X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

    Originally posted by Wires. View Post
    An Internet forum, or message board, is an online discussion site.

    Online discussion site.

    Discussion.

    Also, why no dinosaurs in bible? Though it was the word of God?
    Read this thread, which you should have done before you had started posting.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

      Originally posted by Jenni111 View Post
      Read this thread, which you should have done before you had started posting.

      http://landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=5610
      The dude posted ten "unanswerable" questions.

      I answered them. He shouldn't have posted them if he would get butthurt when they were answered.
      -----------------------------------------------------------------


      There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

        Originally posted by Jenni111 View Post
        Read this thread, which you should have done before you had started posting.

        http://landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=5610

        Thank you Jenni, I was right about to post that. Now back to this guy...

        If you follow that link, read the first sentence.

        This is not a debate forum.

        This is not a debate forum.

        This is not a debate forum.

        Are you that stupid?

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

          Excellent. I'll make sure to write these down for my children to ask their Science teacher, as soon as I find them.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

            No seriously, a forum, is a place of discussion.

            I'm discussing things with you.

            It seems all too convenient that when I ask you a difficult question, this place is not open for discussion, but when I answer yours, it's okay to attack my answers.

            Selective much?
            -----------------------------------------------------------------


            There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

              Originally posted by Pete Peterson View Post
              Excellent. I'll make sure to write these down for my children to ask their Science teacher, as soon as I find them.
              Hi. Please post in the introduction forum so we can get to know you.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                Originally posted by Pete Peterson View Post
                Excellent. I'll make sure to write these down for my children to ask their Science teacher, as soon as I find them.
                I would advise you against that, as your children will likely get ripped to shreds.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------


                There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                  If humans evolved from chimpanzees, why are chimpanzees still around?

                  Chimpanzees and Humans both evolved from a common ancestor, which, surprise surprise, isn't still around.

                  Nope. No evidence of a common ancestor. Science has pretty much firmly established we evolved from chimps.

                  The Big Bang Theory proposes that everything in the Universe started from something called singularity which is smaller than an atom. How can you stuff everything in the universe in that? It's hard enough to stuff four suitcases in the trunk of your car!

                  The vast majority of the structure of an atom is empty space, if you made a scale model of a hydrogen atom with, the nucleus the size of, say, a golfball, the electrons would be about 500,000 miles away. In a singularity, the atoms are compressed such that there is none of the "emptiness"; you could fit everything into an atom sized space with room to spare.

                  This is highly preposterous. So if we can say 99.99% of atoms are pure empty space, and there are atoms all around us, how come we don't see empty space. If you and I are 99.99% empty space, we would be practically invisible.


                  If the earth really revolves around the sun, then why when we look at the sun we can see it plainly revolving around the earth? (And if the earth was moving around the sun, wouldn't we all fly off into space?)

                  Because from our perspective, the sun is revolving around the earth, due to the earths spin; in relation to the earth, which we understand as being motionless, even though it isn't, the sun does seem to rise and fall, revolving around the earth. Also, lrn2 Gravity. I hear gravity gives you fundamormons alot of trouble.

                  If the earth was truly moving, wouldn't we feel it? Also, we would fly off because of gravity. The sun has a greater gravitational pull than the earth. We would fly off into the sun.

                  If women were not created from Adam's rib, why is it that men have one fewer rib than women?

                  They dont. lrn2 anatomy

                  Yes, they do.

                  How do scientists know stars are "millions of light years away"? Have they been there and back? Do they have a tape measure that stretchs that long?

                  As has been said, the science of triangulation.

                  But see the problem with triangulation is based on assumptions and conjecture. They measure stars by using the distance from earth to sun as one reference, right? Well, how do we know the distance from the earth to sun? We go back to the same problem as before. Measuring long distances.

                  Scientists say all our genetic information is coded on DNA. But DNA is an acid! How can you write information in acid? You can write information on a hard drive, but not a liquid!

                  DNA is not a liquid. And why is it so easy for you to believe that you can write information on a computer hard drive, but not DNA? A bit convenient for your argument isn't it.

                  Why does the A stand for Acid then? Is not acid a liquid?

                  People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then?

                  What do you think skin and hair is, if not natural clothing, which protects our flesh from the elements, and keeps us warm. Because we wear clothes, our bodies haven't had to naturally adapt, ie. our skin hasn't had to grow thicker, and our hair has receded from the majority of the human body.

