me, feed me, pay me...I'm a tard. waah."

    I say either come to the Lord or move to Cuba and live with AIDS infected pygmies.

    YIC

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Hopkins
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sammy The Penitent View Post
    Oh, hey Retard, by the way, I can't seem to remember: What's your IQ again?
    Indeed brother. Why, I myself once undertook an "IQ test". I remember feeling pride, which is a sin for which I was later punished, when the results came back as ESN. That's right, I was off the scale! My teacher told me those letters stand for Extra Specially Nifty. I still have that certificate in a drawer at home.

    YBIC

    Leave a comment:


  • Sammy The Penitent
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I'm afraid you just made quite a misinterpretation right there.
    Who the hell do you think you are barging in on this Holy Forum and start attacking everyone?

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    my IQ is approximately 140 putting me in the top 1% of the world.
    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I told you already I'm probably smarter than most people posting here. My IQ is around 140, after all.
    Oh, hey Retard, by the way, I can't seem to remember: What's your IQ again?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I have Asperger's Syndrome.
    Have you got access to firearms? Do you live anywhere near a school?

    Leave a comment:


  • Russell Holbeck
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Hello Sir Link S. I had a high IQ but not as high as yours. The test was named after a college that one of my children went to. I do not remember the name but it was in California.

    I had an accident and my IQ changed I have not had it tested again but I do not think it went up (that is a joke it did not go up). I think that worked out OK because there is a man here named Billy Bob Jenkins and he told me about Proverbs 3:5 which says:

    Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

    Billy Bob Jenkins is a very smart man. I think he is smarter than you but he has not told me his IQ so I do not know that for a fact.

    Even if you are smart there are some words in the Bible that you will have to look up like "emerods" and "matrix" so have a dictionary handy.

    Thank you.

    Rusty

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Jamar D. Dodson
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I was under the impression that people today might have an easier time reading the bible in Modern English as opposed to Middle English.
    Middle English?

    Is that a Bible for hobbits and elves? You've been watching too many Peter Jackson movies, son.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    Where does the Bible teach that God will perfectly preserve his word in the form of one seventeenth-century English translation? I can't seem to find that.
    That's because you're a retard. Read THIS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I was under the impression that people today might have an easier time reading the bible in Modern English as opposed to Middle English...
    The King James Bible (1611 version) IS NOT in Middle English.

    From Wickedpedia: "Middle English describes dialects of English in the history of the English language between the High and Late Middle Ages, or roughly during the three centuries between the late 12th and the late 15th century....The language of England as used after 1470 and up to 1650 is known as Early Modern English."

    To illustrate the differences, let's look at a passage from the Bible, first from Wycliffe's 1384 (Middle English), then the KJV1611 (Early Modern English), and finally in Modern English using the Standard King James Version (Pure Cambridge):

    Luke 8:1-3 "1 And it was don aftirward, and Jhesu made iorney by citees and castelis, prechinge and euangelysinge þe rewme of God,
    2 and twelue wiþ him; and summe wymmen þat weren heelid of wickide spiritis and syknessis, Marie, þat is clepid Mawdeleyn, of whom seuene deuelis wenten
    3 out, and Jone, þe wyf of Chuse, procuratour of Eroude, and Susanne, and manye oþere, whiche mynystriden to him of her riches."
    Luke 8:1-3 "1 And it came to passe afterward, þt he went throughout euery citie and village preaching, and shewing the glad tidings of the kingdome of God: and the twelue were with him,
    2 And certaine women which had bene healed of euill spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene out of whom went seuen deuils,
    3 And Ioanna the wife of Chuza, Herods steward, and Susanna, and many others which ministred vnto him of their substance."
    Luke 8:1-3 "1 And it came to pass afterward, that he went throughout every city and village, preaching and shewing the glad tidings of the kingdom of God: and the twelve were with him,
    2 And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils,
    3 And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance."
    As you can see the difference between the 1611 and modern versions amount to a few spelling changes, whereas the actual Middle English of the Wycliffe Bible is incomprehensible gobbledygook to most readers nowadays.

    Hope this was informative.

    references: Wycliffe 1384: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_English
    KJV 1611: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/...apter=8&verse=
    KJV Standard (Pure Cambridge): http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/...apter=8&verse=

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    Here's an interesting question.

    At what point do you know FOR SURE that when you die you will be saved and accepted by God?
    That is a wonderful question, friend, and the Bible contains its answer.

    It is necessary to believe in Christ's temporary sacrifice:

    John 3:15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
    You must repent of all sin:
    1st John 3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
    And then you can put it to the test by praying. If you are saved, God will answer your prayers categorically. If you are not, He will ignore you, and some may come true by coincidence at best.
    John 9:31

    King James Version (KJV)

    31 Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth.
    Why don't we do a little experiment to see if you are saved? Do you dwell in a mountainous region?
    Matthew 17:20

    King James Version (KJV)

    20 And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Hopkins
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    I would see that less as an interesting question and more as a crass attempt at trapping True Christians™.

    The answer is, we know from the second we accept Jesus Christ as our Savior. Simple.

    YBIC

    (And what about this "Middle English" Bible? When can I see a copy?)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sir Link S
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Here's an interesting question.

    At what point do you know FOR SURE that when you die you will be saved and accepted by God?

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Hopkins
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I was under the impression that people today might have an easier time reading the bible in Modern English as opposed to Middle English.

    Just a thought.
    I've never heard of a Bible written in Middle English; the Latin Bible was used during the middle ages.

    This sounds like the sort of exciting discovery that would require someone with a high IQ to investigate.

    I'll stick with the KJV.

    YBIC

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: A New Challenger Has Appeared...

    Originally posted by Sir Link S View Post
    I was under the impression that people today might have an easier time reading the bible in Modern English as opposed to Middle English.

    Just a thought.
    You might be interested in this sermon, Seven Easy Ways To Tell The True Bible From the False Ones.

    In the meantime, I think it would be best if you don't "spread the love of God to the broken and needy," as it is clear you are confused and needy yourself. No offense, I say this in Christian Love of course.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X