How do I know that the Bible is inerrant, and is to be understood literally?
If you believe the Bible at all, then you must believe it is literal and inerrant. Inerrant, because God promised to keep His word pure (Ps 12:6), and literal, because the Bible warns against private interpretation (II Peter 1:20).
The best way to understand the Bible is by following the policy of "least scripture twisting". If you believe that the Bible is God's word to man and is meant to be understood by man, then it follows that the plainest, simplest understanding of it is the correct one.
If the Bible is figurative and error prone, then one must be capable of deciding for oneself which parts are right or wrong, and what the figurative speech really means. If the Bible contains both good and bad moral advice, then one must be capable of deciding for oneself which is which. If one is already capable of doing all of that, then one hardly needs the Bible as a guide.
Therefore, I find it ludicrous to suggest that an omnipotent God would encode His word to man in a figurative, error prone book filled with a grab bag of both good and bad moral advice, so that the only people who could understand it and put it to good use are people who don't need the Bible at all and would have done just fine without it.
Any book that can't be understood literally and is chock full of errors and bad advice cannot be the word of an omnipotent God. If you believe that the Bible is God's word, then you must accept that it is inerrant, and you must be willing to understand it literally.
Pastor Billy-Reuben
If you believe the Bible at all, then you must believe it is literal and inerrant. Inerrant, because God promised to keep His word pure (Ps 12:6), and literal, because the Bible warns against private interpretation (II Peter 1:20).
The best way to understand the Bible is by following the policy of "least scripture twisting". If you believe that the Bible is God's word to man and is meant to be understood by man, then it follows that the plainest, simplest understanding of it is the correct one.
If the Bible is figurative and error prone, then one must be capable of deciding for oneself which parts are right or wrong, and what the figurative speech really means. If the Bible contains both good and bad moral advice, then one must be capable of deciding for oneself which is which. If one is already capable of doing all of that, then one hardly needs the Bible as a guide.
Therefore, I find it ludicrous to suggest that an omnipotent God would encode His word to man in a figurative, error prone book filled with a grab bag of both good and bad moral advice, so that the only people who could understand it and put it to good use are people who don't need the Bible at all and would have done just fine without it.
Any book that can't be understood literally and is chock full of errors and bad advice cannot be the word of an omnipotent God. If you believe that the Bible is God's word, then you must accept that it is inerrant, and you must be willing to understand it literally.
Pastor Billy-Reuben
Comment