                  If hair and skin are "natural clothes", I'd say that's a pretty pathetic excuse for clothing! Would you go out in freezing temperatures naked? No, of course not. So if evolution and nature is all about "survival of the fittest" and "the strongest survive", then it would stand to reason that our skin would keep us protected from the elements. Because it is not, it destroys the credibility of evolution.

                  If there really are millions and millions of species, then how could have Adam named them all? Obviously, there's not that many species then! (Gen 2:18-22)

                  I will even use your own logic to disprove you on this one. According to your theologists, Adam lived for over 900 hundred years. I think he had enough time.

                  Wrong. The Bible says Adam did it in one day.

                  If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think?

                  Gasoline & Bug-spray =/= Biochemistry. Also, brains are a highly organized "mishmash" of biochemistry.

                  Can you prove that?

                  Einstein said that if you approach the speed of light, time slows down. Once you hit the speed of light, time stops. If that is so, how come light can travel from point A to point B if time is stopped for light?

                  Time is relative to the universal constant. No, not God kids, but the speed of light. For objects that are traveling close to the speed of light, time slows down, because time is dependent on the relative speed of light, ie. If you'r in a car traveling a tiny bit slower than a train beside you, the train doesn't seem to be traveling incredibly fast, however, if you are walking, the train speeds past you, due to the principal of Relative Speed.

                  Einstein himself said that the "cosmological constant" was his biggest blunder. Still this does not address the question I posed. The faster you go, the more time slows down for you (and you become physically elongated as well). According to relativity, if you hit light speed, time stops. So if time stops, how can you get from Point A to Point B? You have no time to do so!

                  Furthermore, it stands to reason that once you hit light speed you would basically become null and void. You would cease to exist. After all, you could never come out of light speed since there is no time available to a single action. There is no time available for your atoms to vibrate. You cease to exist.

                  Yet light travels at light speed and exists. This is proof that relativity is just conjecture and science fiction.

                  Watch the #1 Televangelist Gospel Hour in the World! "Turn or Burn: Accept Christ or Go to Hell with Rev. Jim Osborne." Check your local cable listings.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                    Originally posted by Wires. View Post
                    I would advise you against that, as your children will likely get ripped to shreds.
                    Your threat has been passed on to the authorities.
                    Posted via Prayer

                    1 Timothy 2:13-15 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
                    Bearing my husband's heirs and being SAVED!

                    Blogging for CHRIST!
                    Witnessing for GOD on YouTube!
                    All a-Twitter for Salvation!
                    Bringing Jesus to MySpace!
                    On FIRE for the Lord on Facebook!
                    My Ladies of Landover profile!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                      Originally posted by Sister Mary Maria View Post
                      Your threat has been passed on to the authorities.
                      That was not a threat.
                      -----------------------------------------------------------------


                      There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                        Originally posted by Wires. View Post
                        That was not a threat.
                        I hope your parents can afford some great joo lawyers.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                          Originally posted by Rev. Jim Osborne View Post
                          If humans evolved from chimpanzees, why are chimpanzees still around?

                          Chimpanzees and Humans both evolved from a common ancestor, which, surprise surprise, isn't still around.

                          Nope. No evidence of a common ancestor. Science has pretty much firmly established we evolved from chimps.

                          The Big Bang Theory proposes that everything in the Universe started from something called singularity which is smaller than an atom. How can you stuff everything in the universe in that? It's hard enough to stuff four suitcases in the trunk of your car!

                          The vast majority of the structure of an atom is empty space, if you made a scale model of a hydrogen atom with, the nucleus the size of, say, a golfball, the electrons would be about 500,000 miles away. In a singularity, the atoms are compressed such that there is none of the "emptiness"; you could fit everything into an atom sized space with room to spare.

                          This is highly preposterous. So if we can say 99.99% of atoms are pure empty space, and there are atoms all around us, how come we don't see empty space. If you and I are 99.99% empty space, we would be practically invisible.


                          If the earth really revolves around the sun, then why when we look at the sun we can see it plainly revolving around the earth? (And if the earth was moving around the sun, wouldn't we all fly off into space?)

                          Because from our perspective, the sun is revolving around the earth, due to the earths spin; in relation to the earth, which we understand as being motionless, even though it isn't, the sun does seem to rise and fall, revolving around the earth. Also, lrn2 Gravity. I hear gravity gives you fundamormons alot of trouble.

