[Fisherman Jake]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

There is nothing to substantiate what the Bible says.

Faith aside, I guess you haven't looked into Flood Geology, Irreducible Complexity, fulfilled prophecies, unique historical accuracy, or the numerous other things the Bible mentioned before you so-called scientists started asking stupid questions. Like these:

• Roundness of the earth (Isaiah 40:22)
• Almost infinite extent of the sidereal universe (Isaiah 55:9)
• Law of conservation of mass and energy (II Peter 3:7)
• Hydrologic cycle (Ecclesiastes 1:7)
• Vast number of stars (Jeremiah 33:22)
• Law of increasing entropy (Psalm 102:25-27)
• Paramount importance of blood in life processes (Leviticus 17:11)
• Atmospheric circulation (Ecclesiastes 1:6)
• Gravitational field (Job 26:7)
• and many others.

[Source]

[Mordecai]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Prove it.

There is nothing to substantiate what the Bible says.

[Fisherman Jake]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

A...the bible is a storybook however

Prove it.

[im a queer pervert get over it]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Amen Reverend! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And Christians are blessed with an extraordinary God and an extraordinary Book of reference (the Bible) that answers everything.

What does that apostate religion of secular "science" have? A bunch of heathens "experts" competing with each other for earthly rewards, and "Wikipedia" which changes its "truth" moment by moment by whatever seems to be currently popular. And when these scientists do manage to come up with some weak answer, they can't back up their claims with chapter and verse like we can.

Kids, if you are strong in your faith, then YOU can be the teachers this coming school year!

These top 10 questions are awesome! I am copying them down now

A book doesnt amount to evidence unlessa confession, the bible is a storybook however

[Fisherman Jake]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

You present a fascinating thesis. The ancient Greeks were notorious homosexuals. In spite of the cultural achievements made during that, and the Hellenistic periods, one must look at modern Greece. Nothing but gyro shops. That alone is a strong indicator of natural selection and how only the most recessive gene traits were passed along.

And you totally ignored my question...or didn't realize I was asking one. Typical atheist.

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

2 Timothy 3:1-7

If homosexurality is in DNA and DNA is passed along when men are promiscuious with women, but homosexurals are promiscious with men, then homosexurality can't be in DNA.

Now, that means that there are two options. Either homosexurality doesn't exist, or DNA doesn't exist. We know homosexurality exists. THEREFORE, DNA doesn't exist!

(Sorry for all that logicalness...I'm humoring him for the sake of argument)

That's proof number two. At this point your pride is keeping you from seeing the truth...or you're a total idiot who WANTS to burn in Hell.

[John Scopes]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Everyone knows that one of the first ever homosexurals was Homer, back in ancient Greece- suprising name, huh? That was hundreds of generations ago. Even if natural selection was correct, which it's not, homosexurals couldn't have lived more than one generation. Homosexurality is a hobby that has nothing to do with the invisible DNA that secular humanists worship. How's that for proof?

You present a fascinating thesis. The ancient Greeks were notorious homosexuals. In spite of the cultural achievements made during that, and the Hellenistic periods, one must look at modern Greece. Nothing but gyro shops. That alone is a strong indicator of natural selection and how only the most recessive gene traits were passed along.

[Fisherman Jake]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Homosexuals by their very nature will eventually die out because they do not reproduce. Natural selection inevitably removes defective genetic traits that are not conducive to furthering a species.

Everyone knows that one of the first ever homosexurals was Homer, back in ancient Greece- suprising name, huh? That was hundreds of generations ago. Even if natural selection was correct, which it's not, homosexurals couldn't have lived more than one generation. Homosexurality is a hobby that has nothing to do with the invisible DNA that secular humanists worship. How's that for proof?

[John Scopes]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Natural Selection? Pfft.

Let's ponder why homosexuals haven't died out. Everyone claims "it's genetics!"

Well, the AIDS you get from being gay should stop you from having kids, even if you are a "closet" homo who pretends to have a relationship with his wife.

How does your new-age logic answer that?

Homosexuals by their very nature will eventually die out because they do not reproduce. Natural selection inevitably removes defective genetic traits that are not conducive to furthering a species.

To use a purely allegorical example from a document that is frequently quoted here:

Judges 19:22-29 (King James Version)
22 Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.
23 And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly.
24 Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing.
25 But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go.

The individual that owned this house of course realized the foolishness of these men. They obviously would not pass their genetic lines on with the proposed activity. The homeowner wisely realized this and instead offered a female, I am sure the genetic lines furthered in that story could well carry into today.

In another reference from the very same document, masturbation is addressed. Of course this activity does nothing to further genetic lines, and in this story that is allegorically explained.

Genesis 38:9-10 (King James Version)
9 And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother.
10 And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also.

[The Hortons]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

The whole Big Bang theory....from what you write about how 1 thing can contain everything in the world, explain to me how asexual creature, which God created can reproduce from 1 cell by themselves. Or for that matter how when a man and woman reproduce, 2 cells contain EVERYTHING needed to grow you and me? No source needed, 4th graders should be able to tell you that.
As for the rib thing....you don't make very good choices, quoting a source that says that 0.5% of population have more ribs....
"A cervical rib is a supernumerary or accessory rib arising from the seventh cervical vertebra. This abnormality occurs in approximately 0.5% of the population and is more common in females" http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/19/1/105.full.pdf This is from your own heathen scientists. Tho this trait has been slowly bleeding out over the generations, God sees fit to still specially mark a few blessed women with a reminder of how she was created. So you’re saying that 50% of people have more ribs, wow, only 50%. Really conclusive.
Scientists say all our genetic information is coded on DNA. But DNA is an acid! How can you write information in acid? You can write information on a hard drive, but not a liquid!
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1/010118064934 .htm, read that....it talks about the 1st successful creation of LIQUID dna. If they were trying to make liquid DNA, what were they making it from, more liquid? There would be no need then.
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then?
Check this out…. http://www.hypertrichosis.com/. I’m sure you’ve all heard of little aboriginies that are found in the wilderness that are covered in hair. If you stick with the evolution from chimps, aren’t they covered in hair? If we did evolve from them, at some point we became intelligent, and could make clothes, build fires, homes, etc….and there was less need for a totally hairy body….
Another example of how evolution occurs is with the Striper fish. Naturally only occurring in the oceans, which consist of salt water. Yet you can catch a striper in many inland lakes. Where people have caught stripers in the ocean, and released them into freshwater, over time, they have accustomed themselves to be able to thrive in freshwater. The freshwater versions still prefer the same natural food as their saltwater ancestors, blue backed herring minnows, which only live in the ocean. Google it. You’ll find it if you really give a damn.
Plus, I don’t think we’ve evolved clothes to come out of our skin for the simple fact that our DNA doesn’t contain any info on cotton, denim, etc….such a silly statement.
Also, there are plenty of solid acids…..check out these sites:

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem00/chem00117.htm

http://addis.caltech.edu/research/solacids.html

Fat itself is an acid….fat is solid. If you doubt that, press on your gut.

If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think?
Brains need electricity to function. That’s why a dead person would register no electrical activity post-mortem. There are many more things that go into a brain, and a human than biochemistry. Don’t put yourself down by being so short sighted.

Lastly, why is there so much debate about science and God? Is He not omniscient?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/omniscient - for those of you who need sources and/or definitions.
If God knows all, sees all, and created all, would you not expect that He have the perfect capability to create anything He wants? He is the greatest scientist to ever exist! Of course he created all things. That’s a given. But how? Did He snap his fingers? Use magic? Or did he do things methodically and scientifically? To ask these 10 questions goes against one of your basic beliefs, that God KNOWS ALL. Why then would He not be able to create whatever he likes, using science? Seriously. Science screams God all day long.

[Fisherman Jake]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

I never really did understand why people would want to do science. We've already got all the answers we need. If all those scientists spent their time reading the Bible instead of trying to prove the earth wasn't created in six days, they might be able to get saved. It's like trying to prove that we breathe or that ice is cold. They're trying to find the answers when we already know them. Problem is, our answers mean there's a God and they don't like that. They want to do their own thing without ever having to be judged. It's their own fault if they won't listen to our warnings. Dumb atheists.

[Robert Hutchins]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Sir, this is one of the few scientifically lucid statements I have seen here. All your points perfectly confirm natural selection, and that instinctively human genetic lines that survive do not engage in these activities.

Natural Selection? Pfft.

Let's ponder why homosexuals haven't died out. Everyone claims "it's genetics!"

Well, the AIDS you get from being gay should stop you from having kids, even if you are a "closet" homo who pretends to have a relationship with his wife.

How does your new-age logic answer that?

[John Scopes]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

God gave us all the capacity to commit homosexual acts with our own parents....so why not use it?

God gave us all the capacity to murder and cannibalize children....so why not use it?

You can see the faulty reasoning in your statement, but I'm not blaming you for it, rather it's quite a common statement. Ironically, people really didn't use their brains when they came up with it.

Sir, this is one of the few scientifically lucid statements I have seen here. All your points perfectly confirm natural selection, and that instinctively human genetic lines that survive do not engage in these activities.

[Virgin93]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Hello Jim,

I think I should be able to learn quite a lot from you and Mr Spock.
Assisting in writing your log would be a pleasure for me.

[Captain James T. Kirk]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

I am not sure if I understand those questions at all. Maybe I should learn more about sciences.

Hello, Virgin. My name is Captain James T. Kirk, but you can call me Jim. I have the best damned science officer in the fleet under me, and you can bet he's drilled me with his knowledge over and over again. If you would like, you can come to my quarters where I can help educate you in all sorts of sciences. Perhaps you can even help me with the Captain's Log in return. I'm sure you would be very good at that.
I have a bottle of Romulan ale chilling in the replicator and am eagerly awaiting your reply.

[Virgin93]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

"half as stupid as..." & "American." So, to what level of stupidity do you aspire?

That aside, honestly, science and brains and all that stuff is not necessary for women. Just find yourself a good Christian husband and start producing little soldiers and you'll find your days just filled with washing, ironing, cooking and you will feel completely fulfilled.

I've posted this before, but you may not have seen it:

I am not so sure if it would be the right decision to make more German soldiers. I guess we had enough of them 60 years ago.