Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

[Johny Joe Hold]

For decades now environmentalist whackos have been saying, "No roads here, don't cut down this tree, don't drain this pond..etc." because some animal lives there. These crazies have the idea that if some fish disappears we humans will all die.

Finally this nonsense can be put to rest. Robotics have become so good engineers can manufacture any animal that might go extinct and it can be seen by humans forever. We could have entire zoos with robotic animals.

Here is a great example, a robotic fish:

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

What fun! I must say they look delicious. Perhaps now we can do that hunting-like-you-mean-it adventure tour with miniguns and grenades like we talked about a few years ago.

[Isabella White]

Re: Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

For decades now environmentalist whackos have been saying, "No roads here, don't cut down this tree, don't drain this pond..etc." because some animal lives there. These crazies have the idea that if some specie of animal disappears we humans will all die.

Oh, yes, Dear Brother Mayor Hold; those LIE-beral Demonrats would say things like that. They know full well that the animals could be relocated safely to new homes; but -- oh, no -- that cannot be done because of some silly regulation, or tradition. Now, I can think of only one time when something like this actually turned out to better a situation.

One time, when Agatha (my sister) and I were visiting friends in that ish -hating land of Canada, we heard about a situation where the environ"mental"ists were doing everything they could, to prevent blasted windmills (for electricity) to be erected. This happened at some out-of-the way place that nobody's ever heard of -- where people rarely visit. Frankly, one wonders why they were even considering increasing power supplies there. You see, the only real inhabitants of the area were the turtles -- yes, turtles. And, it was those very turtles that prevented the windmill project from going ahead! Yes, turtles defeated this project, even though it was brought on by their government. Have you ever heard of anything so absurd?

A proposed wind farm at Ostrander’s Point in The County, as it’s known locally, was rejected by an Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal. Not because the wind turbines are harmful to humans. Not because the turbines are to some a blight on pastoral landscapes. Not for any reason to do with electricity policy or wind power. No, the Ostrander Point proposal was rejected because it threatened the peaceful and orderly future of the Blanding’s turtle.

https://www.thestar.com/news/insight..._turbines.html

Whilst the turtles could have been removed and taken to a new home somewhere else, this is one time when I'm glad that such a project was canceled. The reason that this victory is so heart-warming is simple: those windmills never had a chance to spread the cancer that our beloved President Trump knows they create!

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

Honestly those environmentalist hippie tree huggers don't even try to make sense these days. I thought "survival of the fittest" was a key tenet of the Darwinist faith. If a panda or a dolphin is unfit to survive, shouldn't they be allowed to die off? Don't liberals support euthanasia and abortion? Why are the lives of worthless beasts that can't even survive worth more to Democrats than the eternal souls of the unborn? Shouldn't interfering in "natural selection" be considered blasphemous to an evolutionist? After all, if the dolphins were meant to survive, they'd grow legs on come up on land like those legged-fish who gave birth to the monkeys that gave birth to Africans who gave birth to modern humans, or whatever.

I thank Jesus every day that the Bible is without contradiction and that Creation, the triune God, and the Crucifixion all make perfect sense.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

Honestly those environmentalist hippie tree huggers don't even try to make sense these days. I thought "survival of the fittest" was a key tenet of the Darwinist faith.

And, if a robotic dolphin survives but the fish eating ones don't we have evolution. Can't liberals understand anything.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

I think it is a brilliant idea! No doubt woke ecohippie feminazis will find something to complain about though.

Complaints like "the diesel engine of that robot dolphin pollutes the environment", "that robot rat didn't vote for Biden" or "why is that robot duck not a transgender pentasexual".

Perhaps we should replace those woke ecohippie feminazis with robots as well. Robots without a voice system.

[Isabella White]

Re: Replace "Endangered Species" with Robotic Animals

I think it is a brilliant idea! No doubt woke ecohippie feminazis will find something to complain about though.

Complaints like "the diesel engine of that robot dolphin pollutes the environment", "that robot rat didn't vote for Biden" or "why is that robot duck not a transgender pentasexual".

Perhaps we should replace those woke ecohippie feminazis with robots as well. Robots without a voice system.

Oh, yes, indeed, dear Brother Cranky; this is such a wonderful idea! You know, I am getting rather tired of the ongoing "official" chatter that comes from not-my-President Burden's Press Secretary. Instead of staying at home, to clean the house, bake cookies, and read stories to the kiddies, she's taking up an important job that a man should have. It's little wonder we are in such a mess. And, to compensate for people like her not doing their wifely duties at home, the robot manufacturers of the world have come up with a timely and much-needed solution -- just as you have envisioned so accurately: