[GayBilly]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

Hardly. The Taliban have no business sense. Ditto for Al Qaeda. Otherwise, they would have shorted American and United Airlines stock on September 10, 2001, like I did.

Woah! Sorry if this sounds stupid, but is that you in that picture?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

Woah! Sorry if this sounds stupid, but is that you in that picture?

You're absolutely right.

That does sound stupid.

Why are you here, God-hating homosexual troll?

[loco73]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

Yes, I am rather curious when did Patton who died in 1945 call President Eisenhower who was President from 1953 to 1961 a communist?

No, he didn't. But he said some important things about communism (in general).

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

No, he didn't. But he said some important things about communism (in general).

So did Winston Churchill. What is your' point?

[loco73]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

So did Winston Churchill. What is your' point?

Patton once said:
"I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof -- that's their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!"

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

Patton once said:
"I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof -- that's their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!"

[citation needed]

And how did discussing military strategy against the Evil Empire equate to supporting Marxism and getting "thrown out" for so doing?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

[citation needed]

And how did discussing military strategy against the Evil Empire equate to supporting Marxism and getting "thrown out" for so doing?

Yes, at the time Patton made those statements the commie coddling was being done by FDR. Patton was naturally right that the Soviets would have been in shock and aw facing the US army and it would have take only four days, tops, for Moscow to fall. Still, what does this have to do with Eisenhower?

[dogfatrz]

Re: Sarah Palin is right: Eisenhower a communist agent

I take offense to this thread. A woman who quit being a governor because she was knee deep in scandal or she was too weak (she is a woman after all and has no right to vote or run for office) bashed a REPUBLICAN president and you people agree with this.