New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

[Johny Joe Hold]

England has finally caught a break. The new baby is a male, insuring many decades of Kings instead of incompetant Queens.

When this Queen started running the country it was in good shape. It had the reputation of a world power. The Queen has run it into the ground.

The U. S. surpassed England long ago with its unbroken string of male Presidents. Now, maybe England has a chance:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html

[Looney Jack]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

England has finally caught a break. The new baby is a male, insuring many decades of Kings instead of incompetant Queens.

When this Queen started running the country it was in good shape. It had the reputation of a world power. The Queen has run it into the ground.

The U. S. surpassed England long ago with its unbroken string of male Presidents. Now, maybe England has a chance:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html

The Queen doesn't run the country so it's not an issue. The royal family has no more say so in British governance than Miss America has in American governance.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

The Queen doesn't run the country so it's not an issue. The royal family has no more say so in British governance than Miss America has in American governance.

What you are saying makes no sense. If the Queen doesn't run the country, why is she called the Queen?

[A Follower]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

The Queen doesn't run the country so it's not an issue. The royal family has no more say so in British governance than Miss America has in American governance.

You'll want to read up on your country's laws my friend, you are dangerously ignorant. The queen can start wars, has to sign all laws before they can come into effect, if she deems them good for her. She hires and fires ministers (that means secretaries of state in regular English) and military officers. The list goes on and on.

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

The U. S. surpassed England long ago with its unbroken string of male Presidents. Now, maybe England has a chance:

Do we really want England to have a chance?

They're right in the corner, where we want them (?)
.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

Do we really want England to have a chance?

They're right in the corner, where we want them (?)
.

Great point, Mistress C. What I don't want is to have the all the people of England end up on our welfare rolls.

If there is a King instead of a Queen, things will be better there. Evidence proves it.

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

I don't understand the fuss about this british baby. There is only one King, as we know from the KJV1611 Holy Bible.

Revelation 17:14 "These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."

We know that Jesus will not waste His time with the lost or unfaithful british scum that deny Him.

I don't get the fascination with a worthless infant.

In Christ

[Looney Jack]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

You'll want to read up on your country's laws my friend, you are dangerously ignorant. The queen can start wars, has to sign all laws before they can come into effect, if she deems them good for her. She hires and fires ministers (that means secretaries of state in regular English) and military officers. The list goes on and on.

My country's laws?

That is all ceremonial. She has no authority whatsoever and receives an allowance to do the government's bidding. Everything she and the entire royal family does is for show. She isn't qualified to start wars, appoint government leaders or military officers. Don't be so daft.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

My country's laws?

That is all ceremonial. She has no authority whatsoever and receives an allowance to do the government's bidding. Everything she and the entire royal family does is for show. She isn't qualified to start wars, appoint government leaders or military officers. Don't be so daft.

Care to try again?

Powers of the Queen:

The power to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister
The power to appoint and dismiss other ministers.
The power to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament
The power to make war and peace
The power to command the armed forces of the United Kingdom
The power to regulate the Civil Service
The power to ratify treaties
The power to issue passports
The power to appoint bishops and archbishops of the Church of England
The power to create peers (both life peers and hereditary peers).

If the Queen pleases, she can ride in a horse carriage down Rotten Row, where others can only ride horseback. Her picture will appear on postage stamps, but she will not need them; her personal mail is franked. She can drive as fast as she likes in a car which needs no license number. She could tell her sister Princess Margaret when she could marry. She can confer Britain’s highest civilian decoration, the Order of Merit—one honour in which the Sovereign retains freedom of choice.

What Her Majesty cannot do is vote. Nor can she express any shading of political opinion in public. The Queen cannot sit in the House of Commons, although the building is royal property. She addresses the opening session of each Parliament, but she cannot write her own speech. The Queen cannot refuse to sign a bill of Parliament, and she cannot appear as a witness in court, or rent property from her subjects.

http://www.britishmonarchistsociety.org.uk/h-m-the-queen/duties-rights-and-powers-of-h-m-the-queen/

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

I don't understand the fuss about this british baby. There is only one King, as we know from the KJV1611 Holy Bible.

Revelation 17:14 "These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."

We know that Jesus will not waste His time with the lost or unfaithful british scum that deny Him.

I don't get the fascination with a worthless infant.

In Christ

Oh AMEN Brother! When a human baby can walk on water (Matthew 14:22-33), heal with spit, be inconvenienced temporarily for the sins of mankind (1 Corinthians 15:3-8), float up into the clouds and out past the atmosphere without dying (Acts 1:9-11), then I'll be impressed. Until then, he's just another sinner in need of a Savior.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

Care to try again?

The power to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister

She has not actually done this in England. Perhaps in one or two other countries? Sure. Jesus does not recognise separation of State and Government.

THE BIBLE
REVELATION 19:6 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.

What is John talking about?

ISAIAH 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

[Looney Jack]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

Care to try again?

What do you not understand about "it's a show for the public"? She has no such real power. She appoints who she is told to appoint. If she didn't like an appointee for whatever reason, no one would care. She would do what she was told and officiate the appointment. It's all nice and ceremonial.

You will never ever see the Queen lead the armed forces. Ever. Keep on believing that the British government is going to let a 87 year old lady with no experience run their military if you like. I'm sure she runs Pakistan, Canada, Australia, South Africa and all those other countries under the commonwealth seeing as she is their monarch too.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

What do you not understand about "it's a show for the public"? She has no such real power. She appoints who she is told to appoint. If she didn't like an appointee for whatever reason, no one would care. She would do what she was told and officiate the appointment. It's all nice and ceremonial.

You will never ever see the Queen lead the armed forces. Ever. Keep on believing that the British government is going to let a 87 year old lady with no experience run their military if you like. I'm sure she runs Pakistan, Canada, Australia, South Africa and all those other countries under the commonwealth seeing as she is their monarch too.

Yes, and has DISMISSED PRIME MINISTERS did you miss that bit?

The "civil list" payments (I doubt you know what you're talking about just having read Peking Communist Review and other similar unreliable sources) are in return for INCOME derived from the Crown Estate. It is suggested that, owing to public misunderstanding of the arrangement, the Civil List should be abolished and their income returned to the Royal Family. The government however would be very seriously out-of-pocket in that event and therefore continue to butress lies, the lies you believe as fact. Joke central.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

England has finally caught a break. The new baby is a male, insuring many decades of Kings instead of incompetant Queens.

When this Queen started running the country it was in good shape. It had the reputation of a world power. The Queen has run it into the ground.

In the past the future monarch would have left in a carriage or a Rolls Royce driven by the chauffer. Now William has to pick his wife and baby up in his own car and fart around fitting a baby seat. No wonder he looked emotional, the shame must have been awful. Surely they could have had a whipround for a cab?

YIC

Jack

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: New Royal Baby Has a "Pump Handle".

What do you not understand about "it's a show for the public"? She has no such real power.

But that is where you are wrong. There was a movie about the current queen, Elizabeth, where Cate Blanchett had another queen's head cut off

If it hadn't happened, there would have been lawsuits against the actress.