                          If the earth was truly moving, wouldn't we feel it? Also, we would fly off because of gravity. The sun has a greater gravitational pull than the earth. We would fly off into the sun.

                          If women were not created from Adam's rib, why is it that men have one fewer rib than women?

                          They dont. lrn2 anatomy

                          Yes, they do.

                          How do scientists know stars are "millions of light years away"? Have they been there and back? Do they have a tape measure that stretchs that long?

                          As has been said, the science of triangulation.

                          But see the problem with triangulation is based on assumptions and conjecture. They measure stars by using the distance from earth to sun as one reference, right? Well, how do we know the distance from the earth to sun? We go back to the same problem as before. Measuring long distances.

                          Scientists say all our genetic information is coded on DNA. But DNA is an acid! How can you write information in acid? You can write information on a hard drive, but not a liquid!

                          DNA is not a liquid. And why is it so easy for you to believe that you can write information on a computer hard drive, but not DNA? A bit convenient for your argument isn't it.

                          Why does the A stand for Acid then? Is not acid a liquid?

                          People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then?

                          What do you think skin and hair is, if not natural clothing, which protects our flesh from the elements, and keeps us warm. Because we wear clothes, our bodies haven't had to naturally adapt, ie. our skin hasn't had to grow thicker, and our hair has receded from the majority of the human body.

                          If hair and skin are "natural clothes", I'd say that's a pretty pathetic excuse for clothing! Would you go out in freezing temperatures naked? No, of course not. So if evolution and nature is all about "survival of the fittest" and "the strongest survive", then it would stand to reason that our skin would keep us protected from the elements. Because it is not, it destroys the credibility of evolution.

                          If there really are millions and millions of species, then how could have Adam named them all? Obviously, there's not that many species then! (Gen 2:18-22)

                          I will even use your own logic to disprove you on this one. According to your theologists, Adam lived for over 900 hundred years. I think he had enough time.

                          Wrong. The Bible says Adam did it in one day.

                          If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think?

                          Gasoline & Bug-spray =/= Biochemistry. Also, brains are a highly organized "mishmash" of biochemistry.

                          Can you prove that?

                          Einstein said that if you approach the speed of light, time slows down. Once you hit the speed of light, time stops. If that is so, how come light can travel from point A to point B if time is stopped for light?

                          Time is relative to the universal constant. No, not God kids, but the speed of light. For objects that are traveling close to the speed of light, time slows down, because time is dependent on the relative speed of light, ie. If you'r in a car traveling a tiny bit slower than a train beside you, the train doesn't seem to be traveling incredibly fast, however, if you are walking, the train speeds past you, due to the principal of Relative Speed.

                          Einstein himself said that the "cosmological constant" was his biggest blunder. Still this does not address the question I posed. The faster you go, the more time slows down for you (and you become physically elongated as well). According to relativity, if you hit light speed, time stops. So if time stops, how can you get from Point A to Point B? You have no time to do so!

                          Furthermore, it stands to reason that once you hit light speed you would basically become null and void. You would cease to exist. After all, you could never come out of light speed since there is no time available to a single action. There is no time available for your atoms to vibrate. You cease to exist.

                          Yet light travels at light speed and exists. This is proof that relativity is just conjecture and science fiction.

                          Care to name some sources?

                          didn't think so.

                          Trust me, i'm a Chemistry Masters student. Not all acid is a liquid.

                          Also, at the lack of sounding quite clichéd, your understanding of science IS greatly flawed.
                          -----------------------------------------------------------------


                          There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                            Originally posted by Wires. View Post
                            Care to name some sources?

                            didn't think so.

                            Trust me, i'm a Chemistry Masters student. Not all acid is a liquid.

                            Also, at the lack of sounding quite clichéd, your understanding of science IS greatly flawed.
                            Okay mister hot head, what LIEbral university did you attend?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                              Originally posted by Christiansoldier View Post
                              I hope your parents can afford some great joo lawyers.
                              Sue me then.

                              Go on.
                              Do it.
                              -----------------------------------------------------------------


                              There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

                                Originally posted by Christiansoldier View Post
                                Okay mister hot head, what LIEbral university did you attend?
                                Heriot-Watt University.

                                Care to stop diverting and, perhaps answer MY questions?
                                -----------------------------------------------------------------


                                There's nothing wrong with a socialized health care system.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X