[GOD=life]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Brother Fred raised an excellent point that we may as well seize the infrastructure instead of destroying something that can be used both for evil (creating Pokemon merchandise) and for good (creating Christian merchandise).

Perhaps a biological agent that attacks only asian DNA would be more suitable. That would make sure that the area is preserved for some time to come.

[John Scopes]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

According to the Mayan calendar we will all go into the dark void on Dec 21, 2012. Why not just use the nukes for one last fireworks celebration in the desert southwest on Dec 20, 2012 ?

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

It's starting to look like the UN here. Talk talk talk and still no nukes on Japan.

[True Disciple]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

So a poisoned water supply has had catastrophic effects before. But in the name of humanitarianism, I would stick with the nuclear weapons.

While it surely is more humanitarian, don't forget that we are talking about godless gibbering Japanese here. They are going to Hell anyway, and everything we can possibly do to them is dwarfed by what Jesus does to them when they arrive there.
Therefore, we can better do it the cheapest way, which I think would be poison. After all, God wants us to be good stewards of the money he blessed us with, unlike liberals who spend their money on God-knows-what kind of luxuries, and then whine about raising taxes of people who use their resources more wisely.
So, I think God would want us to use poison. We will have more money left for the renovation of the Main Chapel that way!

According to the Mayan calendar we will all go into the dark void on Dec 21, 2012. Why not just use the nukes for one last fireworks celebration in the desert southwest on Dec 20, 2012 ?

I know that you, like all evilutionists, believe in all kinds of irrational, wiccan new age mumbo-jumbo, but the Bible says nothing about 2012. Who would you trust, Jesus or some bronze age barbarians who were too stupid to invent gunpowder by themselves?

[MarkHenry]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Ok easy solution:

Ban all imports from japan. Total cost: 0.01$ (cost of paper to write ban on)

Nuke them. Total cost: Priceless. This would result in a worldwide nuclear war against the USA.

Are you all really so dense? If you NUKE a country, do you expect the rest of the world to ignore this? What about the japanese in your country? Will they ignore this?

Please, before considering starting genocide because you don't like a product of another nation, think about if it is worth to destroy the planet or to attempt to ban the product from your country.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Ban all imports from japan.

An economic war. I suppose it is a more modern aproach.

If you NUKE a country, do you expect the rest of the world to ignore this? What about the japanese in your country? Will they ignore this?

They did the first time we nuked Japan.

[MarkHenry]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

they ignored it because the world was at WAR with japan. You can't expect your allies to support the enemy...

Try to bann the product, that's ok.
Killing millions of people because you think the product "sucks" is plain too expensive.

You could build 20 curches for the price of one nuke, more if you build cheep. Why waste money...

[GOD=life]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Nuke them. Total cost: Priceless. This would result in a worldwide nuclear war against the USA.

I already analyzed this aspect in my very first post on the subject.

Japan is one of the most hated countries in the world. No one will risk war with the USA for a country that literally raped the women of its neighbors. I quote from wikipedia:

The systematic rape of as many as 80,000 women by the Japanese soldiers during the six weeks of the Nanking Massacre is an example of such atrocities.[28] During World War II an estimated 200,000 Korean and Chinese women were forced into prostitution in Japanese military brothels, as so-called "comfort women".[29]

Do research for yourself; some keywords "japan wartime rape". Please let us know how you feel about this "civilized" nation afterwards. Also keep in mind that this subject is barely even touched upon in schools, so children don't even know how horrible they are.

As for Japanese in the USA: either they fled their own Godless country or they are working for the enemy: the first should be embraced and welcomed, the second should be forced to play with Pokemon for the rest of their natural lives.

BUT: one IMPORTANT note: I'm not advocating that we actually nuke them or harm them in any way. I'm saying that we should give them a choice: if they don't willingly stop exporting Pokemon, then we will MAKE them stop exporting Pokemon. Their blood will be on their own heads.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

they ignored it because the world was at WAR with japan. You can't expect your allies to support the enemy...

They supported us with Irak as well.

You could build 20 curches for the price of one nuke, more if you build cheep. Why waste money...

You might have a point there. Although we can probably get a discount from Free Market Fred.

[MarkHenry]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

comparison:
one F-16 costs 14 million
one airplane carried costs 4.5 billion

Small baseball pellet fragmentation grenade price about year 2000- $8.00/$10.00 a piece

Flight from US to japan: ~500$


You grab about 10 granades, get on an airplane to japan, find the producer of your hated pokemon, bomb that building with the 10 granades and yourself to make a point that people are willing to die if they don't cut their crap out. Cost: ~700$ including taxi and food

Ignore it, make your kids read the bible and not buy them pokemon: cost 0$ ZERO, null, nothing.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

My kids and grand kids never got pokemon anyway. It's all the other American kids we are worried about.

[GOD=life]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

MarkHenry, I like your idea of trying to keep costs down and risk low. However, the principle is a little more important here.

Also keep in mind that we don't have to drop an atom bomb on Japan. No one has to die. They just have to destroy Pokemon. You can also ask the Japanese how many millions of Japanese lives Pokemon is worth to them. They even have several years to comply until a Republican is president once again.

[Free Market Fred]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

comparison:
one F-16 costs 14 million
one airplane carried costs 4.5 billion

Small baseball pellet fragmentation grenade price about year 2000- $8.00/$10.00 a piece

Flight from US to japan: ~500$


You grab about 10 granades, get on an airplane to japan, find the producer of your hated pokemon, bomb that building with the 10 granades and yourself to make a point that people are willing to die if they don't cut their crap out. Cost: ~700$ including taxi and food

Ignore it, make your kids read the bible and not buy them pokemon: cost 0$ ZERO, null, nothing.

I can see that you don't understand international finance.

First off, if we're going to nuke Japan (though I still say, neutron bombs are best), we first borrow the money from Japan. They are, in fact, already our number 2 creditor, after China. So, we borrow their money, use it to make bombs, nerve gas and bioweapons. Then destroy them, and we don't have to pay them back.

Secondly, we demand that the survivors left in Japan (if any) now have to pay us "war reparations." If they don't have the money, we take over their country and employ them as slave labor.


American investor, headed for Japan

If anyone objects to all the above as a violation of "human rights," we can always declare abortion illegal in Japan, thus proving that we are "pro-life." Plus we can send our missionaries over there to convert them to Christianity - the gooks will be so grateful that we're saving their souls.

Seems to me like another win-win situation.

Remember Pearl Harbor!
Brother Fred

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Some of these proposals strike me as inhumane. We should at least drop warning leaflets on their cities insisting that they convert to Christianity and abandon their sin and debauchery. If they refuse then we can say we have the moral authority to nuke them. It will certainly serve as a warning to other nations that are on our list, like Iran and Pakistan. It's time we got tough with Osama Bed Linen and the rest of the mooselimbs that are threatening us to convert to islam.

[MarkHenry]

Re: ATOM BOMB on Japan on January 20th 2013 - good idea?

Some of these proposals strike me as inhumane

I'd consider you inhumane if you wouldn't realize this.

Killing someone when you life is in danger by that person is ok.
Killing someone because he has killed a very close relative is ok.
Killing a million of people just because someone from their country made a toy that sells well and you still don't like it.... this is murder.

You cannot justify killing MILLIONS of people for something one person created. Killing ONE person... maybe and that's still crazy, but millions... thats too much.

I just don't agree with dragging people into death who have absolutely nothing to do with the problem.